Cultural codes of the economy at macro and micro levels
https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-60-1-1
Abstract
Numerous empirical studies have demonstrated the influence of cultural factors on economic growth, innovation, human capital, and more. A synthesis of the results from these empirical studies allows for the identification of five cultural codes that have economic significance (the laws of economic efficiency, competitive specialization, diversity, transformation, and the impact of trust). The operation of the last of these laws is associated with alternative opportunities for economic growth, as research by Algan and Cahuc (Algan, Cahuc, 2010) indicated the potential for a 69% increase in GDP per capita in Russia, provided that the level of generalized trust is increased by 2.5 times. According to the author, the reason for persistently low trust is the presence of two cultural cores in Russian economic culture, characterized by individualism in megacities, the Urals, Siberia, and the Far East, and collectivism in other regions of the country. This, on one hand, provides alternative opportunities for different types of modernization (Western and East Asian types). On the other hand, it creates a problem of insufficient trust. The solution to the problem of insufficient trust, according to the field studies presented in the report, is related to the formation of institutions that are hindered by such a sociocultural characteristic of Russia as extremely high uncertainty avoidance. The consequence of this is short planning horizons in Russia, which do not allow for the creation of institutions, especially inclusive-type institutions aimed at attracting investment and human capital. The solution to this problem, in the author’s opinion, is related to the transition to a «3D culture,» meaning first achieving a long-term perspective through the development of a «culture of failure», then achieving a higher level of trust among the majority of people, which should yield significant economic effects, and finally addressing the issue of willingness to negotiate, transforming compromise from a negative connotation to a positive one, which represents the most complex task due to the presence of different cultural cores. The article further illustrates the implementation of the principles of 3D culture at the macro level in the strategy for developing financial culture until 2030 and at the micro level in the analysis of corporate culture in various companies
References
1. Antonov, E. V., Auzan, A. A., Bryzgalin, V. A., Voronenko, V. A., Zolotov, A. V., Nikishina, E. N., Pripuzova, & N. A., Trukhachev, S. A. (2019). Sociocultural factors of innovative activity of the population. Moscow: Institute of National Projects; Russian Venture Company.
2. Auzan, A. A. (2022). Cultural codes of the economy: how values affect competition, democracy and the welfare of the people Moscow: AST
3. Auzan, A. A. (PhD). Institutional economics. https://books.econ.msu.ru/Institutionaleconomics/
4. Auzan, A. A. (ed.). (2005). Institutional economics: a new institutional economic theory. M.: INFRA-M
5. Auzan, A. A., & Nikishina, E. N. (2021). Socio-cultural economics: how culture affects the economy, and the economy affects culture: a course of lectures. Faculty of Economics of Lomonosov Moscow State University
6. Weber, M. (1990) Selected works M.: Progress
7. Gumilev, L. N. (1990). Geography of the ethnos in the historical period. L.: Publishing House of LSU
8. Trust in Russian business. (2023). Institute of National Projects, Skolkovo https://Доверие_в_российском_бизнесе_2024_Skolkovo_Noôdome.pdf
9. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, K. (2011). Modernization, cultural values and democracy: the sequence of human development M.: New Edition
10. Kartaev, F. S. (n. d.). Friendly econometrics. https://books.econ.msu.ru/Introductionto-Econometrics/
11. Kuzminov, Ya. I., Bendukidze, K. A., & Yudkevich, M. M. (ed.). (2005) The course of institutional economics: institutions, networks, transaction costs, contracts. Higher School of Economics
12. Lebedeva, N. M., & Yasin, E. G. (2009). Culture and innovation: towards a problem s a emen . Foresight, 3 (2)
13. Lotman, Y. M. (1993). “Contract” and “self-presentation” as archetypal models of culture. In the book by Y. M. Lotman (ed.), Selected articles: in 3 vols. 3. Tallinn: Alexandra. pp. 345–355
14. Polterovich, V. (2012). Designing reforms: How to search for intermediate institutions (reform design: How to search for interim institutions). Montenegrin Economic Journal, 8 (3), 5 1
15. Polterovich, V. M. (2001). Transplantation of economic institutions. Economics of Modern Russia, (3)
16. Polterovich, V. M. (2016). Institutions of catch-up development (to the draft of a new model of economic development in Russia). Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast, 5 (47)
17. Polterovich, V. M., & Popov, V. V. (2007). Democratization and economic growth. Social Sciences and Modernity, 2, 13–27
18. Sociocultural factors of innovative development in the conditions of the coronacrisis [Research report] (2020) / Auzan, A. A., Bakhtigaraeva, A. I., Bogdanova, A. A., Bryzgalin, V. A., Zelnitskaya, E. N., Zolotov, A. V., Nikishina, E. N., Drugina, V. P., Pripuzova, N. A., Sitkevich, D. A., Trushina, V. S. M.: Institute of National Projects; Russian Venture Company.
19. Huntington, S. (2003). The Clash of civilizations Translated from the English by T. Velimeeva, Yu. Novikova. M.: AST
20. Yasin, E. G., & Snegovaya, M. V. (2009). Tectonic shifts in the global economy: what the cultural factor will say Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics
21. Yasin, E., & Snegovaya, M. (2009). Institutional and cultural constraints of catching up countries Economic Issues, 11, 2–49
Review
For citations:
Auzan A.A. Cultural codes of the economy at macro and micro levels. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2025;(1):3–18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-60-1-1