Влияние ориентированности компаний на кооперацию на развитие межорганизационных инноваций

Растущий спрос на инновации и регулярные обновления в бизнесе, вызванные стремительным развитием технологий и цифровизацией всех сфер человеческой жизнедеятельности, требует от компаний развития способностей по адаптации к изменениям и по развитию инноваций. Однако ограниченность ресурсов компаний, нехватка знаний и сложность современных технологий для самостоятельной разработки и внедрения, требует также способностей развивать межорганизационные инновации, управлять межорганизационными проектами и минимизировать риски, связанные с привлечением внешних партнеров. Одним из ключевых этапов жизненного цикла межорганизационных отношений, способных повлиять на их результат является выбор партнеров, которые смогли бы обеспечить достижение необходимого результата. Ранее в исследованиях предпринимались попытки выделения критериев отбора партнеров для разработки межорганизационных инноваций, однако, предложенные критерии были сфокусированы, прежде всего, на соответствии потенциальных партнеров целям фокальной компании в то время, как внутренняя заинтересованность потенциальных партнеров в таких отношениях не учитывалась. В данном исследовании авторы стремятся преодолеть это упущение и определить индикаторы, характеризующие заинтересованность потенциальных партнеров в участии в межорганизационных от ношениях. В данном исследовании разрабатывается модель зависимости заинтересованности компании в развитии межорганизационных инноваций от ориентированности компании на кооперацию и тестируется на данных опроса 165 специалистов и топ-менеджеров российских компаний. В результате исследования подтверждается связь между ориентированностью компаний на кооперацию и заинтересованностью в развитии межорганизационных инноваций, а также обнаруживается частичная медиация данной связи отношением к межорганизационным инновациям.

1. Ташмен, М., & О’Райли III, Ч. (2013). Победить с помощью инноваций. Практическое руководство по управлению организационными изменениями и обновлениями. Альпина Паблишер.

2. Ahlfänger, M., Gemünden, H. G., & Leker, J. (2022). Balancing knowledge sharing with protecting: The efficacy of formal control in open innovation projects. International Journal of Project Management, 40(2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.09.007

3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

4. Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a Theory of Planned Behavior Questionnaire (с. 12).

5. Asare, M. (2015). USING THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR TO DETERMINE THE CONDOM USE BEHAVIOR AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS. American journal of health studies, 30(1), 43–50.

6. Asare, M., & Sharma, M. (2009). Using the theory of planned behavior to predict safer sexual behavior by ghanaian immigrants in a large midwestern U.S. city. International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 30(4), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.2190/IQ.30.4.d

7. Bagherzadeh, M., Markovic, S., & Bogers, M. (2021). Managing Open Innovation: A Project-Level Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(1), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2949714

8. Bahemia, H., & Squire, B. (2010). A contingent perspective of open innovation in new product development projects. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(04), 603–627. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919610002799

9. Barak, M., & Usher, M. (2019). The innovation profile of nanotechnology team projects of face-to-face and online learners. Computers & Education, 137, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.012

10. Barbic, F., Jolink, A., Niesten, E., & Hidalgo, A. (2021). Opening and closing open innovation projects: A contractual perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 94, 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.02.014

11. Barbosa, S., Sáiz, P., & Zofío, J. L. (2024). The emergence and historical evolution of innovation networks: On the factors promoting and hampering patent collaboration in technological lagging economies. Research Policy, 53(5), 104990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.104990

12. Berchicci, L. (2013). Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance. Research Policy, 42(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.017

13. Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., Heaton, S., & Teece, D. J. (2019). Strategic Management of Open Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. California Management Review, 62(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619885150

14. Casidy, R., & Nyadzayo, M. (2019). Drivers and outcomes of relationship quality with professional service firms: An SME owner-manager perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 78, 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.09.011

15. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From Technology. В Journal of Engineering and Technology Management—J ENG TECHNOL MANAGE (Т. 21).

16. Cricelli, L., Mauriello, R., & Strazzullo, S. (2023). Preventing open innovation failures: A managerial framework. Technovation, 127, 102833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102833

17. Davis, P., & Love, P. (2011). Alliance contracting: Adding value through relationship development. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 18(5), 444–461. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981111165167

18. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

19. Duanmu, J.-L., & Fai, F. M. (2007). A processual analysis of knowledge transfer: From foreign MNEs to Chinese suppliers. International Business Review, 16(4), 449–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2007.04.004

20. Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251126

21. Dyball, M. C., & Wang, A. F. (2017). The links among characteristics, controls and performance of inter-firm innovation projects. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(06), 1850015. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919618500159

22. Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.6.611.12529

23. Garcez, M. P., Sbragia, R., & Kruglianskas, I. (2014). FACTORS FOR SELECTING PARTNERS IN INNOVATION PROJECTS – QUALITATIVE EVIDENCES FROM NON-EQUITY BILATERAL ALLIANCES IN THE BRAZILIAN PETROCHEMICAL LEADER. Review of Administration and Innovation - RAI, 11(2), 241. https://doi.org/10.5773/rai.v11i2.1292

24. Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 110–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1920110

25. Gkorezis, P., Mousailidis, G., Kostagiolas, P., & Kritsotakis, G. (2021). Harmonious work passion and work-related internet information seeking among nurses: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(8), 2534–2541. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13405

