msueconВестник Московского университета. Серия 6. ЭкономикаLomonosov Economics Journal0130-0105MSUPRESS10.38050/013001052022411msuecon-724Research ArticleМЕЖДИСЦИПЛИНАРНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯINTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIESСубъективное восприятие неравенства: этапы, методология, задачи современных исследованийSubjective inequality perception: stages, methodology, contemporary research objectiveshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8294-0236ДробышевскаяТ. А.DrobyshevskayaT. A.

Дробышевская Татьяна Александровна — кандидат экономических наук, экономический факультет.

Москва

PhD, Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics.

Moscow

tdrobyshevskaya@yandex.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6907-0440РозинскаяН. А.RozinskayaN. A.

Розинская Наталия Анатольевна — кандидат экономических наук, экономический факультет.

Москва

PhD, Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics.

Moscow

rozinskaya@econ.msu.ruМГУ имени М.В. ЛомоносоваРоссияLomonosov Moscow State UniversityRussian Federation20221109202204209228Copyright © Дробышевская Т.А., Розинская Н.А., 20222022Дробышевская Т.А., Розинская Н.А.Drobyshevskaya T.A., Rozinskaya N.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://msuecon.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/724

В статье исследуется развитие концепции и методологии исследования субъективного восприятия неравенства. На основании анализа иностранных и отечественных научных публикаций мы сравниваем основные этапы и направления изучения показателей субъективного неравенства в нашей стране и за рубежом. Соотнося направления исследований проблематики, связанной с субъективным восприятием неравенства, с вызовами конкретно-исторических периодов и ключевыми задачами социально-экономической политики государства, мы показываем, как расширяется поле рассматриваемых проблем и спектр рекомендаций для государственной политики. Подробно останавливаясь на специфике использования субъективных оценок неравенства в постсоветской России, мы приходим к выводу о необходимости усиления внимания государства к субъективным оценкам, и в первую очередь, к субъективному восприятию немонетарного неравенства в России, имеющим, по нашему мнению, на данном этапе принципиальное значение для поддержания стабильности социально-экономической ситуации и обеспечения предпосылок дальнейшего устойчивого развития.

In this paper, we investigate the development of concept and methodology of subjective inequality perception. We use bothforeign or domestic publications to compare the phases and directions of subjective inequality research in Russia and abroad. Correlating the directions of investigations with the challengers of a concrete historical period and key goals of socio-economic policy we show how new problems have been taken into consideration and the recommendations for public policy appear to be more diverse. Specifying the subjective inequality assessment in post-Soviet Russia we come to the conclusion that the subjective estimates, and subjective perception of non-monetary inequality first of all, should be used more actively in government policy advise as obtaining the key importance not only for the socio-economic stability but also for future sustainable development of Russian Federation.

