Demographic Reflections on the Digital Economy
https://doi.org/10.38050/013001052019611
Abstract
The article describes the demographic context of the development of the digital economy in Russia, systematizes the directions of the possible impact of the digitalization of the economy on demographic processes, analyzes the prerequisites for the inequality of different demographic groups in the near future in the digital reality. Based on the analysis of statistical data and expert assessments, a systematic view on the mutual impact of the digitalization of the economy and demographic development is proposed for the first time, a number of questions are raised about the possible strengthening of inequality of individual socio-demographic groups in the process of digitalization. It is shown that the demographic context can play a significant role in the digitalization of the economy, which, in turn, affects the demographic development and digital inequality.
References
1. Ukaz Prezidenta Rossijskoj Federacii № 490 ot 10.10.2019 «O razvitii iskusstvennogo intellekta v Rossijskoj Federacii».
2. Nacional’naya programma «Cifrovaya ekonomika Rossijskoj Federacii». Protokol zasedaniya prezidiuma Soveta pri Prezidente Rossijskoj Federacii po strategicheskomu razvitiyu i nacional’nym proektam ot 04.07.2019 № 7.
3. Programma «Cifrovaya ekonomika Rossijskoj Federacii». Rasporyazhenie Pravitel’stva Rossijskoj Federacii ot 28.07.2017 № 1632-r.
4. Atlas professij. Agentstvo strategicheskih iniciativ. — M., 2015.
5. Demograficheskie vyzovy Rossii. Ekspertno-analiticheskij doklad. — M.: Centr strategicheskih razrabotok, 2017.
6. Zubarevich N. V. Koncentraciya naseleniya i ekonomiki v stolicah postsovetskih stran // Regional’nye issledovaniya. — 2017. — 1(55). — S. 4–15.
7. Intellektual‘naya migraciya v sovremennom mire: ucheb. posobie / pod red. M.M. Lebedevoj; Mosk. gos. in-t mezhdunar. otnoshenij (un-t) MID Rossii, kaf. mirovyh politicheskih processov. — M.: MGIMO-Universitet, 2014.
8. Kalabihina I. E. Demograficheskaya volna rozhdenij i budushchie kolebaniya chislennosti naseleniya v raznyh vozrastnyh gruppah: vyzovy dlya social’noj politiki // Ekonomicheskie strategii. — 2015. — № 2. — S. 50–57.
9. Lejzerovich E. E. Hod koncentracii naseleniya v central’nyh chastyah sub”ektov RF posle 1990 goda. Transformaciya rossijskogo prostranstva: social’no-ekonomicheskie i prirodno-resursnye faktory (polimasshtabnyj analiz). Sbornik dokladov XXV sessii MARS / red. S. S. Artobolevskij, L. M. Sincerov. — M.: IG RAN, 2008. — S. 173–181.
10. Mironova, A. A., Prokof‘eva, L. M. Sem‘ya i domohozyajstvo v Rossii: demograficheskij aspekt // Demograficheskoe obozrenie. — 2018. — 5(2). — S. 103–121.
11. Muslimov M. Cifrovoe zdravoohranenie kak faktor revolyucionnyh preobrazovanij v otrasli. 09.10.2018. OOO «Delovaya Rossiya».
12. Naselenie Rossii 2016. Dvadcat‘ chetvertyj ezhegodnyj demograficheskij doklad. Otv. redaktor S.V.Zaharov. — M.: Izd. Dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki, 2018.
13. Orlov M. V. Formy realizacii instituta prav sobstvennosti v sovremennoj mirovoj ekonomike // Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo social’no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta. — 2011. — № 1. — S. 137–139.
14. Perevedencev V. I. Metody izucheniya migracii naseleniya. — M.: Nauka, 1975.
15. Sem’i s det’mi v Rossii: uroven’ zhizni i politika social’noj podderzhki: dokl. k XX Apr. mezhdunar. nauch. konf. po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva, Moskva, 9–12 apr. 2019 g. / pod red. L. N. Ovcharovoj. — M.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki, 2019.
16. SHinyaeva O. V., Poletaeva O. V., Slepova O. M. Informacionno-cifrovoe neravenstvo: poiski effektivnyh praktik adaptacii naseleniya // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya : ekonomicheksie i social’nye peremeny. — 2019. — № 4. URL: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2019.4.04
17. Ekonomika sovmestnogo pol’zovaniya (ESP) v Rossii-2018. Materialy Rossijskoj associacii elektronnyh kommunikacij. 2018. URL: https://raec.ru/activity/analytics/9845/ (data obrashcheniya: 08.10.2019).
18. Andrews D., Criscuolo C., Gal P. N. The Best versus the Rest: The Global Productivity Slowdown, Divergence across Firms and the Role of Public Policy. OECD Productivity Working Papers. 2016-05. OECD Publishing, Paris.
19. Becker Gary. A treatise on the family. — Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1991.
20. Billari F. C., Giuntella O., Stella L. Does broadband Internet affect fertility? // Population studies. — 2019. — 1-20.
21. Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index. 2019. URL: https://digiconomist.net/bitcoinenergy-consumption (дата обращения: 03.10.2019).
22. Estiria H., Zaghenib E.Age matters: Ageing and household energy demand in the United States // Energy Research & Social Science. — 2019. — 55. — 62–70.
23. Forget car-sharing. In China, you can rent umbrellas, basketballs, washers — for a fee// The Washington Post. — 2018. August 18.
24. Gál R. I., Vanhuysse P., Vargha L. Pro-elderly welfare states within child-oriented societies// Journal of European Public Policy. — 2018. — 25(6). — 944–958.
25. GEM. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2011. Donna J. Kelley, Slavica Singer, Mike Herrington, and the Global Entrepreneurship Research Association, 2012.
26. Jones B. F. Age and great invention // Review of Economics and Statistics. 2010. 92(1). — 1-14.
27. Lesthaeghe R. The unfolding story of the second demographic transition // Population and development review. — 2010.— Vol. 36. — No. 2. — 211–251.
28. Levesque M., Minniti M. The effect of aging on entrepreneurial behavior // Journal of Business Venturing. — 2006 (21). — 177–194.
29. Maslov A. A review of studies on the economic effects of the implementation of telemedicine technologies // Population and Economics. — 2018. — 2(2): — 41–77.
30. Mason A. Demographic Transition and Demographic Dividends in Developed and Developing Countries. United Nations, 2007.
31. Matyushina D., Kalabikhina I. A study of the population’s attitude to telemedicine technologies on the example of online medical consultations // Population and Economics. — 2018. — 2(2). — 78–109.
32. Mkrtchyan N. V. Migration in rural areas of Russia: territorial differences // Population and Economics. — 2019. — 3(1). — 39–51.
33. Trеivish A. I. Geographical space as a mediator between population and economy // Population and Economics. — 2019. — 3(1). — 5-20.
34. World Population Prospects. United Nation, 2019.
35. Zelinsky W. The hypothesis of the mobility transition// Geographical Review. — 1971. — 61. — 219-49.
36. Zemtsov S., Barinova V., Semenova R. The Risks of Digitalization and the Adaptation of Regional Labor Markets in Russia // Foresight and STI Governance. — 2019. — Vol. 13. — No. 2. — 84–96.
Review
For citations:
Kalabikhina I.E. Demographic Reflections on the Digital Economy. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2019;(6):147-166. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/013001052019611
Views:
300
Email this article 