Sustainable development strategies vs traditional approaches: public preferences
https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202067
Abstract
The article describes the methodological approach to the development of strategies of socio-economic development created by the authors on the basis of the analysis of the best practices of sustainable development strategies in the world. The methodology involves the use of ecological and economic (the solid core of the ecological economics, projects with integrated efficiency) and humanistic (indicators of “true well-being”, human experience at the center of change) principles, as well as the use of direct democracy tools (residents are co-authors of strategies, in-depth interviews, online polls with alternative scenarios). The use of this methodology while producing strategies for socio-economic development, including conducting surveys of the population in Kerch, Simferopol and Tolyatti, showed that residents choose the solutions that are laid down in the sustainable development strategies of the leading cities of the world. Surveys regarding the image of the desired future, sustainable city, sustainable mobility and sustainable urban environment showed that residents respond not only progressively and professionally, but also in a consolidated manner choosing the sustainable development path as the only desired vector for long-term development. The main party uninterested in the implementation of the sustainability agenda is a conservative bureaucracy focused on familiar and simple measures and decisions.
About the Authors
V. M. KomarovRussian Federation
V. M. Komarov
Moscow
V. A. Kotsubinskiy
Russian Federation
V. A. Kotsubinskiy
Moscow
V. V. Akimova
Russian Federation
V. V. Akimova
Moscow
References
1. Administracija Kerchi. Strategija social’no-jekonomicheskogo razvitija municipal’nogo obrazovanija gorodskoj okrug Kerch’ Respubliki Krym do 2030 goda. (utverzhdena Resheniem № 1638-1/19 ot 28.06.2019 Kerchenskogo gorodskogo soveta).
2. Administracija Simferopolja. Strategija social’no-jekonomicheskogo razvitija municipal’nogo obrazovanija gorodskoj okrug Simferopol’ Respubliki Krym na period do 2030 goda (utverzhdena Resheniem Simferopol’skogo gorodskogo soveta № 1462 ot 19.12.2017).
3. Administracija Tol’jatti. Strategija social’no-jekonomicheskogo razvitija municipal’nogo obrazovanija gorodskoj okrug Tol’jatti na period do 2030 goda. (utverzhdena Resheniem № 131 ot 25.01.2019 Dumy gorodskogo okruga Tol’jatti).
4. Administracija Jalty. Strategija social’no-jekonomicheskogo razvitija municipal’nogo obrazovanija gorodskoj okrug Jalta Respubliki Krym do 2030 goda. (utverzhdena Resheniem № 1 ot 03.12.2018 Jaltinskogo gorodskogo soveta pervogo sozyva Respubliki Krym).
5. Varlamov I. A. 100 shagov k prevrashcheniyu Simferopolya v luchshij gorod mira // varlamov.ru. 12.10.2017. URL: https://varlamov.ru/2603589.html
6. Komarov V. M. Krizis i pandemija COVID-19 kak okno vozmozhnostej dlja gumanizacii gradostroitel’noj politiki // Monitoring jekonomicheskoj situacii v Rossii. — 2020. — № 8 (110). — S. 17–27.
7. Komarov V. M. Kak «strategii razvitija» zashhishhajut interesy rjadovyh grazhdan // IA REGNUM. 08.03.2019, interv’ju. URL: https://regnum.ru/news/polit/2583266.html
8. Komarov V. M., Kocjubinskij V. A. Proekt Koncepcija sozdanija federal’nogo kurortnogo centra Juzhnogo berega Kryma «Vserossijskaja zdravnica» // Centr strategij regional’nogo razvitija IPJeI RANHiGS. 14.02.2017. URL: https://www.ranepa.ru/images/News/2018-06/05-06-2018-4-krym-conception.pdf
9. Prokof’eva A. V., Lebedeva-Nesevrja N. A. Formirovanie zdorov’eorientirovannogo gorodskogo prostranstva kak sposob upravlenija riskami zdorov’ju naselenija // Analiz riska zdorov’ju. — 2018. — № 3. — S. 144–155.
Review
For citations:
Komarov V.M., Kotsubinskiy V.A., Akimova V.V. Sustainable development strategies vs traditional approaches: public preferences. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2020;(6):124-146. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202067