Role of planning in modernization development: evidence of the Republic of Korea
https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202013
Abstract
Active application of modern digital technologies is impossible without creating high technological basis for Russia’s economy, capable of effective implementation of such technologies. These processes assume the implementation of radical structural and technological modernization conversions applying different planning methods within the framework of state industrial policy. The most expressed forms of planning have been used by developed and «catching–up» economies primarily during radical modernization reforms. In this context, appealing to overseas planning experience seems to be of great interest. On the basis of foreign experts’ estimates, the author analyses the main directions in planning during the period of accelerated industrial-technological transformation in South Korea in the context of its possible use in Russia’s technological modernization. The experience of planning in South Korea is of special interest because it demonstrates the transformation in planning functions and methods according to the changes in socio-economic situation in the country and modernization goals set by the Government at different stages of development.
References
1. Ukaz Prezidenta Rossijskoj Federacii № 204 ot 7 maja 2018 g. «O nacional’nyh celjah i strategicheskih zadachah razvitija Rossijskoj Federacii na period do 2024 goda». — http://prezident.org/articles/ukaz-prezidenta-rf-204-ot-7-maja-2018-goda-07-05-2018.html
2. Polterovich V. K obshei teorii social’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Chast’1: geografiya, instituti ili kul’tura // Voprosi ekonomiki. — 2018. — № 11. — S. 5–27.
3. Polterovich V. Kuda idti: 24 tezisa // Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii. — 2014. — № 3 (66). — S. 7–16.
4. Rassadina A. Planirovanie kak instrument gosudarstvennoj promyshlennoj politiki: opyt Francii // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 6: Jekonomika. — № 1. — S. 122–140.
5. Cifrovaja jekonomika: kratkij statisticheskij sbornik / G. I. Abdrahmanova, L. M. Gohberg, A. V. Dem’janova i dr.; Nac. issled. un-t «Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki». — M.: NIU VShJe, 2018.
6. Bilateral Trade in Goods by Industry and End-use (accessed in July 2017) — BTDIxE. URL: http://oe.cd/btd
7. Cave M. Macro-Economic Projections and the French Plan. — London: Brunel University, 1981.
8. Cohen S. Modern Capitalist Planning. The French Model. Berkeley. — Calif, 1969.
9. Enos J., Park W. The Adoption and Diffusion of Imported Technology: The Case of Korea. — London: Croom Helm, 1988.
10. Estrin S, Holmes P. French Planning in Theory and Practice. — London: George Allen and Unwin, 1983.
11. Government of the Republic of Korea. The Fifth Five-Year Economic and Social Development Plan, 1982–1986. — Seoul, 1982.
12. Government of the Republic of Korea. The Sixth Five-Year Economic and Social Development Plan, 1987–1992. — Seoul, 1992.
13. International Federation of Robotics (IFR), February 2017. URL: https://ifr.org/
14. Jones L., Sa Kong, I. Government, Business and Entrepreneurship in Economic Development: The Case of Korea. — Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1980.
15. Komiya R. Planning in Japan. In Morris Bornstein, Ed. Economic Planning, East and West. — Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1975. — P. 189–227.
16. Korea Development Institute, Korea, Year 2000: Prospects and Issues for Long-Term Development. — Seoul, 1986.
17. Korea Development Institute. Long-Term Prospect for Economic and Social Development. — Seoul, 1978, 1987.
18. Kuznets P. The Dramatic Reversal of 1979-80: Contemporary Economic Development in Korea // Northeast Asian Studies. — 1982. — Sept. — P. 71–87.
19. Kwon S. Review of Current Social Development Policy and Planning. Working Paper No. 8930. — Seoul: Korea Development Institute. — September, 1989.
20. Miller J. Meade on Indicative Planning // Journal of Comparative Economics. — 1979. — Nо. 3. — P. 27–35.
21. Murrell P. Planning and Coordination of Economic Policy in Market Economies // Journal of Comparative Economics. — 1979. — June, N3, 2. — P. 145–166.
22. Myrdal G. Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations. — New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1968.
23. OECD 2017o. — OECD Digital Economy Outlook, 2017. — OECD Publishing, Paris. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264276284-en
24. OECD 2017p. — Digital security incidents experienced by businesses, 2010 or later. — OECD Digital Economy Outlook, 2017. — OECD Publishing, Paris. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888933586426
25. Petri P. Korea’s Export Niche: Origins and Prospects // World Development. — 1988 — 16, Jan. — P. 47–63.
26. The first five FYPs and their adjusted (revised) versions: Bank of Korea. National income in Korea, various issues.
27. World Bank, World Development Report. 1989. — Washington, DC, 1989.
Review
For citations:
Rassadina A.K. Role of planning in modernization development: evidence of the Republic of Korea. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2020;(1):197-214. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202013
Views:
239
Email this article 