Some approaches to assessing the state of human capital (evidence from Kazakhstan)
https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202143
Abstract
The efficiency of economic development in the context of globalization and international integration is largely determined by the human capital accumulated and realized in the country. Modern science-intensive technologies require highly skilled specialists, engineers, and workers of technical professions. This becomes possible when using human capital of a new qualitative level, which makes it necessary to solve a number of methodological problems in terms of qualitative changes in the process of its formation. The aim of the study is to analyze the main approaches to the assessment of human capital and to develop proposals for its most objective assessment at various levels of manifestation — individual, micro- and macroeconomic. The article discusses the main methods for evaluating human capital: retrospective (based on the costs of its production) and perspective (based on income derived from the use of this capital). The proposed indicators of the qualitative state of human capital are aimed at its assessment from a new perspective, taking into consideration current global trends in the formation of innovative economy and digitalization.
About the Authors
A. K. Koshanov
Institute of Economics of the CS of MES of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Almaty.
Z. K. Chulanova
Institute of Economics of the CS of MES of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Almaty.
References
1. Andreeva, L., & Dzhemaev, O. (2017). The influence of the digital economy on the formation of new trends in the Russian labor market. State and Municipal Administration, 3, 25-31.
2. Bondarenko, G. (2005). Human capital: the main factors of its reproduction. Rostov on Don: Terra.
3. Chernotalova, E. (2014). Methodological approaches to assessing the value of a firm's human capital. Bulletin of KrasGAU, 7, 22-29.
4. Chulanova, Z. (2017). "Smart community" as a new paradigm for managing socio-economic development. Problems of economic growth and sustainable development of territories (pp. 319-323). Vologda Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
5. Chulanova, Z. K. (2017). Effective model of social and labor relations: approaches to regulation. International Conference on Business and Economics (ICBE 2017) (pp. 103104). KODISA.
6. Chulanova, Z. K. (2019). Regulating Kazakhstan's Labor Relations under New Socioeconomic Conditions. E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies, 8(3), 47 - 67.
7. Coleman, J. (2001). Social and human capital. Social Sciences and Modernity, 3, 124-128. Committee on Statistics of the Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2020). Official statistical information. http://stat.gov.kz/faces/homePage;jsessionid
8. Dyatlov, S. (2007). Foundations of the theory of human capital. SPb.: Publishing house SPUEF.
9. House of the Higher School of Economics.
10. Influence. Problems of the development of an innovative and creative economy. http:// bgscience.ru/lib/10847
11. Information and legal system of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2017). State program “Digital Information and legal system of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2018). On approval of the Strategic Development Plan of the Republic of Kazakhstan until 2025. Decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated February 15, 2018 No. 636. http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/U1800000636
12. Kapelyushnikov, R. (2012). How much is Russia's human capital worth? Moscow: Ed. house of the Higher School of Economics.
13. Kasaeva, T., & Bondarskaya, T. (2014). Creative human capital as a driving force of the modern economy. Bulletin of the Tambov University. Series: Humanities, 2 (130), 51-56.
14. Kolos, E. (2016). The genesis of the formation of the country's knowledge economy based on the development of human capital. Site of the East Kazakhstan State Technical University. http://www.journal.asu.ru/index.php/c/article/download/125
15. Kotyrlo, E. S. (2011). Human potential and human capital as scientific categories. Audit and financial analysis, 6, 1-7.
16. Kurganskiy S. (2011). The structure of human capital and its assessment at the macro level. Izvestia IGEA, 6 (80), 16-23.
17. Modern economy. Bulletin of the Tambov University. Series: Humanities, 2 (130), 51-56.
18. Narkulov, M. S. (2010). Estimation of cost of the human capital of Kazakhstan on a method of the cumulative labor income during all life. Human Capital Lead. www.hclead.kz
19. Novolodskaya, G. I. (2002). Competitiveness of human capital. Prospects for Russian reforms in conditions of macroeconomic instability: International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 223-228). Irkutsk: IGEA.
20. Pereverzeva, A. V. (2011). Human potential and human capital: interconnection and mutual influence. Problems of the development of an innovative and creative economy. http://bgscience.ru/lib/10847
21. Shishkov, Y. (2002). Demographic perspectives of the world community. Reflections on the future. Moscow: Global World.
Review
For citations:
Koshanov A.K., Chulanova Z.K. Some approaches to assessing the state of human capital (evidence from Kazakhstan). Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2021;(4):49-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202143
Views:
448
Email this article 