Economic integration assessing models in regional integration associations
https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-6-4
Abstract
Rapid development of economic integration encourages the scientific community to search for models and cooperation mechanisms that could explain the integration processes in the world economy. This paper examines the key models of integration assessment that exist in economic scientific literature — “linear” by B. Balassa (1), “core-periphery” by L. Tindemans (2), “gravitational” by J. Tinbergen (3). The purpose of the article is to determine the most relevant and universal model that allows evaluating the integration interaction in all integration associations. Using the example of the of EAEU, APEC and AC integration blocks, the author carries out the analysis of these three integration models. The study is based on the author's approach, which are determines a set of indicators and defines each model characteristics. The paper highlights the criteria for correlating regional integration blocks with their corresponding integration assessment models and provides a graphical visualization of the models. The findings show that a wide variety of regional integration blocks in the world economy today call into question the choice of one universal integration model from the existing ones. The author develops a new system of indicators which will subsequently help conduct a comprehensive assessment of integration between different countries and groups of countries.
Keywords
References
1. Bagdasaryan, K. M. (2019). Analysis of an economic integration model. Journal of Economic Theory, 16(3), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-3.4
2. Formozov, A. A. (1959). Ethnocultural areas on the territory of the European part of the USSR in the Stone Age. Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences.
3. Gurova, I. P. (2009). Measuring global and regional trade integration. Eurasian Economic Integration, 3(4), 60–73.
4. Gurova, I. P. (2010). Regional trade in the CIS: “gravity model”. International economics, 3, 43–46.
5. Ivanenko, V. (2007). Russia: gravity and integration. Russia in Global Politics, 5(3).
6. Karasyova, N. P. (2009). Using the Lafay and Balassa Indices to Identify Export Specializations of Central and Eastern European Countries. Journal of International Law and International Relations, 4, 106–111.
7. Kosikova, L. S. (2008а). Integration projects of Russia in the post-Soviet space: ideas and practice.
8. Kosikova, L. S. (2008b). Problems of consolidation of the Commonwealth countries around Russia in the conditions of internal heterogeneity of the CIS region. REJ, 5–6.
9. Migranyan, A. A. (2015). Potential of development of economic cooperation between Russia and EAEU and CIS countries. Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 65.
10. Mirakyan, D. G. (2020). Economic integration development: assessment of the possibility to create EAEU-ASEAN free trade zone. Problems of management theory and practice. Izdatelstvo ООО «International media group», 36–46. https://doi.org/10.46486/0234-4505- 2020-10-36-46
11. Troekurova, I. S., & Pelevina, K. A. (2014). Gravity models of foreign trade of BRICS countries. Izvestia of Saratov University. A new series. Economics series. Management. Law, 14, 1(2), 133–142.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Mirakyan D.G. Economic integration assessing models in regional integration associations. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2023;(6):58-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-6-4