Criteria of product environmental quality in students’ perception

Today, the question of making consumption more eco-friendly is important both for consumers interested in purchasing environmentally friendly products (EFPs) and for producers interested in expanding the market for such products. However, there are still many “white spots” in this area, starting with the criteria for classifying products as environmentally friendly. The aim of this study is to identify the criteria for the environmental quality of products as perceived by the youth, using first-year students at the University of Tyumen as an example. The methodological basis of the research is the works of Russian and foreignscolars, revealing the characteristics inherent in EFPs, as well as the results of a survey of 741 students on types of EFPs and their attributes. The EFP concept is interpreted ambiguously in Russian-language sources – from a narrow understanding as products safe for human health to a broad understanding that also considers the impact of the product on the environment at different stages of its life cycle. Foreign sources have comprehensive definitions of EFP, as well as detailed lists of criteria for classifying products as environmentally friendly. The survey results show that students associate EFP with certain materials (obtained from plant raw materials, easily recyclable, produced from secondary raw materials). The main criteria for eco-friendliness in the students' responses are the following: multiple uses of the product, biodegradability, the possibility of recycling product waste, reducing the consumption of raw materials and pollution of the environment with harmful substances at the stage of production and use of the product, and reducing waste generation. Misconceptions about classifying certain products as EFP are also identified, leading to the conclusion that ecological education is necessary. The catalog developed to systematize students' responses, which includes 196 characteristics of EFP, can be used to study the understanding of EFPs by consumers in different market segments and to develop strategies to improve the ecological quality of products.

1. Adamov, E. V., & Bulgakov G. V. (2019). The potential for the development of environmental marketing and the problem of greenwashing in Russia. In YA. YU. Radyukova (Eds.), Derzhavinskie chteniya (p. 264–274). TGU im. G. R. Derzhavina. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41150367

2. Cheremushkina, I. V., & Oseneva O. V. (2019). Forecast and prospects for the formation of consumer preferences in the fi eld of environmentally friendly products in the regional market. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies, 4(82), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2019-4-171-177

3. Fedotova, O. V., & Tabekina, O. A. (2014). A study of the attitude of Russian consumers to eco-products (using the example of electronics). Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 21(348), 21–28. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21596726

4. Gornostaeva, ZH. V., ZHidkov, V. E., & Alekhina, E. S. (2014). Features of state regulation of environmentally friendly food production. Science Time, 12, 108–118. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22844405

5. Grishanova, S. V., & Tatarinova, M. N. (2013). Problems of greening consumption and environmental labeling of products. Bulletin of Altai State Agricultural University, 9(107), 147–152. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20283690

6. Kolomyjko, U. N., & Vinogradova, A. V. (2012). The Russian market of eco-products: problems and solutions. International Technical Journal, 2, 29–33. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?edn=pfqzxz

7. Kompaneec, M., & Podar', E. (2022). Production of environmentally friendly products as a priority direction for the development of the food market. In L. Todorich (Eds.), VIII National Scientific and Practical Conference “Problems and challenges of the regional economy in the context of globalization” (p. 51–60). Tipografi a Centrografi c SRL. https://ibn.idsi.md/ru/vizualizare_articol/173686

8. Lebedev, A. V., & Bagnyuk, D. V. (2019). Operationalization of the concept of “Environmental friendliness” based on the study of consumers of ecological food products. Economics of Sustainable Development, 3(39), 208–215. https://istina.msu.ru/publications/article/239757882/

9. Leont'ev, M. S., & Ovsyannikov, Yu. A. (2010). Research on the demand for environmentally friendly food products in the consumer market of Yekaterinburg. Izvestiya of the Urals State University of Economics, 4(30), 152–157. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/issledovanie-vostrebovannosti-ekologicheski-chistyh-produktov-pitaniya-napotrebitelskom-rynke-ekaterinburga

10. Lukina, A. V. (2019). The paradox of eco-friendly products: why does everyone want, but few people buy eco-friendly products? In N. G. Bagautdinova, L. N. Safi ullin, E. V. Makarova (Eds.), III All-Russian Economic Forum with international participation “Economy in a Changing World” (p. 216–219). Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38562831

