Preview

Moscow University Economics Bulletin

Advanced search

Subjective inequality perception: stages, methodology, contemporary research objectives

https://doi.org/10.38050/013001052022411

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the development of concept and methodology of subjective inequality perception. We use bothforeign or domestic publications to compare the phases and directions of subjective inequality research in Russia and abroad. Correlating the directions of investigations with the challengers of a concrete historical period and key goals of socio-economic policy we show how new problems have been taken into consideration and the recommendations for public policy appear to be more diverse. Specifying the subjective inequality assessment in post-Soviet Russia we come to the conclusion that the subjective estimates, and subjective perception of non-monetary inequality first of all, should be used more actively in government policy advise as obtaining the key importance not only for the socio-economic stability but also for future sustainable development of Russian Federation.

About the Authors

T. A. Drobyshevskaya
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

PhD, Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics.

Moscow



N. A. Rozinskaya
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

PhD, Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics.

Moscow



References

1. Bondarenko, N. V. (1997). Modeling the poverty line: dynamic and structural aspects. Information bulletin of Russian Public Opinion Research Center, 1 (27), 14–23.

2. Gordon, L. A. (1994). Four kinds of Russian poverty.Journal of sociology, 4,18–35.

3. Gordon, L. A., Terehin, A. T., & Budilova, E. V. (1998a). An attempt of multilateral description of population economic diff erentiation. Part 1. Monitoring of public opinion, 1(33), 43–54.

4. Gordon, L.A, Terehin, A. T., & Budilova, E. V. (1998b). An attempt of multilateral description of population economic diff erentiation. Part 2. Monitoring of public opinion, 2(34), 17–22.

5. Gorshkov, M. K., Kozyreva, P. M., Li, P., & Chernish, M. F. (2021). Comparative Study of Social Equality and Justice in China and Russia. FCTAS RAS: Novyy Chronograph. https://doi.org/10.19181/monogr.978-5-94881-514-5.2021

6. Dybcina, V., & Shashnov, S. A. (1995). On socio-economic diff erentiation of population in Russian Federation and its concrete regions.Problems of statistics, 2,74–77.

7. Zaslavskaja, T. I. (1995). New data on incomes of Russian citizens. Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social change, 4,7–16.

8. Zubova, L., Kovaleva, N., & Krasil’nikova, M. (1993). Dinamics of economic situation of Russian citizens. Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social change,2, 20–21.

9. Kesel’man, L. E., & Mackevich, M. G. (1998). Individual economic optimism/pessimism in transforming society.Journal of Sociology, 1-2,39–54.

10. Kirk, T. C., & Maksimova, L. A. (2017). GULAG Returnees: Memory, History, Identity. Tyumen State University Herald: Humanities, 3 (4), 173–183.

11. Kiryukhin, D. (2018). Inequality and its perception.Ideology and Politics Journal, 2(10), 33–79.

12. Kiruta, A., & Shevjakov, A. (1996). Socio-economic diff erentiation, real living standard and real poverty of families in Russian Federation. Analysis of dynamics and cross-regional analysis.Monitoring of socio-economic potencial of families. Stat. Bjulleten, II quater, 231–274.

13. Mareeva, S. V., Slobodenyuk, E. D., & Anikin, V. A. (2022). Public Tolerance for Social Inequalities in Turbulent Russia: Reassessing the Role of Subjective Mobility. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes,1, 39–60. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2022.1.1982.

14. Nemirovskaya, A. V., & Soboleva, N. E. (2020). Determinants of subjective well-being in Russia: a regional perspective. Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology, 11(2), 54–81.https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2020.11.2.641

15. Ovcharova, L., Turuntsev, E., & Korchagina, I. (1997).Poverty indicators system in Russia in the period of transition. Economics Education and Research Consortium project report. http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/500/659/1219/wp_98-04R.pdf

16. Oleinik, A. N. (2001).Life «by the rules»: institutional analysis of everyday life of the ordinary Russian. http://www.civisbook.ru/files/File/Oleinyk_2001_2.pdf

17. Piketti, T. (2015).Capital in XXI century. Ad Marginem Press. Poluhina, E. V. (2020). “Sense of inequality”: what is the subjective inequality and how to study it.Interaction. Interview. Interpretation, 12(2),81–90.

18. Reutov, J. V. (2018). Social Inequality in Russian Society: Objective and Subjective Dimension. XXI Ural sociological readings “regional social space and time: stable development issues. International conference paper, Yekaterinburg. (pp. 244–247). University of humanities in Yekaterinburg.

19. Rimashevskaja, N. M. (2003). Individual and reform: secrets of survival. Institute of Socio Economic Studies of Population Russian Academy of Science.

20. Stiglic, D., Sen, A., & Fitussi, Zh.-P. (2015). Mis-measuring Our Lives. Why GDP Doesn ’t Add Up. Gajdar Institute Press.

21. Hahulina, L. A. (1998). Subjective aspects in the middle-class formation process in contemporary Russia. In Middle class in contemporary Russia: problems and perspectives, Institute for the Economy in Transition Working Papers, 9, 28–35.

22. Shevjakov, A., & Kiruta, A. (1999). Economic inequality, living standard and poverty of population of Russia and its regions: methods of estimation and analysis. Final report on EERC project. Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population Russian Academy of Science.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Drobyshevskaya T.A., Rozinskaya N.A. Subjective inequality perception: stages, methodology, contemporary research objectives. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2022;(4):209-228. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/013001052022411

Views: 357


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0130-0105 (Print)