Preview

Moscow University Economics Bulletin

Advanced search

Estimating the effect of exclusivity on multi-sided markets: an empirical study of video game market

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-3-4

Abstract

At present many markets may be viewed as multisided with platforms where different groups of agents interact. However, many aspects of these markets are still not thoroughly studied, including the competition between platforms with the goal to increase user base. As noted in many theoretical works, due to the phenomenon of zero prices, non-price factors of competition play a leading role on such markets. Among others the importance of exclusive contracts is highlighted in scientific literature, but empirically their effect on the user base has not been fully estimated. In this study we examine video game market since its importance in global economy has increased in the recent decades. The effect of exclusivity on the total video game platforms’ sales and on the sales volumes of individual video games is empirically estimated. As an additional control variable, the age rating of video games is included, which was not considered in prior works. Drawing on the results of estimating econometric model, the author concludes that for platforms on the video game market it is advantageous to increase the share of exclusive contracts, but this relationship is characterized by diminishing returns to scale. On the other hand, for video game developers exclusive distribution on a particular platform results in lower overall sales. Based on these results it can be concluded that platforms can compete for exclusive contracts and in the process of negotiating for exclusivity a compensation from the platform should be provided to video game developers.

About the Author

P. A. Levakov
RANEPA
Russian Federation

Moscow



References

1. Dyatlov, S. A. (2014). Network Effects and Increasing Returns in the Information and Innovation Economy. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 86(2), 7–11.

2. Shastitko, A. E., & Parshina, E. N. (2016). Markets with Two-Way Network Effects: Specification of subject area. Journal of Modern Competition, 10(1), 5–17.

3. Shastitko, A. E., & Markova, О. А. (2017). Aggregators around us: a new reality and approaches to research. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost', (4), 5–15.

4. Jablonskie, C. A. (2013). Multisided Platforms and Markets: Key Approaches, Concepts and Practices. Russian Management Journal, 11(4), 57–78.

5. Ahmad, N. B., Barakji, S. A. R., Abou Shahada, T. M., & Anabtawi, Z. A. (2017). How to launch a successful video game: A framework. Entertainment computing, 23, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2017.08.001

6. Armstrong, M., & Wright, J. (2007). Two-sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks and Exclusive Contracts. Economic Theory, 32(2), 353–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-006-0114-6

7. Corts, K., & Lederman, M. (2007). Software exclusivity and the scope of indirect network effects in the U. S. home videogame market. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2(2), 121–136. 7 7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.08.002

8. Cox, J. (2014). What Makes a Blockbuster Video Game? An Empirical Analysis of US Sales Data. Managerial and Decision Economics, 35(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2608

9. Engelstätter, B., & Ward, M. R. (2018). Strategic timing of entry: evidence from video games. Journal of Cultural Economics, 42, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-016-9276-7

10. Gallagher, S., & Seung, P. (2002). Innovation and competition in standard-based industries: A historical analysis of the U. S. home video game market. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.985749

11. Gil, R., & Warzynski, F. (2015). Vertical Integration, Exclusivity, and Game Sales Performance in the US Video Game Industry.The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 31(1), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewu006

12. Harding. S., Kandlikar, M., & Gulati, S. (2016). Taxi apps, regulation, and the market for taxi journeys. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 88, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.03.009

13. Katz, M., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75(3), 424–440.

14. Landsman, V., & Stremersch, S. (2011). Multihoming in Two-Sided Markets: An Empirical Inquiry in the Video Game Console Industry. Journal of Marketing, 75(6), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.09.0199

15. Maruyama, M., & Ohkita, K. (2011). Platform strategy of video game software in Japan, 1984–1994: Theory and evidence. Managerial and Decision Economics, 32(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1521

16. Rochet, J-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(3), 990–1029. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493212

17. Rysman, M. (2009). The Economics of Two-Sided Markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3), 125–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.3.125

18. Shankar, V., & Bayus, B. (2002). Network effects and competition: An empirical analysis of the Home Video Game Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24(4), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.296

19. Song, H., Jung, J., & Cho, D. (2017). Platform Competition in the Video Game Console Industry: Impacts of Software Quality and Exclusivity on Market Share. Journal of Media Economics, 30(3), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/08997764.2018.1449750


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Levakov P.A. Estimating the effect of exclusivity on multi-sided markets: an empirical study of video game market. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2023;(3):68-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-3-4

Views: 339


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0130-0105 (Print)