The significance of A. Smith’s “invisible hand” in developing economic science
https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-59-6-3
Abstract
A. Smith's expression “the invisible hand” has been widely used for more than a century among both theoretical economists and business people. It is well known and widely used in virtually all social sciences, in fiction and art, and in the daily lives of citizens of many countries whose economies are developing according to market principles. It is no coincidence that it has become a metaphorical reflection of the real and imaginary omnipotence of the market, a kind of perpetual motion machine and a reliable advocate of market civilization. The variety of phenomena and factors accompanying capitalist development from manufactory period to modern digital revolution provides rich material for expanding the understanding of the “invisible hand”, its place and role in both economy and economic science. The purpose of the article is precisely to reveal the modern sound of this brief historical expression. In essence, the role of the market has not changed in the 21st century. Its scale has grown to a global one, with new elements of market mechanism and challenges to its effectiveness.
References
1. Ershov, M. V. (2023). The world and Russia in the environment of transformation: is the economic recovery sustainable? Voprosy Economiki, 12, 31–47. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-12-31-47 .
2. Kapeliushnikov, R. I. (2023a). Multihanded Adam Smith. Part one. Voprosy Economiki, 10, 53–74. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-12-53-74.
3. Kapeliushnikov, R. I. (2023b). Multihanded Adam Smith. Part two. Voprosy Economiki, 11, 123–140. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-12-123-140
4. Marx, K. (1958). Toward criticism of political economy. Marx K., Engels F. Works. 50 vols. Vol. 13. 2nd Ed.. M.: Gospolitizdat.
5. Marx, K. (1960). Capital. Marx K., Engels F. Works. 50 vols. Vol. 23. 2nd Ed.. M.: Gospolitizdat.
6. Porokhovsky, A. A. (2009). Market development and political economy. Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal, 1, 3–25.
7. Porokhovsky A. A. (2021). Plan and market: marriage of convenience. Economic revival of Russia, 3(69). 46–52. DOI: 10/37930/1990-9780-2021-3-69-46-52
8. Porokhovsky, A. A. (2014). Political economy civilization signifi cance. Moscow University Economics Bulletin, 4, 43–55.
9. Porokhovsky, A. A. (2019). Private and public interests as a development factors under digitalization. Economic revival of Russ ia, 2(60), 55–61.
10. Smith, A. (2007). Inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. M.: Eksmo.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Porokhovsky A.A. The significance of A. Smith’s “invisible hand” in developing economic science. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2024;(6):39-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-59-6-3