Preview

Вестник Московского университета. Серия 6. Экономика

Расширенный поиск

Нейроэкономика принятия решения о готовности платить на рынке шоколада

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-59-2-12

Аннотация

В данном исследовании рассматривается концепция готовности платить в контексте нейроэкономического подхода. В качестве дополнительного фактора, влияющего на готовность потребителя платить за пищевые продукты (в частности, шоколад), автор предлагает включить когнитивный нейро-отклик. Для этого автор сначала теоретически обосновывает необходимость включения дополнительного фактора в перечень потенциальных предикторов готовности платить и систематизирует нейроэкономические исследования с точки зрения применяемых нейрометрик и отдельных зон головного мозга, задействованных при принятии решения о готовности платить. Далее автор проводит серию нейроэкономических экспериментов с использованием электроэнцефалографии и эмпирически анализирует нейрометрики, которые играют значимую роль в принятии решений о готовности платить. Данные экспериментов далее используются автором для регрессионного и факторного анализов, чтобы оценить готовность потребителей платить за шоколад. Полученные результаты демонстрируют значимость когнитивного нейро-отклика и активности фронтальной зоны головного мозга в процессе принятия решения о готовности платить. Таким образом, основной вклад данного исследования заключается в улучшении понимания того, как мозговая активность может быть дополнительным фактором готовности платить, а также в демонстрации способа увеличения объясняющей способности модели оценки готовности платить за шоколад. Результаты данной работы могут быть полезны исследователям, практикам, производителям и маркетологам шоколадных продуктов, а также потребителям шоколада для разработки эффективных стратегий маркетинга и принятия осознанных решений о готовности платить.

Об авторе

Д. В. Семенова
https://www.hse.ru/org/persons/137339414
Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»
Россия

Семенова Дарья Владимировна — аспирант, младший научный сотрудник Центра когнитивных нейронаук, стажер-исследователь Международной лаборатории экономики нематериальных активов

Пермь



Список литературы

1. Березка, С. М., & Шерешева, М. Ю. (2019). Нейрофизиологические методы исследования потребительского восприятия телевизионного рекламного контента. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Менеджмент, 18(2), 175–203.

2. Неделько, А. Ю. (2018). Возможности и ограничения использования методов нейромаркетинга. Управленческие науки, (4), 77–83.

3. Трофимов, Г. Ю. (2006). Экономика и нейронаука — на пути синтеза. Экономика и математические методы, 42(4), 3–16.

4. Agarwal, S., & Xavier, M. J. (2015) Innovations in Consumer Science: Applications of Neuro-Scientific Research Tools. Adoption of Innovation— Balancing Internal and External Stakeholders in the Marketing of Innovation, 25–42. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-14523-5_3.

5. Ahmed, Z. U., Zbib, I. J., Sikander, A., & Gilbert Noujaim, R. (2012). Does country of brand origin (COBO) matter for the Lebanese consumers?. EuroMed Journal of Business, 7(2), 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/14502191211245561

6. Alfnes, F., Guttormsen, A. G., Steine, G., & Kolstad, K. (2006). Consumers’ willingness to pay for the color of salmon: a choice experiment with real economic incentives. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(4), 1050–1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00915.x

7. Aupperle, R. L., Melrose, A. J., Francisco, A., Paulus, M. P., & Stein, M. B. (2015). Neural substrates of approach-avoidance conflict decision-making. Human brain mapping, 36(2), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22639

8. Blend, J. R., & van Ravenswaay, E. O. (1999). Consumer Demand for Eco-labeled Apples: Results from Econometric Estimation. American Journal Agriculture Economics 81, 1072–1077. https://doi.org/10.2307/1244086

9. Breidert, C., Hahsler, M., & Reutterer, T. (2006). A review of methods for measuring willingness-to-pay. Innovative marketing, 2(4).