субъективное восприятие неравенствасубъективное монетарное неравенствосубъективное немонетарное неравенствосоциальная политикапостсоветская Россияsubjective inequality perceptionsubjective monetary inequalitysubjective non-monetary inequalitysocial policypost-soviet transition in Russian FederationReferencesБондаренко, Н. В.(1997). Моделирование уровня бедности: динамический и структурный аспекты. Информационный бюллетень мониторинга ВЦИОМ, М М 1 (27), 14–23.Bondarenko, N. V. (1997). Modeling the poverty line: dynamic and structural aspects. Information bulletin of Russian Public Opinion Research Center, 1 (27), 14–23.Гордон, Л. А. (1994). Четыре вида бедности в современной России. Социологический журнал, 4, 18–35.Gordon, L. A. (1994). Four kinds of Russian poverty.Journal of sociology, 4,18–35.Гордон, Л. А., Терехин, А. Т., & Будилова, Е. В. (1998a). Опыт многомерного описания материально-экономической дифференциации населения (по данным «Мониторинга экономических и социальных перемен»). Статья первая. Мониторинг общественного мнения, 1(33), 43–54.Gordon, L. A., Terehin, A. T., & Budilova, E. V. (1998a). An attempt of multilateral description of population economic diff erentiation. Part 1. Monitoring of public opinion, 1(33), 43–54.Гордон, Л. А., Терехин, А. Т., & Будилова, Е. В. (1998b). Опыт многомерного описания материально-экономической дифференциации населения (по данным «Мониторинга экономических и социальных перемен»). Статья вторая. Мониторинг общественного мнения,2(34), 17–22.Gordon, L.A, Terehin, A. T., & Budilova, E. V. (1998b). An attempt of multilateral description of population economic diff erentiation. Part 2. Monitoring of public opinion, 2(34), 17–22.Горшков, М. К., Козырева, П. М., Ли Пэйлинь, & Черныш М. Ф. (2021). Проблемы социального равенства и справедливости в России и Китае. ФНИСЦ РАН. «Новый Хронограф».Gorshkov, M. K., Kozyreva, P. M., Li, P., & Chernish, M. F. (2021). Comparative Study of Social Equality and Justice in China and Russia. FCTAS RAS: Novyy Chronograph. https://doi.org/10.19181/monogr.978-5-94881-514-5.2021Дыбцина, В., & Шашнов, С. А. (1995). О социально-экономической дифференциации населения и уровне бедности в Российской Федерации и ее отдельных регионах. Вопросы статистики, 2, 74–77.Dybcina, V., & Shashnov, S. A. (1995). On socio-economic diff erentiation of population in Russian Federation and its concrete regions.Problems of statistics, 2,74–77.Заславская, Т. И. (1995). Новые данные о доходах россиян. Экономические и социальные перемены: Мониторинг общественного мнения, 4, 7–16.Zaslavskaja, T. I. (1995). New data on incomes of Russian citizens. Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social change, 4,7–16.Зубова, Л., Ковалева, Н., & Красильникова,М. (1993). Динамика экономического положения россиян. Экономические и социальные перемены: Мониторинг общественного мнения, 2, 20–21.Zubova, L., Kovaleva, N., & Krasil’nikova, M. (1993). Dinamics of economic situation of Russian citizens. Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social change,2, 20–21.Кесельман, Л. Е., & Мацкевич, М. Г. (1998). Индивидуальный экономический оптимизм/пессимизм в трансформирующемся обществе. Социологический журнал, 1-2, 39–54.Kesel’man, L. E., & Mackevich, M. G. (1998). Individual economic optimism/pessimism in transforming society.Journal of Sociology, 1-2,39–54.Кирк, Т. К., & Максимова, Л. А. (2017). Возвратившиеся из ГУЛАГа: память, история, идентичность. Вестник Тюменского государственного университета. Гуманитарные исследования. Humanitates, 3 (4), 173–183. DOI: 10.21684/2411-197X-2017-3-4-1733183.Kirk, T. C., & Maksimova, L. A. (2017). GULAG Returnees: Memory, History, Identity. Tyumen State University Herald: Humanities, 3 (4), 173–183.Кирюхин, Д. (2018). Неравенство и его восприятие. Идеология и политика, 2(10), 33–79.Kiryukhin, D. (2018). Inequality and its perception.Ideology and Politics Journal, 2(10), 33–79.Кирута, А. Я., & Шевяков, А. Ю. (1996). Социально-экономическая дифференциация, реальный уровень жизни и уровень бедности семей Российской Федерации. Анализ динамики и межрегиональные сопоставления. Мониторинг социально-экономического потенциала семей. Статистический бюллетень за II квартал, 231–274.Kiruta, A., & Shevjakov, A. (1996). Socio-economic diff erentiation, real living standard and real poverty of families in Russian Federation. Analysis of dynamics and cross-regional analysis.Monitoring of socio-economic potencial of families. Stat. Bjulleten, II quater, 231–274.Мареева, С. В., Слободенюк, Е. Д., & Аникин, В. А. (2022). Толерантность к социальным неравенствам в эпоху неопределенности в России: важна ли субъективная мобильность? Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены,1, 39–60. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2022.1.1982.Mareeva, S. V., Slobodenyuk, E. D., & Anikin, V. A. (2022). Public Tolerance for Social Inequalities in Turbulent Russia: Reassessing the Role of Subjective Mobility. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes,1, 39–60. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2022.1.1982.Немировская, А. В., & Соболева, Н. Э. (2020). Детерминанты субъективного благополучия в России: региональная перспектива.Вестник Института социологии, 11(2), 54–81.https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2020.11.2.641Nemirovskaya, A. V., & Soboleva, N. E. (2020). Determinants of subjective well-being in Russia: a regional perspective. Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology, 11(2), 54–81.https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2020.11.2.641Овчарова, Л., Турунцев, Е., & Корчагина, И. (1997) Система индикаторов уровня бедности в переходный период в России. Доклад по проекту РПЭИ. Дата обращения 30.05.2021, http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/500/659/1219/wp_98-04R.pdf.Ovcharova, L., Turuntsev, E., & Korchagina, I. (1997).Poverty indicators system in Russia in the period of transition. Economics Education and Research Consortium project report. http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/500/659/1219/wp_98-04R.pdfОлейник, А. Н. (2001). Жизнь «по понятиям»: институциональный анализ повседневной жизни «российского простого человека. Дата обращения 30.08.2021, http://www.civisbook.ru/files/File/Oleinyk_2001_2.pdf.Oleinik, A. N. (2001).Life «by the rules»: institutional analysis of everyday life of the ordinary Russian. http://www.civisbook.ru/files/File/Oleinyk_2001_2.pdfПикетти, Т. (2015).Капитал в XXI веке. М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс.Piketti, T. (2015).Capital in XXI century. Ad Marginem Press. Poluhina, E. V. (2020). “Sense of inequality”: what is the subjective inequality and how to study it.Interaction. Interview. Interpretation, 12(2),81–90.Полухина, Е. В. (2020) «Чувство неравенства»: что такое субъективное неравенство и как его изучать. Интеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация,12(2), 81–90.Reutov, J. V. (2018). Social Inequality in Russian Society: Objective and Subjective Dimension. XXI Ural sociological readings “regional social space and time: stable development issues. International conference paper, Yekaterinburg. (pp. 244–247). University of humanities in Yekaterinburg.Реутов, Е. В. (2018). Социальное неравенство в российском обществе: объективное и субъективное измерения. XXI Уральские социологические чтения. Социальное пространство и время региона: проблемы устойчивого развития: материалы Международная научно-практическая конференция (Екатеринбург, 15–16 марта 2018 года). (С. 244–247). Гуманитарный университет.Rimashevskaja, N. M. (2003). Individual and reform: secrets of survival. Institute of Socio Economic Studies of Population Russian Academy of Science.Римашевская, Н. М. (2003). Человек и реформы: Секреты выживания. ИСЭПН РАН.Stiglic, D., Sen, A., & Fitussi, Zh.-P. (2015). Mis-measuring Our Lives. Why GDP Doesn ’t Add Up. Gajdar Institute Press.Стиглиц, Д., Сен, А., & Фитусси, Ж.-П. (2015). Неверно оценивая нашу жизнь: Почему ВВП не имеет смысла? Доклад Комиссии по измерению эффективности экономики и социального прогресса. Изд-во Института Гайдара.Hahulina, L. A. (1998). Subjective aspects in the middle-class formation process in contemporary Russia. In Middle class in contemporary Russia: problems and perspectives, Institute for the Economy in Transition Working Papers, 9, 28–35.Хахулина, Л. А. (1998). Субъективные аспекты в процессах формирования среднего класса в современной России. Средний класс в России: проблемы и перспективы. Научные труды ИЭППП, П П 9, 28-35.Shevjakov, A., & Kiruta, A. (1999). Economic inequality, living standard and poverty of population of Russia and its regions: methods of estimation and analysis. Final report on EERC project. Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population Russian Academy of Science.Шевяков, А. Ю., & Кирута, А. Я. (1999). Я Я Экономическое неравенство, уровень жизни и бедность населения России и ее регионов в процессе реформ: методы измерения и анализа причинных зависимостей: Финальный отчет по проекту EERC. М. : ИСЭПН РАН.Шевяков, А. Ю., & Кирута, А. Я. (1999). Я Я Экономическое неравенство, уровень жизни и бедность населения России и ее регионов в процессе реформ: методы измерения и анализа причинных зависимостей: Финальный отчет по проекту EERC. М. : ИСЭПН РАН.Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2006).Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Demcoracy. Cambridge University Press.Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2006).Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Demcoracy. Cambridge University Press.Almås, I., Cappelen, A., Sorensen, E., & Tungodden, B. (2010). Fairness and the Development of Inequality Acceptance.Science, 328(5982), 1176–1178. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187300Almås, I., Cappelen, A., Sorensen, E., & Tungodden, B. (2010). Fairness and the Development of Inequality Acceptance.Science, 328(5982), 1176–1178. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187300Amiel, Y., Creedy, J., & Hurn, S. (1999). Measuring attitude towards inequality. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 101, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.00142Amiel, Y., Creedy, J., & Hurn, S. (1999). Measuring attitude towards inequality. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 101, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.00142Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of the inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(70)90039-6Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of the inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(70)90039-6Atkinson, A. B. (1998). The Distribution of Income in Industrialized Countries, in Income Inequality: Issues and Policy Options. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.Atkinson, A. B. (1998). The Distribution of Income in Industrialized Countries, in Income Inequality: Issues and Policy Options. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.Barenberg, A. (2014). Gulag Town, Company Town: Forced Labor and Its Legacy in Vorkuta. By Alan. The Yale-Hoover Series on Stalin, Stalinism, and the Cold War. Yale University Press. Pp. xvi+331.Barenberg, A. (2014). Gulag Town, Company Town: Forced Labor and Its Legacy in Vorkuta. By Alan. The Yale-Hoover Series on Stalin, Stalinism, and the Cold War. Yale University Press. Pp. xvi+331.Bossert, W. (1995). Redistribution mechanisms based on individual characteristics. Mathematical Social Sciences, 29(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(94)00760-6Bossert, W. (1995). Redistribution mechanisms based on individual characteristics. Mathematical Social Sciences, 29(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(94)00760-6Bottero, W. (2019).A Sense of Inequality (Transforming Capitalism). Rowman & Littlefi eld Publishers.Bottero, W. (2019).A Sense of Inequality (Transforming Capitalism). Rowman & Littlefi eld Publishers.Braithwaite, J. (1995). The Old and New Poor in Russia: Trends in Poverty. 1994. ESP Discussion Paper Series, 57. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Braithwaite, J. (1995). The Old and New Poor in Russia: Trends in Poverty. 1994. ESP Discussion Paper Series, 57. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Gill, D., & Stone, R. (2015). Desert and inequity aversion in teams. Journal of Public Economics, 123(C), 42–54.https://doi.org/1 0.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.12.001Gill, D., & Stone, R. (2015). Desert and inequity aversion in teams. Journal of Public Economics, 123(C), 42–54.https://doi.org/1 0.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.12.001Gimpelson, V. E., & Monusova G. B. (2014). Perception of inequality and social mobility. NRU Higher School of Economics. Series WP B RP «Economics/EC»,84. https://wp.hse.ru/data/2014/12/15/1103562366/84EC2014.pdf.Gimpelson, V. E., & Monusova G. B. (2014). Perception of inequality and social mobility. NRU Higher School of Economics. Series WP B RP «Economics/EC»,84. https://wp.hse.ru/data/2014/12/15/1103562366/84EC2014.pdf.Gimpelson, V., & Treisman, D. (2017). Misperceiving inequality. Economics & Politics, 30(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12103Gimpelson, V., & Treisman, D. (2017). Misperceiving inequality. Economics & Politics, 30(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12103Guerin, B. (2020).Turning Psychology into Social Contextual Analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003021261Guerin, B. (2020).Turning Psychology into Social Contextual Analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003021261Hagenaars, A., & van Praag, B. (1985). A Synthesis of Poverty Line Definitions . Review of Income and Wealth, 31 (2), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1985.tb00504.xHagenaars, A., & van Praag, B. (1985). A Synthesis of Poverty Line Definitions . Review of Income and Wealth, 31 (2), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1985.tb00504.xJan, G. J. (2013). Subjective Inequality: a Review of International Comparative Studies on People’s Views about Inequality. Europea n Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 54(3), 357–389.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975613000209Jan, G. J. (2013). Subjective Inequality: a Review of International Comparative Studies on People’s Views about Inequality. Europea n Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 54(3), 357–389.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975613000209Kapteyn, A., Kooreman, P., & Willemse, B. (1988). Some Methodological Issues in the implementation of Subjective Poverty Definitions . The Journal of Human resources, 23, 222– 242.Kapteyn, A., Kooreman, P., & Willemse, B. (1988). Some Methodological Issues in the implementation of Subjective Poverty Definitions . The Journal of Human resources, 23, 222– 242.Kelley, J., & Zagorski, K. (2005). Economic Change and the Legitimation of Inequality: The Transition from Socialism to the Free Market in Central-East Europe. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 22, 321–366.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0276-5624(04)22011-XKelley, J., & Zagorski, K. (2005). Economic Change and the Legitimation of Inequality: The Transition from Socialism to the Free Market in Central-East Europe. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 22, 321–366.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0276-5624(04)22011-XKlugman, J., & Braithwaite, J. (1998). Poverty in Russia During the Transition: An Overview. World Bank Research Observer, 13(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/13.1.37Klugman, J., & Braithwaite, J. (1998). Poverty in Russia During the Transition: An Overview. World Bank Research Observer, 13(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/13.1.37Kuhn, A. (2019). The subversive nature of inequality: Subjective inequality perceptions and attitudes to social inequality. European Journal of Political Economy, 59(C), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.04.004Kuhn, A. (2019). The subversive nature of inequality: Subjective inequality perceptions and attitudes to social inequality. European Journal of Political Economy, 59(C), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.04.004Lambert, P. J., Millimet, D. L., & Slottje, D. (2003). Inequality aversion and the natural rate of subjective inequality.Journal of Public Economics,87, 1061–1090.Lambert, P. J., Millimet, D. L., & Slottje, D. (2003). Inequality aversion and the natural rate of subjective inequality.Journal of Public Economics,87, 1061–1090.Maniquet, F. (2004). On the equivalence between welfarism and equality of opportunity. Social Choice and Welfare, 23, 127–147.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-003-0244-8Maniquet, F. (2004). On the equivalence between welfarism and equality of opportunity. Social Choice and Welfare, 23, 127–147.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-003-0244-8Mareeva, S. (2020). Socio-economic inequalities in modern Russia and their perception by the population. Journal of Chinese Sociology, 7, 10 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-020-00124-9Mareeva, S. (2020). Socio-economic inequalities in modern Russia and their perception by the population. Journal of Chinese Sociology, 7, 10 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-020-00124-9Maslow, A. H. (1954).Motivation and personality. Harper.Maslow, A. H. (1954).Motivation and personality. Harper.Mij s, J. J. B. (2019). The paradox of inequality: income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand.Socio-Economic Review,0(0), 1 –29. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy051Mij s, J. J. B. (2019). The paradox of inequality: income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand.Socio-Economic Review,0(0), 1 –29. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy051Milanovic, B., & Jovanovic, B. (1999). Change in the Perception of the Poverty Line During the Times of Depression: Russia, 1993-96. World B ank. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.156090Milanovic, B., & Jovanovic, B. (1999). Change in the Perception of the Poverty Line During the Times of Depression: Russia, 1993-96. World B ank. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.156090Nozick, R. (1974).Anarchy, state and Utopia. Basil Blackwell. Ravallion, M., & Lokshin, M. (2002). Self-rated Economic Welfare in Russia.European Economic Review,46(8), 1453–1473. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2921(01)00151-9Nozick, R. (1974).Anarchy, state and Utopia. Basil Blackwell. Ravallion, M., & Lokshin, M. (2002). Self-rated Economic Welfare in Russia.European Economic Review,46(8), 1453–1473. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2921(01)00151-9Rawls, J. (1971).A theory of justice. Harvard University Press. Roemer, J. E. (1998).Equality of Opportunity. Harvard University Press.Rawls, J. (1971).A theory of justice. Harvard University Press. Roemer, J. E. (1998).Equality of Opportunity. Harvard University Press.Roun d, J. (2006). Marginalized for a Lifetime: The Everyday Experiences of Gulag Survivors in Post-Soviet Magadan. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 88(1), 8 8 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2006.00203.xRoun d, J. (2006). Marginalized for a Lifetime: The Everyday Experiences of Gulag Survivors in Post-Soviet Magadan. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 88(1), 8 8 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2006.00203.xRunciman, W. G. (1966). Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. Routledge and Kegan Paul.Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. Routledge and Kegan Paul.Sarabia, J. M., & Azpitarte, F. (2012). On the relationship between objective and subjective inequality indices and the natural rate of subjective inequality. ECINEQ WP, 248, Febuary. http://www.ecineq.org/milano/WP/ECINEQ2012-248.pdfSarabia, J. M., & Azpitarte, F. (2012). On the relationship between objective and subjective inequality indices and the natural rate of subjective inequality. ECINEQ WP, 248, Febuary. http://www.ecineq.org/milano/WP/ECINEQ2012-248.pdfSchokkaert, E., & Devooght, K. (2003). Responsibility-sensitive fair compensation in diff erent cultures. Social Choice and Welfare, 21, 207–42. DOI: 10.1007/s00355-003-0257-3Schokkaert, E., & Devooght, K. (2003). Responsibility-sensitive fair compensation in diff erent cultures. Social Choice and Welfare, 21, 207–42. DOI: 10.1007/s00355-003-0257-3Seidl, C. (2003). Measuring Inequality Attitudes by Defective Leaky Buckets: A Comment. Economics Working Paper, 16, Kiel University, Department of Economics, Kiel, http://nbn6resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-200911023788Seidl, C. (2003). Measuring Inequality Attitudes by Defective Leaky Buckets: A Comment. Economics Working Paper, 16, Kiel University, Department of Economics, Kiel, http://nbn6resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-200911023788Senik, C. (2004). When Information Dominates Comparison: Learning from Russian Subjective Panel Data. Journal of Public Economics,88, 2099–2123. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-2727(03)00066-5Senik, C. (2004). When Information Dominates Comparison: Learning from Russian Subjective Panel Data. Journal of Public Economics,88, 2099–2123. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-2727(03)00066-5Shariff , A. F., Wiwad, D., & Aknin, L. B. (2016). Income mobility breeds tolerance for income inequality: Cross-national and experimental evidence.Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 373–380.Shariff , A. F., Wiwad, D., & Aknin, L. B. (2016). Income mobility breeds tolerance for income inequality: Cross-national and experimental evidence.Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 373–380.Schmalor, A., & Heine, S. J. (2021). The Construct of Subjective Economic Inequality. Origi nal Manuscript. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550621996867Schmalor, A., & Heine, S. J. (2021). The Construct of Subjective Economic Inequality. Origi nal Manuscript. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550621996867Stouff er, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney L. C., Star S. A., & Williams-Jr. R. M. (1949). Studies in Social Psychology in World War II: The American Soldier, 1, Adjustment During Army Life. Princeton University Press.Stouff er, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney L. C., Star S. A., & Williams-Jr. R. M. (1949). Studies in Social Psychology in World War II: The American Soldier, 1, Adjustment During Army Life. Princeton University Press.Van de Gaer, D., Schokkaert, E., & Martinez, M. (2001). Three meanings of intergenerational mobility. Economica, 68, 519–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0335.d01-15Van de Gaer, D., Schokkaert, E., & Martinez, M. (2001). Three meanings of intergenerational mobility. Economica, 68, 519–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0335.d01-15van Praag, B. (1991). Ordinal and Cardinal Utility: An Integration of the Two Dimensions of the Welfare Concept.Journal of Econometrics,50(1-2), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/03044076(91)90090-zvan Praag, B. (1991). Ordinal and Cardinal Utility: An Integration of the Two Dimensions of the Welfare Concept.Journal of Econometrics,50(1-2), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/03044076(91)90090-zWalker, I., & Smith H. (eds.) (2001). Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development, and Integration. Cambridge University Press. Wiwad, D., Mercier, B., Maraun, M. D., Robinson, A. R., Piff , P. K., & Aknin, L. B., et al. (2019). The Support for Economic Inequality Scale: Development and adjudication. PLoS ONE, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218685Walker, I., & Smith H. (eds.) (2001). Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development, and Integration. Cambridge University Press. Wiwad, D., Mercier, B., Maraun, M. D., Robinson, A. R., Piff , P. K., & Aknin, L. B., et al. (2019). The Support for Economic Inequality Scale: Development and adjudication. PLoS ONE, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218685Yitzhaki, S. (1982). Relative deprivation and economic welfare. European Economic Review,17 (1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(82)90045-9Yitzhaki, S. (1982). Relative deprivation and economic welfare. European Economic Review,17 (1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(82)90045-9

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.