Adam Smith and the twists and turns of economics in Russia
https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-59-6-1
Abstract
Adam Smith, who celebrated his 300th anniversary in 2023, continues to be popular among modern economists. To understand this enduring popularity, scholars have proposed several hypotheses. The main goal of this article is to present the key explanations for Smith’s centurieslong success among social sciences scholars and economists. The authors pay special attention to analyzing the reasons for Smith’s importance in Russian economic discourse. The analysis identifies the main approaches to understanding Smith’s popularity among Russian and postSoviet economists. First, the paper demonstrates that one of the common interpretations connects Smith’s contemporary popularity with his role as a precursor of Karl Marx, whose ideas continue to influence the Russian community of academic economists (RCAE). Second, Smith’s unconventional approach allowed him to easily fit into almost any socio-economic twists Russia’s history is rich of. Third, it is believed that Smith’s success among RCAE is due to his non-instrumental mode of argumentation, which is popular among Russian economists, many of whom haven’t yet mastered modern instrumental methods. Having acknowledged the validity of these perspectives, the authors put forward a hypothesis that links Smith's appeal in Russia, among other factors, to his immense authority. This credibility acts as an intellectual shield and reduces the risks for scholars exploring issues that fall outside of the dominant discourse in different historical periods. These and other hypotheses, as well as recent approaches to interpreting Adam Smith’s works, are considered on the basis of the articles written for this journal issue by the participants of the conference “Economics, Society, and Culture: Adam Smith’s Legacy and Modernity”.
About the Authors
A. A. MaltsevRussian Federation
Moscow
A. S. Tishkin
Russian Federation
Moscow
G. A. Bazhenov
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Anikin, A. (1990). Adam Smith, Russian Thought and our Problems. World Economy and International Relations, 7, 80–86. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-1990-7-80-86
2. Avtonomov, V. S. (2024). “The Doctrine of Civilization” by Academician Storch and its place in the mutual infl uence of Western and Russian economic thought. AlterEconomics, 21(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2024.21-1.2
3. Boettke, P. J. (2024). Why is it necessary to read Adam Smith today? Vestnik MSU. Series 6. Economics, 6, 89–103.
4. Borokh, O. N. (2024). The doctrine of Adam Smith in the Chinese intellectual landscape. Vestnik MSU. Serie 6. Economics, 6, 104–124.
5. Friedman, B. M. (2024). Ideological predecessors of Adam Smith. Vestnik MSU. Series 6. Economics, 6, 78–88.
6. Glovely, G. D., & Minaeva, E. A. (2023). Critical and non-critical Smithianism of Heinrich Storch, or the Right and Left hands of the “system of natural freedom”. Questions of Theoretical Economics, 1, 32-45. https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2023_1_32_45
7. Grebnev, L. S. (2024). Interest (rate): where does the problem arise of? Vestnik MSU. Series 6. Economics, 6, 62–77.
8. Grigoriev, L. M. (2024). Empires of the ancients — a crude instrument of history. Vestnik MSU. Series 6. Economics, 6, 125–160.
9. Kapelyushnikov, R. I. (2023). Many-armed Adam Smith. M.: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics. Preprint WP3/2023/01. https://wp.hse.ru/data/2023/03/14/2037479684/WP3_2023_01________.pdf
10. Khudokormov, A. G. (2024). Adam Smith, Semyon Desnitsky, Ivan Tretyakov: the great economist and Russian pupils. Vestnik MSU. Series 6. Economics, 6, 19–38.
11. Kurtz, H. D. (2024). Adam Smith on the process of civilization and related risks. Vestnik MSU. Series 6. Economics, 6, 187–220.
12. Maltsev, A. A. (2016). Russian community of economists: main features and perspectives. Voprosy ekonomiki, 11, 135–158. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-11-135-158
13. Maltsev, A. A., & Kovalev, A. V. (2020). Theoretical and methodological views of economists in Russia and Belarus: Path Dependence? Journal of Economic Theory, 17(3), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2020.17-3.4
14. Mokhnacheva, Y. V., & Tsvetkova, V. A. (2019). Russia in the world array of scientifi c publications. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 89(8), 820–830. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869-5873898820-830
15. Orekhovsky, P. A. (2024). Adam Smith — a view from the XXI century. Vestnik MSU. Series 6. Economics, 6, 50–61.
16. Paganelli, M. Р. (2024). Adam Smith and the moral content of political economy: interpretation from the standpoint of the theory of public choice. MSU Vestnik. Series 6. Economics, 6, 221–239.
17. Porokhovsky, A. A. (2024). The signifi cance of A. Smith’s “invisible hand” for the development of economic science. MSU Vestnik. Series 6. Economics, 6, 39–49.
18. Smith, V. L. (2024). Adam Smith on benefi cence, justice and society. Vestnik MSU. Series 6. Economics, 6, 240–247.
19. Sokolov, M., & Safonova M. (2024). Economists and Their Fan-clubs: The Distribution of Recognition in Russian Economic Science. Russian Sociological Review, 23(1), 244–227. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2024-1-244-278
20. Volchik, V. V., & Fursa, E. V. (2024). Theory and Ideology in Economic Science: from Adam Smith to Esther Dufl o. Vestnik MSU. Series 6. Economics, 6, 161–186.
Review
For citations:
Maltsev A.A., Tishkin A.S., Bazhenov G.A. Adam Smith and the twists and turns of economics in Russia. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2024;(6):3-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-59-6-1