Preview

Moscow University Economics Bulletin

Advanced search

Developing the open innovation model: focus on intellectual property lending

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-3-10

Abstract

The implementation of import substitution and ensuring technological sovereignty is not an easy task for the Russian economy, which correlates with intensification of innovation activity in all spheres of national economy. One of the major factors to ensure necessary dynamics in transforming the domestic economy is the availability of free exchange of innovative technologies among subjects of various sectors in the economy provided by the conception of open innovations. Current models of innovation systems, with prevailing state financing of R&D, are not effective enough, which creates prerequisites for involving credit organizations into this area in order to intensify R&D, especially in the areas essential for practical activities. The authors propose developing and adapting the open innovation model in relation to the participation of credit institutions. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the role of credit institutions as an ecosystem actor in the open innovation model. The research methodology is based on the analysis of theoretical and practical works on open innovation theory in order to apply lending secured by the results of intellectual activity. The major results of the study are based on (i) considering the open innovation model to properly include credit institutions as an ecosystem actor, (ii) proposing possible solutions regarding the cooperation of actors in innovation processes, and (iii) selecting innovative projects for possible secured lending which will accelerate the processes of innovative development. The obtained results can be used for further development of this area and in practice of the subjects of innovation activity.

About the Authors

O. V. Sysoeva
Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov
Russian Federation

Saratov



A. V. Vasina
Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov
Russian Federation

Saratov



O. N. Kiseleva
Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov
Russian Federation

Saratov



References

1. Belikova, K. M. (2021). Open Innovations in the Military Sphere: Practical Measurement and Protection of Intellectual Property. Matters of Russian and International Law, 11(6A), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2021.31.26.008

2. Boyko, V. P., & Falko, S. G. (2019). Dualism of open innovations in the innovation activity of enterprises. Drukerovskij vestnik, 4(30), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.17213/2312-6469-2019-4-16-19

3. Vidyakina, O. V., Ivanova, M. A., & Pyshinkova, M. S. (2021). Problematic issues of the pledge of exclusive rights in Russia. Copyright (Bulletin of the Academy of Intellectual Property), 4, 79–97.

4. Vlasova, V., & Roud, V. (2020). Cooperative Strategies in the Age of Open Innovation: Choice of Partners, Geography and Duration. Foresight and STI Governance, 14(4), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2020.4.80

5. Galkin, D. G. (2019). Closed and open innovations: inter-firm interaction in the field of intellectual property. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences, 5-3, 115–118. https://doi.org/10.24411/2500-1000-2019-10984

6. Derunova, E. A. (2021). Improving the institutional structure of the scientific and intellectual potential of the agro-food complex based on the concept of open innovations. Ostrovskie chteniya, 1, 131–134.

7. Doronina, I. S., Filippov, P. V., & Zubkova, S. V. (2019). Bank lending secured by intellectual property as a promising direction for the development of innovative technologies in Russia. Modern Science: actual problems of theory and practice. Series: economics and law, 1, 59–63.

8. Karzanova, I. V. (2018). Open innovations: modern experience of Chinese companies. Innovacionnaya ekonomika, 1(14), 2.

9. Kirillova, E. A. (2022). Factor model for managing the implementation of open innovations within the framework of regional scientific and industrial complexes. Vestnik of Volzhsky University named after V. N. Tatishchev, 2(3/50), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.51965/20767919_2022_2_3_88

10. Kudryavtseva, S. S., & Kartashov, K. V. (2019). The role of additive manufacturing technologies in the system of open innovations. Managing of sustainable development, 5(24), 24–29.

11. Kuzmin, S. S. (2022). Open innovations as a tool for developing a firm’s growth strategy: conditions for success. Innovation & Investment, 2, 13–19.

12. Malyshev, D. A. (2022). Open innovations as a manifestation of a modern model of the innovation process at industrial enterprises. Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow, 12(1A), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2022.79.34.012

13. Maslenkova, O. F. (2007). Lending secured by intellectual property. Banking, 11, 36–40.

14. Maslenkova, O. F. (2017). Features of lending secured by exclusive rights to intellectual property. Economy of regions, 13(4), 1291–1303. https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-4-25

15. Pogodina, T. V., Veselovsky, M. Ya., Barkovskaya,V. E., & Pilipenko, P. P. (2022). Stimulation of industrial territorial clusters to implement the open innovation model in the face of new challenges. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seria: Ekonomika, 3, 89–104. https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-6646-2022-3-89-104

16. Polishchuk, D. A. (2021). The concept of evaluating models of open innovations in pharmaceuticals. Innovacii. Nauka. Obrazovanie, 35, 1565–1570.

17. Razinkina, I. V. (2022). Problematic aspects of the open innovation paradigm at different levels of the innovation process.Creative Economy, 16(3), 907–924. https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.16.3.114414

18. Rudskaya, I. A., & Kryzhko, D. A. (2021). Organization of interaction between the participants of the open innovative business ecosystem. Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge, 44(3), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.24412/2304-6139-2021-11236

19. Suleimanov, N. T. (2018). Lending secured by the right to intellectual property as a way to implement the concept of the Bashkir technological initiative. Izvestiya Ufimskogo nauchnogo tcentra RAN, 2, 91–99.

20. Trefilova, I. N. (2015). Business models of open innovations. Innovacionnaya nauka, 12-1, 288–291.

21. Tumenova, S. A. (2021). Model of open innovations in the system of regional management: priorities, principles, mechanisms. News of the Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5(103), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.35330/1991-6639-2021-5-103-66-74

22. Udaltsova, N. L. (2022). “Open innovations” as an imperative of strategic development: the experience of Russia and the USA. Ekonomicheskie nauki, 209, 335–345. https://doi.org/10.14451/1.209.335

23. Khabib, M. D., Teplyakova, M. Yu., & Krasnov, E. V. (2019). State of financing scientific research in the Russian Federation at the present stage. Vestnik universiteta, 5, 151–158. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2019-5-151-158

24. Shinkevich, A. I., & Yarlychenko, A. A. (2020). Features of the implementation of the model of open innovations by business entities in the context of the intellectualization of production factors. Russian journal of innovation economics, 10(4), 2187–2198. https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.10.4.110883

25. Shkolnik, I. S. (2019). The impact of the spread of the concept of open innovations on the effectiveness of corporate R&D.Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow, 9(8-1), 280–286. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2019.90.8.028

26. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, USA, 227 p. https://books.google.es/books?id=OeLIH89YiMcC&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru#v=onepage&q&f=false (дата обращения: 15.01.2023)

27. Felin, T., & Zenger, T. (2014). Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy, 43(5), 914–925. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2156951

28. Kiseleva, O. N., Sysoeva, O. V., Vasina, A. V., & Sysoev, V. V. (2022). Updating the Open Innovation Concept Based on Ecosystem Approach: Regional Aspects.J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex, 9(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8020103

29. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2014). The Paradox of Openness: Appropriability, External Search and Collaboration. Research Policy, 43(5), 867–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004

30. Yun, J. J., & Liu, Z. (2019). Micro-and Macro-Dynamics of Open Innovation with a Quadruple-Helix Model. Sustainability, 11(12), 3301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123301

31. Yun, J. J., Won, D., & Par k, K. (2018). Entrepreneurial cyclical dynamics of open innovation. J Evol Econ., 28, 1151–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0596-y


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Sysoeva O.V., Vasina A.V., Kiseleva O.N. Developing the open innovation model: focus on intellectual property lending. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2023;(3):193-216. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-3-10

Views: 282


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0130-0105 (Print)