The Algorithm for the Commercialization Process of Developments in Research Organizations
https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105201757
Abstract
The article deals with the notion of «commercialization of technologies» and provides the interpretation of the term given by different scholars. The article examines the existing methods of commercialization of scientific developments. One of the main constraints to the technological entrepreneurship development is the wrongly chosen commercialization form of scientific developments. In addition, existing commercialization methods are not sufficiently effective. Therefore, the purpose of the paper is to provide a detailed examination of most commonly used methods of scientific developments commercializing and to develop an algorithm of action in the commercialization process to successfully launch a product on the market. Drawing on prior foreign and Russian studies of commercialization forms, we can identify 7 most commonly used forms of commercialization. The article describes each method in graphical and verbal format, compares various forms of commercialization of scientific developments in line with the factors critical for each model.
About the Author
S. A. Karpycheva
National research University "Higher school of Economics"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Антонец В. Л., Нечаева Н. В., Хомкин К. А. Инновационный бизнес: формирование моделей коммерциализации перспективных разработок. - М.: Дело, 2009. - 320 с.
2. Баранчеев В. П. Система коммерциализации технологий // Менеджмент сегодня. - 2006. - 1. - С. 14-28.
3. Житенко Е. Д. Трансферт технологий: причины успеха // ЭКО. - 2002. - 6. - С. 75-86.
4. Крутиков В. К., Дорожкина Т. В., Шахметова Е. А. Совершенствование механизма эффективной коммерциализации результатов научных исследований: кластер фармацевтики, биомедицины и биотехнологий // Региональная экономика: теория и практика. - 2013. - 40 (319). - С. 15-25.
5. Кудрявцева Т. Ю., Коваленко Я. В. Проблемы процесса коммерциализации инноваций в России. Сборник научных трудов 17-й международной научно-практической конференции. Санкт-Петербургский политехнический университет Петра Великого, 2016. - С. 223-232.
6. Лихолетов А. В., Лихолетов В. В., Пестунов М. А. Стратегии, модели и формы коммерциализации объектов интеллектуальной собственности // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. - 2009. - 9. - С. 19-27.
7. Прахар Я. Лицензирование как стратегия выхода на рынок и в глобальные цепочки поставок // Проблемы развития территории. - 2013. - 1 (63). - С. 54-61.
8. Российская служба государственной статистики.
9. Audretsch D. B. Innovation, Growth and Survival // International Journal of Industrial Organization. - 1995. - 6. - Р. 441-457.
10. Audretsch D. B., Lehmann E. E., Wright M. Technology transfer in a global economy // The Journal of Technology Transfer. - 2012. - 5. - Р. 1-12.
11. Audretsch D. B., Thurik A. R. Capitalism and Democracy in the 21st Century: From the Managed to the Entrepreneurial Economy // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. - 2000. - 2. - 17-34.
12. Bauer S. M., Flagg J. F. Technology transfer and technology transfer intermediaries // Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits. - 2010. - Summer 1 (6). - Р. 129-150.
13. Bjorkdahl J., Linder M. Formulating problems for commercializing new technologies: The case of environmental innovation // Scandinavian journal of management. - 2015. - 31. - Р. 14-24.
14. Bjerke B. A model of technological entrepreneurship. Understanding entrepreneurship. - Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. Usa, 2007.
15. Bozeman B. Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory // Research policy. - 2000. - 29. - Р. 627-655.
16. Bradley S. R., Hayter C. S., Link A. N. Models and methods of university technology transfer // Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship. - 2013. - 9 (6). - Р. 571-650.
17. Carree M., Martin A., Thurik A. R. The Impact of Entrepreneurship on Economic Growth // Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, 2010. - Р. 557-594.
18. Chepurenko A. Informal entrepreneurship under transition: causes and specific features. B. Dieter (eds.). - Springer Verlag, 2014. - Р. 383.
19. Dorf R. C., Byers T. H. Technology Ventures: from Idea to Enterprise. - New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005.
20. Dutta S., Lanvin B., Wunsch-Vincent S. The global innovation index 2016. Effective innovation policies for development, 2016.
21. Dutta S., Lanvin B., Wunsch-Vincent S. The global innovation index 2017. Effective innovation policies for development, 2017.
22. Friedman J., Silberman J. University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter? // Journal of Technology Transfer. - 2003. - 28. - Р. 17-30.
23. Gudanowska A. E. Modern Research Trends within Technology Management in the Light of Selected Publications // Procedia Engineering. - 2017. - 182. - Р. 247-254.
24. Gulbranson C. A., Audretsch D. B. Proof of concept centers: accelerating the commercialization of university innovation // Journal of Technology Transfer. - 2008. - 33. - Р. 249-258.
25. Heinzl J., Kor A. L., Orange G., & Kaufmann H. Technology transfer model for Austrian higher education institutions // The Journal of Technology Transfer. - 2012. - Р. 1-34.
26. Hockaday T. University technology transfer - models, components and frameworks, 2014.
27. Howells J. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation // Research Policy. - 2006. - 35. - Р. 715-728.
28. Hsu D. W. L., Shen Y. C., Yuan B. J. C., Chou C. J. Toward successful commercialization of university technology: Performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan // Technological forecasting & social change. - 2015. - 92. - Р. 25-39.
29. Jeong S., Lee S. and Kim Y. Licensing versus selling in transactions for exploiting patented technological knowledge assets in the markets for technology // The Journal of Technology Transfer. - 2013. - 38. - Р. 251-272.
30. Landry R., Amara N., Cloutier J-S., Halilem N. Technology transfer organizations: Services and business models // Technovation. - 2013. - 33. - Р. 431-449.
31. Li J., Matlay H. Chinese entrepreneurship and small business development: an overview and research agenda // Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. - 2006. - 13 (2). - Р. 248-262.
32. Necoechea-Mondragon H., Pineda-Dominguez D., Soto-Flores R. A conceptual model of technology transfer for public universities in Mexico // Journal of technology management & innovation. - 2013. - 8. - Р. 24-35.
33. Rolfo S., Finardi U. University Third mission in Italy: organization, faculty attitude and academic specialization // The Journal of Technology Transfer. - 2012. - Р. 1-15.
34. Sari K., Alamsyah P., Asmara A. Y., Mulatsih S., Kusnandar. Critical Role of Intermediaries on Technology Transfer: Case Study of BIOTROP and Center for Mariculture Development of Lampung // Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi. - 2017. - 16(1). - Р. 33-45.
35. Wahab S. A., Rose R. C., Uli J., Abdullah H. A review on the technology transfer models, knowledge-based and organizational learning models on technology transfer // European Journal of Social Sciences. - 2009. - 10 (4). - Р. 549- 564.
Review
For citations:
Karpycheva S.A. The Algorithm for the Commercialization Process of Developments in Research Organizations. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2017;(5):125-144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105201757
Views:
351
Email this article 