Preview

Moscow University Economics Bulletin

Advanced search

Major features of managing socio-economic development of the region in crisis conditions

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-6-8

Abstract

The global crises that the Russian economy has to face contribute not only to the destruction of traditional trade, economic and logistics ties, but also to improving the quality of state strategic management. The macroeconomic situation develops in such a way that centralized planning and regulation of socio-economic processes becomes a tangible advantage and can produce high effect both in the long term and in tactical perspective. The advantages will be given to those subjects of the Russian Federation whose management will be carried out on the basis of a system of balanced measures to support reproductive processes, a reasonable redistribution of financial, economic and human resources and comprehensive programs aimed at overcoming interrelated constraints. The article presents an overview of scientific and theoretical approaches to managing socio-economic development of regions, taking into account spatial and territorial features of the organization of economic activity and current global trends. The trends of socio-economic development of the Sverdlovsk region and the peculiarities of regional management in conditions of increasing crisis pressure are considered. The purpose of the article is to develop an algorithm for crisis management of the region, taking into account the state and prospects of economic development. The authors argue that governance in the region is characterized by specific characteristics, the main task of which is to ensure stable socio-economic development, regardless of the influence of negative factors of an economic, political or social nature using effective tools that proactively affect problems and constraints. The authors determine the necessity to identify the factors contributing to the development of crisis situation in the region, which will significantly improve the quality of program development according to industry and subject criteria. The analysis of socioeconomic indicators of the region's development allowed us to draw conclusions concerning the effectiveness of targeted support by industry and subject criteria, which is currently widely used in Russia.

About the Author

M. S. Oborin
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Perm branch ; Perm State National Research University ; State Agro-Technological University named after Academician D. N. Pryanishnikov
Russian Federation

Perm



References

1. Animitsa, E. G., & Novikova, N. V. (2022). Trends in the economic dynamics of the classical old industrial region of Russia: the case of the Sverdlovsk region. Journal of New Economy, 23(2), 64–79. DOI: 10.29141/2658-5081-2022-23-2-4

2. Animitsa, E. G., & Silin, Ya. P. (2021). The contours of the formation of paradigmatic foundations in the municipal economy. Journal of New Economy, 22(1), 5–25. DOI: 10.29141/2658-5081-2021-22-1-1

3. Ermashkevich, N. S. (2019). A comprehensive analysis of government measures to support the sector of small and medium-sized enterprises in Russia. Rossijskoe predprinimatel’stvo, 20(1), 13–38. DOI: 10.18334/rp.20.1.39727

4. Feldman, M. A. (2019). Annual report on the results of the activities of the Commissioner for the Rights of Entrepreneurs of the Sverdlovsk region as a mirror of the state of small and medium-sized businesses in the region. Voprosy upravleniya, 1, 13–169. DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2019-1-13-21

5. Kachanova, E. A., & Smirnova, E. A. (2020). Fiscal measures to stimulate small businesses in the context of the economic crisis. Voprosy upravleniya, 4(65), 44–54. DOI: 10.22394/2304- 3369-2020-4-44-54

6. Melekhova, A. S. (2020). Transformation of the event industry in the context of the challenges of the digital economy. Rossijskaya shkola svyazej s obshchestvennost’yu, 18-19, 178–196.

7. Silin, Ya. P., Animitsa, E. G., & Novikova, N. V. (2019). Theories of economic growth and the economic cycle in the study of regional processes of new industrialization. Journal of New Economy, 20(2), 5–29. DOI: 10.29141/2073-1019-2019-20-2-1

8. Stepanov, N. S. (2020). Why institutional mechanisms for supporting small and mediumsized businesses do not work in the context of a pandemic (coronavirus infection). Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo, 3(52), 243–248. DOI: 10.25683/VOLBI.2020.52.349

9. Sverdlovskaya oblast’ v cifrah`2023 (2023). Statisticheskij sbornik / Upravlenie Federal’noj sluzhby gosudarstvennoj statistiki po Sverdlovskoj oblasti i Kurganskoj oblasti, 80.

10. Trofimova, O. M., & Shemetova, N. K. (2019). Methodology for assessing the impact of the control and supervisory activities of the state on the functioning of small and mediumsized businesses. Voprosy upravleniya, 4(59), 168–177. DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2019-4-168-177

11. Vlasova, N. Yu. (2022). Positions of large and large cities in spatial transformations of Russian regions: case of the Urals. Region: Ekonomika i Sociologiya, 1(113), 263–288. DOI: 10.15372/REG20220109


Review

For citations:


Oborin M.S. Major features of managing socio-economic development of the region in crisis conditions. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2023;(6):133-148. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-6-8

Views: 155


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0130-0105 (Print)