26. Gkypali, A., Filiou, D., & Tsekouras, K. (2017). R&D collaborations: Is diversity enhancing innovation performance? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.015

27. Guertler, M. R., & Sick, N. (2021). Exploring the enabling effects of project management for SMEs in adopting open innovation – A framework for partner search and selection in open innovation projects. International Journal of Project Management, 39(2), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.06.007

28. Hayes, A. F., Montoya, A. K., & Rockwood, N. J. (2017). The analysis of mechanisms and their contingencies: PROCESS versus structural equation modeling. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 25(1), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2017.02.001

29. Holmberg, S. R., & Cummings, J. L. (2009). Building Successful Strategic Alliances: Strategic Process and Analytical Tool for Selecting Partner Industries and Firms. Long Range Planning, 42(2), 164–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.01.004

30. Hong, J. F. L., Zhao, X., & Stanley Snell, R. (2019). Collaborative-based HRM practices and open innovation: A conceptual review. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(1), 31–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1511616

31. Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904

32. Jee, S. J., & Sohn, S. Y. (2020). Patent-based framework for assisting entrepreneurial firms’ R&D partner selection: Leveraging their limited resources and managing the tension between learning and protection. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 57, 101575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101575

33. Keränen, O., Komulainen, H., Lehtimäki, T., & Ulkuniemi, P. (2021). Restructuring existing value networks to diffuse sustainable innovations in food packaging. Industrial Marketing Management, 93, 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.10.011

34. Klimas, P., Sachpazidu, K., Stańczyk, S., Nadolny, M., Grześkowiak, A., & Stanimir, A. (2022). The configuration of inter-organizational relationship features in the life cycle perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(6), 846–867. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-04-2022-0118

35. Kobarg, S., Stumpf-Wollersheim, J., & Welpe, I. M. (2019). More is not always better: Effects of collaboration breadth and depth on radical and incremental innovation performance at the project level. Research Policy, 48(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.014

36. Lakemond, N., Bengtsson, L., Laursen, K., & Tell, F. (2016). Match and manage: The use of knowledge matching and project management to integrate knowledge in collaborative inbound open innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(2), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtw004

37. Lappalainen, L., Aleem, M., & Sandberg, B. (2023). How to manage open innovation projects? An integrative framework. Project Leadership and Society, 4, 100095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2023.100095

38. Lehtimäki, T., & Komulainen, H. (2021). Matching Co-innovation Project Types to Diverse Customer Relationships: Perspective of an Industrial Technology Supplier. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 18(01), 2050048. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877020500480

39. Maroun, W., & Duboisée de Ricquebourg, A. (2024). How auditors identify and report key audit matters—An organizational routines perspective. The British Accounting Review, 56(2), 101263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2023.101263

40. Martinsuo, M., Vuorinen, L., & Killen, C. P. (2024). Project portfolio formation as an organizational routine: Patterns of actions in implementing innovation strategy. International Journal of Project Management, 42(4), 102592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102592

41. Morad, S., Ragonis, N., & Barak, M. (2021). An integrative conceptual model of innovation and innovative thinking based on a synthesis of a literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100824

42. Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252308

43. Najafi-Tavani, S., Najafi-Tavani, Z., Naudé, P., Oghazi, P., & Zeynaloo, E. (2018). How collaborative innovation networks affect new product performance: Product innovation capability, process innovation capability, and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 73, 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.009

44. Niroomand, N., & Jenkins, G. P. (2020). Estimation of households’ and businesses’ willingness to pay for improved reliability of electricity supply in Nepal. Energy for Sustainable Development, 55, 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2020.02.006

45. Nyadzayo, M. W., Mohan, M., & Casidy, R. (2020). Relationship factors and firms’ willingness-to-pay: A comparison of east-west settings. Industrial Marketing Management, 91, 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.10.005

46. Ryoo, J. (2017). Choosing between internal and external development for innovation projects: Antecedents and consequences. Asia Pacific Business Review, 23(1), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2015.1109818

47. Salge, T. O., Farchi, T., Barrett, M. I., & Dopson, S. (2013). When Does Search Openness Really Matter? A Contingency Study of Health‐Care Innovation Projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(4), 659–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12015

48. Shah, R. H., & Swaminathan, V. (2008). Factors influencing partner selection in strategic alliances: The moderating role of alliance context. Strategic Management Journal, 29(5), 471–494. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.656

49. Slowinski, G., & Sagal, M. (2010). Good Practices in Open Innovation. Research-Technology Management, 53, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2010.11657649

50. Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

51. Wei, F., Feng, N., Yang, S., & Zhao, Q. (2020). A conceptual framework of two-stage partner selection in platform-based innovation ecosystems for servitization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121431

52. Zhang, G., & Tang, C. (2017). How could firm’s internal R&D collaboration bring more innovation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.007

53. Zhao, Y., Wang, C., Sun, Y., & Liu, X. (2018). Factors influencing companies’ willingness to pay for carbon emissions: Emission trading schemes in China. Energy Economics, 75, 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.09.001

54. Zineldin, M. (1996). Bank strategic positioning and some determinants of bank selection. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 14(6), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652329610130136