11. Nikitina, B. A. (2021). Consumer choice in the fi eld of household goods and the ability of the Russian consumer to environmental refl ection. Bulletin of the Samara Municipal Institute of Management, 2, 82–91. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47224607

12. Orlin, N. A., & Savel'eva, K. S. (2017). Characteristics of yoghurts and similar products from the standpoint of their environmental friendliness. International Journal of Experimental Education, 3-1, 84–85. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28779495

13. Panasejkina, V. S., Belyaeva, E. A. (2021). Trends in demand for environmental goods and responsible consumption in Russia. Moscow Economic Journal, 8, 346–355. https://doi:10.24412/2413-046Х-2021-10495

14. Pisareva, E. V. (2015). Marketing research on the demand for ecological food among young people: declaration, reality, prospects. Practical marketing, 10(224), 13–17. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/marketingovoe-issledovanie-vostrebovannosti-ekologicheskogoprodovolstviya-v-molodezhnoy-srede-deklaratsiya-realnost-perspektivy

15. Ratner, S. V., & Drobot, A. S. (2021). Assessment of compliance of eco-labeling of consumer goods with ISO 14020–14025 standards. Economic Bulletin of ICS RAS, 1(2), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.25728/econbull.2021.1.5-ratner

16. Smirnova, E. V. (2010). Environmental marketing. Practical marketing, 4(158), 9–14. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ekologicheskiy-marketing

17. The All-Russian classifi er of products by type of economic activity (OKPD 2) OK 034-2014 (KPES 2008). Retrieved March 31, 2024, from https://classifikators.ru/okpd

18. Trifanova, E. N. (2020). Consumer behavior in the market of environmentally friendly food. In E. V. Yudina (Eds.), Student science on current problems and prospects of innovative development of the regional agro-industrial complex (p. 158–161). Omskij GAU im. P. A. Stolypina. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43053365

19. Yakovleva, Yu. K., & Skorovarova, M. K. (2019). Environmental marketing: conceptual views and trends of recent decades. Bulletin of Donetsk National University. Series B. Economics and Law, 1, 189–196. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38582951

20. Bhardwaj, A. K., Garg, A., Ram, S., Gajpal, Y., & Zheng, C. (2020). Research Trends in Green Product for Environment: A Bibliometric Perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), Article 8469. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228469

21. Cheah, I., & Phau, I. (2011). Attitudes towards environmentally friendly products: The infl uence of ecoliteracy, interpersonal infl uence and value orientation. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 29(5), 452–472. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634501111153674

22. Dangelico, R. M., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2010). From green product defi nitions and classifi cations to the Green Option Matrix. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(16–17), 1608–1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.07.007

23. Kianpour, K., Jusoh, A., & Asghari, M. (2014). Environmentally friendly as a new dimension of product quality. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 31(5), 547–565. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-06-2012-0079

24. Lu, L., Bock, D. & Joseph, M. (2013). Green marketing: what the Millennials buy. Journal of Business Strategy, 34(6), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-05-2013-0036

25. Marcon, A., Ribeiro, J. L. D., Dangelico, R. M., de Medeiros, J. F., & Marcon, É. (2022). Exploring green product attributes and their eff ect on consumer behaviour: A systematic review. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.04.012

26. Sdrolia, E., & Zarotiadis, G. (2018). A comprehensive review for green product term: from defi nition to evaluation. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(10), 150–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12268

27. Vučemilović, V., Kovačević, A. & Blažević, I. (2021). Acceptability and perception of environmentally friendly products by student population in Croatia. Ekonomski vjesnik, 34, 265–277. https://doi.org/10.51680/ev.34.2.2

28. Wang, W., Ma, D., Wu, F., Sun, M., Xu, S., Hua, Q., & Sun Z. (2023). Exploring the Knowledge Structure and Hotspot Evolution of Greenwashing: A Visual Analysis Based on Bibliometrics. Sustainability, 15(3), 2290. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032290