LIBERALIZATION OF RELATIONS IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION HEAT SUPPLY FIELD: BACKGROUND, FIRST RESULTS AND TARIFF CONSEQUENCES

The paper considers prerequisites and consequences analysis of the relations in the heat supply field liberalization process of taking place in the Russian Federation. The article is dedicated to theoretical and practical background for liberalization, which determine the possibility and feasibility of a radical change in the system of relations between participants in the heat energy markets. The authors considered the current forms of using competition mechanisms in heat markets: competition between centralized and decentralized heat supply, competition between heat producers, competition for admission to market entry, quasi-competition based on incentive regulation. The article examines Russian instruments for liberalizing heat energy markets. The authors identified the features of the new (target) model of the heat energy market formation and changes in the spheres of responsibility of its individual subjects, including the strengthening of the institution of unified heat supply organizations. Separately, the authors assessed the price (tariff) consequences of the transition to pricing for thermal energy using the “no more expensive than alternative sources of heat” method. This method provides for setting a contractual price for heat energy not higher than a ceiling level that the regulator approves based on the cost of heat supply from an “alternative” heat source (boiler house). The authors investigated changes in prices (tariffs) for heat energy for consumers in municipalities pioneering the transition to price zones of heat supply. The article reveals that the establishment of a tariff by the "alternative boiler house" method did not effect to a sharp rise in prices (tariffs) for consumers. This is based on the application of measures provided for by legislation. In conclusion, the authors made recommendations on further expanding the composition of price zones for heat supply.

1. Bogachkova, L. Yu. (2007). Improving the management of Russian energy industries: theoretical background, practice, modeling. Volgograd State University.

2. Bukharov, S. V. (2019). Alternative Boiler as a Mechanism for Solving Existing Problems of Heat Supply. ECO Journal, 49(3), 57–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2019-3-57-65.

3. Gasho, E. G., Puzakov, V. S., & Stepanov, M. V. (2015). Reserves and priorities of heat and power supply of Russian cities in modern conditions. ECFOR.

4. Gimadi, V. I. (2014). The reform that warms: what is expected from the transformations in heat supply. Journal of Modern Competition, 4(46), 49–64.

5. National PPP Center. (11.12.2019). PPP in infrastructure and utilities. Analytical review. Retrieved October 1, 2021, from https://pppcenter.ru/upload/iblock/69c/69c99eeb8cb86ed3598d116a943d8c5c.pdf.

6. Dyomina, O. V. (2016). Heat energy markets: Spatial organization trends. Spatial Economics, 4, 33–60. https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2016.4.033-060.

7. Dyomina, O. V. (2017). The district heating regulation in Russia: Local markets’ reaction. Spatial Economics, 3, 62 — 82. https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2017.3.062-082.

8. Dyomina, O. V. (2018). Evolution of Approaches to Heat Energy Market Regulation. The Journal of Economic Theory, 15 (3), 496–506. https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2018.15-3.15.

9. Zyabkin, A. S. (2011). The heat energy market and its specifi city in the classical and modern concepts of the market relations. Business. Education. Law. Volgograd Business Institute, 3(16), 131–136.

10. Lisin, E. M. (2018). Methodological aspects of ensuring energy security at the territorial level in the conditions of liberalization and globalization of energy: monograph. MPEI.

11. Manevich, Yu. V. (2020). Alternative boiler station — a new form for investments in heat supply. Energy policy, 5, 52–61.

12. Matiyashchuk, S. V. (2010). The emergence and development of the thermal energy market in Russia. Federalism, 3, 99–106.

13. Nekrasov, A. S., Sinyak, Yu.V., & Voronina, S. A. (2011). The current state and prospects for the development of heat supply in Russia (eds.). Prospects for the development of heat supply in Russia. 2 (125), 37–54. ECFOR.

14. Pimenidi, K. (2014). «Alternative boiler room» — the only or alternative option? Energy and law, 3, 13–17.

15. Repetyuk, S. V., Mozgovaya, O. O., & Fayn, B. I. (2016). Distribution Electricity Network Connection Activities: Practice of Regulation in Russian Federation and Other Countries. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, 1, 61–78. https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2016-1-05

16. Stennikov, V. A., & Penkovskii, A. V. (2019). Problems of the Russian Heat Supply and Ways of Solvung them. ECO Journal, 49 (9), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.30680/ЕСО0131-7652-2019-9-48-69

17. FAS of Russia (n.d.). Materials on the dynamics of achievement of competition development indicators by regions as of July 2, 2021. Retrieved September 30, 2021, from https://fas.gov.ru/documents/687827

18. Demsetz, H. (1968). Why Regulate Utilities? Journal of Law and Economics, 55–65.

19. Li, H., Sun, Q., & Zhang, Qi et al. (2015). A review of the pricing mechanisms for district heating systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 55–56.

20. Lukosevicius, V., & Werring, L. (2011). Regulatory Implication of district heating. Retrieved September 30, 2021, from http://www.inogate.org/documents/DH%20regulation_textbook_FINAL_eng.pdf.

21. Söderholm, P., & Warell, L. (2011). Market opening and third party access in district heating networks. Energy Policy, 39 (2), 742–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.048