Innovations Potential of Cultural Production and Issues of its Development in Cultural Policy of CIS countries
https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105201847
Abstract
The objective of the paper is the determination of the opportunities to realize the cultural policies in the CIS countries to activate their innovations. The conceptual basis of such a course are the theories about the position of cultural production in the social-economic systems and its influence over their innovative development. In lens of their application opportunities this approach facilitated the appraisal of the cultural policy in the Post-soviet space and the design of the general attitude towards its transformation to stimulate efficiently the innovative development of the countries of the Region. The Methodological principles of the research are based on the systems theory, comparative studies and the evolution theories. The research was concluded recognizing the innovation potential of the cultural sector neglected in the countries policies of the countries of the region. Hence the main directions of the cultural policy transformation to activate innovations were indicated. The conclusions of the analysis may be operated while the elaboration and materialization of the cultural and innovation policies at the national and regional levels.
About the Author
E. L. Moreva
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Государственная программа Беларуси «Культура Беларуси» на 2016- 2020 годы // Постановление Совета Министров Республики Беларусь от 04.03.2016 № 180.
2. Закон республики Армения об основах культурного законодательства. Принят 20.11.2002.
3. Межгосударственная программа инновационного сотрудничества государств - участников СНГ на период до 2020 года. - СПб., 2011.
4. Основные мероприятия сотрудничества государств - участников Содружества Независимых Государств в области культуры на 2016-2020 годы, Республика Казахстан, 2015.
5. План приоритетных мероприятий в сфере гуманитарного сотрудничества государств - участников СНГ на 2017-2018 годы от 28.10.2016.
6. План действий Правительства на 2016-2018 годы // Постановление Правительства от 20.07.2016 № 890. Республика Молдова.
7. Программа Правительства Кыргызской Республики по развитию сферы культуры до 2020 года // Постановление Правительства КР от 27.10.2015 № 736.
8. Стратегия государственной культурной политики на период до 2030 года // Распоряжение Правительства Российской Федерации от 29.02.2016 № 326-р.
9. Морева Е. Л. Креативность как инновационный фактор // Россия: тенденции и перспективы развития. Ежегодник. Вып. 12 / РАН. ИНИОН; отв. ред. В. И. Герасимов. - М., 2017. - Ч. 2. - 992 с. - С. 445-460.
10. Conference Board of Canada. Valuing Culture: Measuring and Understanding Canada’s Creative Economy. - Ottawa, ON, 2008.
11. CREATIVE ECONOMY REPORT USA, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 2013. URL: http://tcdc2.undp.org/GSSDAcademy/ Upload/CER13_Report_web_optimized.pdf (аccess: 01.04.2018).
12. Crociata A., Lilla M., Sacco P. Recycling waste: Does culture matter? mimeo, IULM University. - Milan, 2011.
13. Department for Culture, Media & Sport. Creative industries mapping document. Department of Culture, Media and Sport. - UK: London, 1998.
14. Evans G. Creative cities, creative spaces and urban policy // Urban Studies. - 2009. - No. 46. - P. 1003-1040.
15. Howkins J. The Creative Economy: How People Make Money From Ideas. - London, UK: Penguin, 2001.
16. Jaffe E., Nebenzahl I. National image and competitive advantage, second edition. - Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press, 2006.
17. Joffe A. Cultural and creative industries. The Cultural Economy Presentation to UNESCO experts meeting Cape Town 21-26 October 2012 UNESCO EXPERT. URL: http://slideplayer.com/slide/3463854/ (access: 01.03.2018).
18. KEA The Economy of Culture, KEA European Affairs for the European Commission. - Bruxelles, 2006.
19. KEA The impact of culture on creativity. - Bruxelles, KEA European Affairs, 2009.
20. KEA Creating, innovating, disrupting through A&B organizations. - Bruxelles, KEA European Affairs, 2014.
21. Koonlaan B., Bygren L., Johansson S. Visiting the cinema, concerts, museums or art exhibitions as determinant of survival: A Swedish fourteen-year cohort follow-up // Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. - 2000. - No. 28. - P. 174-178.
22. Mason M. The pirate’s dilemma: How youth culture is reinventing capitalism. - N.Y.: The Free Press, 2008.
23. Monetizing digital media, Ernst & Young, 2010. URL: http://www.ey.com/ Publication/vwLUAssets/Monetizing_digital_media/$File/Monetizing_digital_ media.pdf (аccess: 01.03.2018).
24. Potts J. Art and innovation: An evolutionary view of the creative industries // UNESCO Observatory. - 2007. - 1(1). - Р. 1-18. URL: http://sutanto.staff.uns. ac.id/files/2008/09/art_innovation.pdf (аccess: 01.03.2018).
25. Sacco Р. Culture 3.0: A new perspective for the EU 2014-2020 structural funds programming. European Expert Network on Culture (EENC), 2011.
26. Solis E. The complete guide for brands and businesses to build, cultivate, and measure success in the new web, revised edition. - N.Y.: Wiley, 2011.
27. Tapscott D., Williams A. Wikinomics. How mass collaboration changes everything. - N.Y.: Portfolio, 2006.
28. Throsby D. Economics and Culture. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
29. Throsby D. The concentric circles model of the cultural industries // Cultural Trends. - 2008. - No. 17. - P. 147-164.
30. The Cultural Economy. The Cultures and Globalization. Series 2 / H. Anheier, Y. Isar (eds). - London: SAGE Publications, 2008.
31. UNCTAD. Creative Industries and Development, 2004. URL: http://www.unctad. org/en/docs/tdxibpd13_en.pdf (аccess: 01.03.2018)
32. UNCTAD. URL: http://unctadstat.unctad.org (аccess: 01.07.2017).
33. World Intellectual Property Organization. Guide on Surveying the Economic Contribution of the Copyright Industries, WIPO. - Geneva, 2003.
Review
For citations:
Moreva E.L. Innovations Potential of Cultural Production and Issues of its Development in Cultural Policy of CIS countries. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2018;(4):122-146. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105201847
Views:
314
Email this article 