Preview

Moscow University Economics Bulletin

Advanced search

Developing ecosystem forms of implementing credit relations in AIC

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-59-2-5

Abstract

Ecosystem and platform business models are becoming one of the dominant organizational forms changing the landscape of financial industry, the form and content of relations between actors. Variability of business models and architecture of financial ecosystems (platforms), due to organizational changes accompanying the development of fintech, determines the multiplicity of scenarios for implementing credit relations in their circuit. Part of these relationships, limited by the scale of the agro-industrial complex, is defined as the subject area of this study, and its goal is to develop algorithms and models for the implementation of credit relations, taking into account the opportunities provided by existing and promising ecosystem solutions in the financial and agricultural markets.

The research methodology is based on existing cases and approaches to the regulation of financial ecosystems (platforms), as well as the author's hypothesis about the prospects of incorporating business processes (including lending) within industry value chains and e-government services into a single ecosystem solution for the agro-industrial complex, which determines the logic of the results.

It has been revealed that ecosystem forms of credit relations realization are characterized by the participation in intermediation of information and financial flows of intermediaries of a special kind - financial ecosystems (platforms), with varying degrees of variability involved in the conclusion and implementation of a credit transaction. The resulting information and network effects make it possible to identify four possible ecosystem forms of implementing credit relations in the agro-industrial complex: digital platforms that implement the technological service of searching and comparing credit products; financial platforms (marketplaces) for legal entities; financial marketplaces with blockchain platforms; infrastructure industry ecosystem built on the collaboration of public and private services. The author shows evolution of the form and subject composition of credit relations for each option. The algorithm for implementing credit relations developed on the basis of the results obtained can be used in practical implementation of the idea of an infrastructural industry ecosystem that provides a proactive mode of state support for concessional lending to the agro-industrial complex.

About the Author

D. A. Korobeynikov
Volgograd State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Volgograd



References

1. Belousov, D. R., & Penukhina E. A. (2018). On building a qualitative model of the Russian ICT ecosystem. Studies on Russian Economic Development, (3), 94–104.

2. Burkaltseva, D. D., Kuryanova, I. V., & Tyulin, A. S. (2019). The evolution of banking services in the context of the transformation of socio-economic systems. Scientific Bulletin: finance, banking, investment, (1), 63–68.

3. Doroshenko, S. V., & Shelomentsev, A. G. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystem in modern economic research. Journal of Economic Theory, (4), 212–221.

4. Inshakova, E. I. (2020). Formation of the ecosystem of the digital economy of the Russian Federation: institutional aspect. Journal of Volgograd State University. Economics, 22(4), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.15688/ek.jvolsu.2020.4.1

5. Kleiner, G. B., Rybachuk, M. A., & Karpinskaya, V. A. (2020). Development of ecosystems in the fi nancial sector of Russia. The Manager, 11(4), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-1

6. Korobeinikov, D. A. (2023). Model of the digital ecosystem of the agro-industrial complex. University Bulletin, (1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-1-83-91

7. Korobeynikova, O. M., Ocheretyanaya, D. V., Peters, I. A., & Shaldokhina, S. Yu. (2022). Digital ecosystems for agribusiness. Agrarian Russia, (6), 40–47.

8. Markova, V. D. (2018). Business models of companies based on platforms. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (10), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-10-127-135

9. Medennikov, V. I. (2021). Digital ontological integration of basic digital platforms in the agro-industrial complex ecosystem. Agricultural Risk Management, 4(38), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.53988/24136573-2021-04-01

10. Popova L. V., Lata M. S., & Melikhov P. A. (2021). Ecosystem of the digital economy of small agribusiness. Regional economy. The South Of Russia, 9(2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.15688/re.volsu.2022.3.14

11. Shkarupeta, E. V. (2019). Management of the development of industrial complexes in the context of reindustrialization: thesis for the degree of Doctor of Economics: 08.00.05: defended 05.04.19.

12. Solodilova, N. Z., Malikov, R. I., & Grishin, K. E. (2018). Confi guration approach to the study of the regional ecosystem of entrepreneurship. EkonomicheskayaPolitika, 13(5), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.18288

13. Sviridov, O. Yu., & Nekrasova, I. V. (2019). Fintech ecosystem development trends in the Russian economy. Journal of Volgograd State University. Economics, 21(4), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.15688/ek.jvolsu.2019.4.19

14. Akatkin, Y. M., Karpov, O. E., Konyavskiy, V. A., & Yasinovskaya, E. D. (2017). Digital economy: Conceptual architecture of a digital economic sector ecosystemm. Business Informatics, 4(42), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.17323/1998-0663.2017.4.17.28

15. Burda, Y. D., Volkova, I. O., & Gavrikova, E. V. (2020). Meaningful analysis of innovation, business and entrepreneurial ecosystem concepts. Russian Management Journal, 18(1), 73–102. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2020.104

16. Den Hartigh, E., Tol, M., & Visscher, W. (2006). The Health Measurement of a Business Ecosystem. ECCON — Annual Meeting ≪Organizations as Chaordic Panarchies≫. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241311026

17. Korobeynikova, O. M., Korobeynikov D. A., Lunyakov O. V., Dugina T. A., & Kozenko Y. A. (2022). Digital ecosystem innovation in consumer lending in Russia. Proceedings of the II International Scientific Conference on Advances in Science, Engineering and Digital Education (ASEDU-II-2021) AIP Conference Proceedings, 2647(1), 040005. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0118042

18. Moore, J. (1996 May 27). The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. Harper Business. http://herbrubenstein.com/articles/THEDEATH-OFCOMPETITION.pdf

19. Thomas, L., & Autio, E. (2019). Innovation ecosystems. SSRN. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3476925

20. Thomas, L., & Autio, E. (2012). Modeling the Ecosystem: A Meta-Synthesis of Ecosystem and Related Literatures. DRUID. Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282122759

21. Wareham, J., Fox, P. B., & Cano Giner, J. L. (2014). Technology Ecosystem Governance. Organization Science, 25(4), 1195–1215. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2201688


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Korobeynikov D.A. Developing ecosystem forms of implementing credit relations in AIC. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2024;(2):95-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-59-2-5

Views: 217


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0130-0105 (Print)