10. Briz, T., Drichoutis, A. C., & House, L. (2015). Examining projection bias in experimental auctions: The role of hunger and immediate gratification. Agricultural Economics, 3, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-015-0040-7

11. Cerda, A. A., & Garcia, L. Y. (2021). Willingness to pay for a COVID-19 vaccine. Applied health economics and health policy, 19, 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-021-00644-6

12. Danner, L., Haindl, S., Joechl, M., & Duerrschmid, K. (2014). Facial expressions and autonomous nervous system responses elicited by tasting different juices. Food Research International, 64, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.06.003

13. Davenport, H. J. (1902), Proposed modifications in Austrian theory and terminology, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 16(3), 355–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/1881982

14. Del Prete, M., & Samoggia, A. (2020). Chocolate consumption and purchasing behaviour review: Research issues and insights for future research. Sustainability, 12(14), 5586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145586

15. Dolgopolova, I., & Teuber, R. (2018). Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Health Benefits in Food Products: A Meta-Analysis. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 40(2), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppx036

16. Domino, E., Ni, L., Thompson, M., Zhang, H., Shikata, H., Fukai, H., … & Ohya, I. (2009). Tobacco smoking produces widespread dominant brain wave alpha frequency increases. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 74(3), 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.08.011

17. Ehlers, C., Wall, T., & Schuckit, M. (1989). EEG spectral characteristics following ethanol administration in young men. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 73(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(89)90118-1

18. Feldmann, C., & Hamm, U. (2015). Consumers’ perceptions and preferences for local food: A review. Food quality and preference, 40, 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.09.014

19. Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1996). The prefrontal landscape: implications of functional architecture for understanding human mentation and the central executive. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 351(1346), 1445–1453. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1996.0129

20. Golnar-Nik, P., Farashi, S., & Safari, M. S. (2019). The application of EEG power for the prediction and interpretation of consumer decision-making: A neuromarketing study. Physiology & behavior, 207, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.04.025

21. Goncalves, T., Lourenco-Gomes, L., & Pinto, L. M. C. (2020). Dealing with ignored attributes through an inferred approach in wine choice experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 87, 101551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101551

22. Groeppel-Klein, A. (2005). Arousal and consumer in-store behavior. Brain research bulletin, 67(5), 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.06.012

23. Haab, T. C., Interis, M. G., Petrolia, D. R., & Whitehead, J. C. (2013). From hopeless to curious? Thoughts on Hausman’s “dubious to hopeless” critique of contingent valuation. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 35(4), 593–612. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppt029

24. Harapan, H., Wagner, A. L., Yufika, A., Winardi, W., Anwar, S., Gan, A. K., ... & Mudatsir, M. (2020). Willingness-to-pay for a COVID-19 vaccine and its associated determinants in Indonesia. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 16(12), 3074–3080. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1819741

25. Hermann, S., & Dolan, R. J. (1998). Price customization. Marketing Management, 7(3), 10.

26. Hirabayashi, K., Tokuda, T., Nishinuma, T., Kawabata Duncan, K., Tagai, K., & Dan, I. (2021). A willingness-to-pay associated right prefrontal activation during a single, real use of lipsticks as assessed using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Frontiers in Neuroergonomics, 2, 731160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2021.731160

27. Hogenkamp, P. S., Stafleu, A., Mars, M., Brunstrom, J. M., & de Graaf, C. (2011). Texture, not flavor, determines expected satiation of dairy products. Appetite, 57(3), 635–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.08.008

28. Hubert, M. (2010). Does neuroeconomics give new impetus to economic and consumer research? Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(5), 812–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.03.009

29. Janssen, M., & Hamm, U. (2012). Product labelling in the market for organic food: Consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for different organic certification logos. Foodquality and preference, 25 (1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.12.004

30. Januszewska, R., & Viaene, J. (2001). Sensory segments in preference for plain chocolate across Belgium and Poland. Food Quality and Preference, 12(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(00)00035-5

31. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

32. Kamble, A., Zagade, A., & Abhang, N. (2017). Evaluating impulse purchases generated by affections and advertisement effectiveness. Management Science Letters, 7(10), 479–486. http://doi.org/1075267/j.msl.2017.7.003

33. Katt, F., & Meixner, O. (2020). A systematic review of drivers influencing consumer willingness to pay for organic food. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 100, 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.029

34. Kawabata Duncan, K., Tokuda, T., Sato, C., Tagai, K. and Dan, I. (2019). Willingnessto-Pay-Associated Right Prefrontal Activation During a Single, Real Use of Cosmetics as Revealed by Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00016

35. Kennedy, O., Law, C., Methven, L., Mottram, D., & Gosney, M. (2010). Investigating age-related changes in taste and affects on sensory perceptions of oral nutritional supplements. Age and ageing, 39(6), 733–738. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afq104

36. Kenning, P., & Plassmann, H. (2005). NeuroEconomics: An overview from an economic perspective. Brain research bulletin, 67(5), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.07.006

37. Knutson, B. K., Ricks, S., Wimmer, G. S., Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron, 53, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.010

38. Kowalska-Pyzalska, A. (2019). Do consumers want to pay for green electricity? A case study from Poland. Sustainability, 11(5), 1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051310

39. Kozelova, D., Matejkova, E., Fikselova, M., & Dekanyova, J. (2014). Analysis of consumer behavior at chocolate purchase. Potravinarstvo, 8(1), 62–66. doi: 10.5219/325.

