The lessons of the Petrine reforms as seen by a historian
https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-2-10
Abstract
The article attempts to identify the most significant lessons that can be learned from the experience of Peter the Great transformations— one of the key developments in Russian history that determined the vector of the country's development for a long time. The author considers both positive and negative implications of Peter the Great's reforms, and concludes that the success of Peter I reforms was primarily due to the fact that their focus on the European model of development correlated with internal trends in Russian development at the turn of the 17th–18th centuries, and this is exactly what made Peter I transformations irreversible. Peter's successors, faced with serious financial and economic problems, were forced to make certain adjustments to his transformations, but retained all the main institutions he created. Thanks to Peter's transformations, Russia acquired the status of a great power, which was due to the country's integration into the system of international relations, the world economy and culture, without which the very status of a great power lost its meaning. Thanks to the reforms in economic sphere, the technological gap with the leading European countries was largely overcome, but the priority development of industries focused on military needs and based on the labor of serfs hindered the development of capitalist relations and contributed to the transformation of Russia into a raw material power. At the same time, the pace of economic development remained low, which resulted in a new lag in the next historical stage. Reforms in the social sphere, based on meeting fiscal needs of the state, hampered but could not stop the development of Russian society
References
1. Anisimov E.V. (1994). Russia without Peter, 1725-1740. SPb.: Lenizdat.
2. Wirtschafter E. K. (2002). Social Structures; People of various ranks in the Russian Empire. M.: Logos,
3. The Borders and Markers of Social Stratification in 17-20th Century Russia. (2018). SPb.: Aleteya.
4. Kamenskii A.B. (1999). From Peter I to Paul I: Reforms in the 18th Century Russia. M.: RGGU.
5. Karp S. Ya., Mel’yantsev V. A. (2013). Intriduction: The East and the West in the 18th Century, The World History. Vol. 4. The World in the 18th Century. M.: Nauka. 5-11.
6. Catherine’s II Nakaz to the Legislative Comission. (2018). M.: Pamiatniki istoricheskoi mysli.
7. Panchenko A.M. (1984). Russian Culture on the Eve of Petrine Reforms. L.: Nauka.
8. Panchenko A.M. (1991). The Church Reform and the Culture of the Petrine Epoch, XVIII vek. Sb. 17. SPb.: Nauka. 3-16.
9. Petruhintsev N. N. (2014). The Inner Policies of Anna Ioannovna (1730-1740). M.: ROSSPEN.
10. Reforms in Russia from Ealy Time until the End of the 20th Century. (2016). 4 vols. Vol. 2: 18 – the first half of the 19th Century. Ed. By A.B. Kamenskii. M.: ROSSPEN.
11. Soloviev S. M. (1984). The Public Lectures on Peter the Great. M.: Nauka.
12. Freeze G. (2000). The Soslovie/Estate Paradigm and Social History of Russia, American Russian Studies. The Milestones of the Latest Historiography. The Imperial Period. Samara: Samarskyi gos. Universitet, 121-162.
13. Chirskova I. M. (2022). The Power and Culture in Russia (1724-1741): the Policies of Legal Regulation. Abstract of the PhD Dissertation. M.: RGGU.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Kamenskii A.B. The lessons of the Petrine reforms as seen by a historian. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2023;(2):159-167. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-2-10