40. Lagast, S., Gellynck, X., Schouteten, J. J., De Herdt, V., & De Steur, H. (2017). Consumers’ emotions elicited by food: A systematic review of explicit and implicit methods. Trends in food science & technology, 69, 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.09.006

41. Lamote, S., Hermans, D., Baeyens, F., & Eelen, P. (2004). An exploration of affective priming as an indirect measure of food attitudes. Appetite, 42(3), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2003.11.009

42. Liu, P., Guo, Q., Ren, F., Wang, L., & Xu, Z. (2019). Willingness to pay for self-driving vehicles: Influences of demographic and psychological factors. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 100, 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.01.022

43. Lusk, J. L., & Schroeder T. C. (2004). Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86, 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00592.x

44. Lybeck, A., Holmlund-Rytkonen, M., & Saaksjarvi, M. (2006). Store brands vs. manufacturer brands: consumer perceptions and buying of chocolate bars in Finland. Int.Rev. of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 16(4), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593960600844343

45. Macht, M. (2008). How emotions affect eating: A five-way model. Appetite, 50(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.07.002

46. Mai, L. W. (2014). Consumers’ willingness to pay for ethical attributes. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 32(6), 706–721. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-08-2013-0139

47. Marozzo, V., Raimondo, M. A., Miceli, G. N., & Scopelliti, I. (2020). Effects of au naturel packaging colors on willingness to pay for healthy food. Psychology & Marketing, 37(7), 913–927. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21294

48. McCluskey, J. J., & Loureiro, M. L. (2003). Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for food labeling: A discussion of empirical studies. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 34(856-2016-57150), 95–102. http://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.27051

49. Melton, B. E., Huffman, W. E., Shogren, J. F., & Fox, J. A. (1996). Consumer preferences for fresh food items with multiple quality attributes: evidence from an experimental auction of pork chops. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(4), 916–923. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243848

50. Murao, S., Yoto, A., & Yokogoshi, H. (2013). Effect of smelling green tea on mental status and EEG activity. International Journal of Affective Engineering, 12(2), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.5057/ijae.12.37

51. Nasser, J. A., Bradley, L. E., Leitzsch, J. B., Chohan, O., Fasulo, K., Haller, J., ... & Del Parigi, A. (2011). Psychoactive effects of tasting chocolate and desire for more chocolate. Physiology & behavior, 104(1), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.04.040

52. Otter, V., Prechtel, B., & Theuvsen, L. (2018). Country of origin effect for food products from developing and transition countries: A PLS analysis of German consumers’ perception. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 30(4), 355–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2018.1449695

53. Ozretic-Dosen, D., Skare, V., & Krupka, Z. (2007). Assessments of country of origin and brand cues in evaluating a Croatian, western and eastern European food product. Journal of Business Research, 60(2), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.011

54. Plassmann, H., O’doherty, J., & Rangel, A. (2007) Orbitofrontal cortex encodes willingness to pay in everyday economic transactions. Journal of neuroscience, 27, (37), 9984–9988. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2131-07.2007

55. Poelmans, E., & Rousseau, S. (2016). How do chocolate lovers balance taste and ethical considerations? British Food Journal, 118(2), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2015-0208

56. Ramsoy, T. Z. et al. (2018). Frontal brain asymmetry and willingness to pay. Frontiers in neuroscience, 12, 138. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00138

57. Rausch, M., Kurz, P., Liegel, N., & Muller, K. M. (2017). Choice-Based Conjoint and NeuroPricing: Combining the Best of Two Worlds. In SKIM/Sawtooth Software European Conference and Training Event, 19–22 September. Barcelona, Spain.

58. Revelle, W., & Rocklin, T. (1979). Very Simple Structure — alternative procedure for estimating the optimal number of interpretable factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14(4), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1404_2

59. Rousseau, S. (2015). The role of organic and fair trade labels when choosing chocolate. Food Quality and Preference, 44, 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.04.002

60. Rozin, P., Levine, E., & Stoess, C. (1991). Chocolate craving and liking. Appetite, 17(3), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6663(91)90022-K

61. Ruggeri, G., Corsi, S., & Nayga, R. M. (2021). Eliciting willingness to pay for fairtrade products with information. Food Quality and Preference, 87, 104066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104066

62. Schaufele, I., & Hamm, U. (2017). Consumers’ perceptions, preferences and willingnessto-pay for wine with sustainability characteristics: A review. Journal of Cleaner production, 147, 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.118

63. Schott, L., Britwum, K., & Bernard, J. C. (2022). Can region labeling alter taste impressions and willingness to pay? A field experiment with chocolate bars. Food Quality and Preference, 100, 104606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104606

64. Shankar, M. U., Levitan, C. A., Prescott, J., & Spence, C. (2009). The influence of color and label information on flavor perception. Chemosensory Perception, 2, 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-009-9046-4

65. Semenova, D., Kulikova, S., Shamgunova, Y. Z., & Molodchik, M. (2023). Measuring effects of packaging on willingness-to-pay for chocolate: Evidence from an EEG experiment. Food Quality and Preference, 107, 104840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104840

66. Smeets, P. A., de Graaf, C., Stafleu, A., van Osch, M. J., Nievelstein, R. A., & van der Grond, J. (2006). Effect of satiety on brain activation during chocolate tasting in men and women. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 83(6), 1297–1305. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/83.6.1297

67. Songsamoe, S., Saengwong-ngam, R., Koomhin, P., & Matan, N. (2019). Understanding consumer physiological and emotional responses to food products using electroencephalography (EEG). Trends in Food Science & Technology, 93, 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.09.018

68. Steinhauser, J., Janssen, M., & Hamm, U. (2019). Consumers’ purchase decisions for products with nutrition and health claims: What role do product category and gaze duration on claims play? Appetite, 141, 104337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104337

69. Stroebele, N., & De Castro, J. M. (2004). Effect of ambience on food intake and food choice. Nutrition, 20(9), 821–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2004.05.012

70. Stubenitsky, K., Aaron, J. I., Catt, S. L., & Mela, D. J. (1999). Effect of information and extended use on the acceptance of reduced-fat products. Food Quality and Preference, 10(4-5), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00056-1

71. Sundt, S., & Rehdanz, K. (2015). Consumers’ willingness to pay for green electricity: A meta-analysis of the literature. Energy Economics, 51, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.06.005

72. TecAu, A. S., & Chitu, I. B. (2018). Influence of packaging on taste perception. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series V: Economic Sciences, 63–70.

73. Thaichon, P., Jebarajakirthy, C., Tatuu, P., & Gajbhiyeb, R. G. (2018). Are you a chocolate lover? An investigation of the repurchase behavior of chocolate consumers. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 24(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2017.1266551

74. Tomelleri, R., & Grunewald, K. K. (1987). Menstrual cycle and food cravings in young college women. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 87(3), 311–315.

75. Van Bochove, M. E., Ketel, E., Wischnewski, M., Wegman, J., Aarts, E., de Jonge, B., ... & Schutter, D. J. (2016). Posterior resting state EEG asymmetries are associated with hedonic valuation of food. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 110, 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.10.006

76. Williams, J. (2010). Neuromarketing: When science and marketing collide. Blue Print. Wong, L. P., Alias, H., Wong, P. F., Lee, H. Y., & AbuBakar, S. (2020). The use of the health belief model to assess predictors of intent to receive the COVID-19 vaccine and willingness to pay. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 16(9), 2204–2214. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1790279

77. Yang, Y., & Raine, A. (2009). Prefrontal structural and functional brain imaging findings in antisocial, violent, and psychopathic individuals: a meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 174(2), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2009.03.012

78. Zorowitz, S., Rockhill, A. P., Ellard, K. K., Link, K. E., Herrington, T., Pizzagalli, D. A., ... & Dougherty, D. D. (2019). The neural basis of approach-avoidance conflict: a model based analysis. Eneuro, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0115-19.2019


Дополнительные файлы

Рецензия

Для цитирования:


Семенова Д.В. Нейроэкономика принятия решения о готовности платить на рынке шоколада. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 6. Экономика. 2024;(2):264-290. https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-59-2-12

For citation:


Semenova D.V. Neuroeconomics of decision-making on chocolate market. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2024;(2):264-290. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-59-2-12

Просмотров: 198


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0130-0105 (Print)