Can political economy be non-Marxist? Relevance of applied political economy

Initially political economy was non-Marxist but under the influence of ideology it has become Marxist; with rejection of official ideology of Marxism, it can and should again become non-Marxist. Marxism is an ideology/ policy that proclaims the inevitable death of capitalism and its replacement with socialism. Ideology forced political economy to abandon the subject —
«the wealth of nations» (Smith) which was transformed into «social relations developing in the process of production, distribution, exchange and consumption of material goods, and economic laws governing their development in socio-economic formations historically replacing each other». Marxian economics was identified with the ideology of Marxism. The three constituent parts of Marxism have lost their relevance. The materialistic foundation of Marxism rested on three discoveries (the cell, energy conservation, and Darwinism). A new social organism was believed to have been born from a cell that existed in an old organism; the birth of a new one means the death of the old one. The history of all societies was represented by the history of the struggle between the exploiting and exploited classes, the result of which was a progressive change of formations. The discoveries of the XIX century were either refuted by modern natural science (cell theory), or significantly modernized (synthetic theory of evolution). The theory of class exploitation as a deduction from the product of labor was refuted by Marx. Rejection of Marxism does not mean rejection of the materialist understanding of history, but an understanding based on modern materialism. The subject of political economy in broad sense is various modes of life reproduction (analogue of a species) and their modification (population). The history of all previous societies was the history of struggle, not classes, but of modes of production of life. The subject of the non-Marxist political economy of capitalism is the relationship of the reproduction of the life of three large classes (capitalists, hired workers, landowners). The method is an analogue of the method for constructing genomes of biological species. Non-Marxist political economy and economics have a common subject and form two components of a new academic discipline «applied political economy», in which the descriptive method of economics is complemented by an explicative one.

1. Auzan, A. (2018). Glavnoe – ne doigrat’sya do real’noj mirovoj vojny. Tekstovaya versiya otkrytogo interv’yu dekana Ekonomicheskogo fakul’teta MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova Aleksandra Auzana, proshedshego v ramkah cikla besed «S evropejskoj tochki zreniya». https://snob.ru/entry/168500/.

2. Auzan, A. A., Bahtigaraeva, A. I., & Bryzgalin, V. A., Zolotov, A. V., Nikishina, E. N., Pripuzova, N. A., Stavinskaya, A. A. (2020). Sociokul’turnye faktory v ekonomike: projdennye rubezhi i aktual’naya povestka. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2, 75—91.

3. Auzan, A. A., Nikishina E. N. (2021). Sociokul’turnaya ekonomika: kak kul’tura vliyaet na ekonomiku, a ekonomika — na kul’turu: kurs lekcij. Ekonomicheskij fakul’tet MGU imeni M. V. Lomonosova.

4. Blaug, M. (1994). Ekonomicheskaya mysl’ v retrospektive. Delo Ltd.

5. Bol’shaya sovetskaya enciklopediya. (1969–1978). https://bse.slovaronline.com/

6. Buzgalin, A. V., Kolganov, A. I. (2016). [Post]klassicheskaya politicheskaya ekonomiya: potencial resheniya problem social’no-ekonomicheskoj politiki. Voprosy politicheskoj ekonomii, 2

7. Buzgalin, A. V., Kolganov, A. I. (2019). Global’nyj kapital: Metodologiya: Po tu storonu pozitivizma, postmodernizma i ekonomicheskogo imperializma (Marks re-loaded) T. 1. 5-e izd., dop. URSS.

8. Buzgalin, A. V., Kolganov, A. I. (2019). Global’nyj kapital: Teoriya: Global’naya gegemoniya kapitala i ee predely. («Kapital» re-loaded) T.2. Izd. 5-e, dop. URSS.

9. Buzgalin, A. V., Kolganov, A. I., & Barashkova, O. V. (2020). Klassicheskaya politicheskaya ekonomiya: Sovremennoe marksistskoe napravlenie. Bazovyj uroven’. Prodvinutyj uroven’ 3-e izd. Izdatel’stvo Lenand.

10. Cagolov, N. A. (red.) (1973). Kurs politicheskoj ekonomii. V 2-h t. T. I. Ucheb. posobie dlya ekon. vuzov i fak. Izd. 3-e. Izdatel’stvo “Ekonomika”.

11. Chencov, Yu. S. (2004). Vvedenie v kletochnuyu biologiyu: Uchebnik dlya vuzov. — 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. IKC «Akademkniga».

12. Engel’s, F. (1959). Karl Marks. «K kritike politicheskoj ekonomii». Marks K., Engel’s F. Soch. 2-e izd. T. 13. Politizdat.

13. Engel’s, F. (1961). Predislovie k nem. izd. «Manifesta kommunisticheskoj partii». Marks K., Engel’s F. Soch. 2-e izd. T. 21. Politizdat.

14. Engel’s, F. (1964). Lyudvig Fejerbah i konec klassicheskoj nemeckoj filosofii. Marks K., Engel’s F. Soch. 2-e izd. T. 21.

15. Fridmen, M. (1999). Marshallianskaya krivaya sprosa. Vekhi ekonomicheskoj mysli. Teoriya potrebitel’skogo povedeniya i sprosa. T. 1.

16. Gref, G. (2009). Predislovie k rossijskomu izdaniyu. Krugman P. Vozvrashchenie Velikoj depressii? Mirovoj krizis glazami nobelevskogo laureate. Eksmo.

17. Istoriya Vsesoyuznoj Kommunisticheskoj Partii (bol’shevikov). Kratkij kurs (1938). Izdatel’stvo CK VKP(b) Pravda.

18. Kapelyushnikov, R. I. (2021). Marzhinalizm i marksizm: pervaya vstrecha. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2, 102–132.

19. Lenin, V. I. (1969). Karl Marks Polnoe sobranie sochinenij. T. 26. Izdatel’stvo politicheskoj literatury.

20. Lenin, V. I. (1973). Tri istochnika i tri sostavnyh chasti marksizma. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij. T. 23. — M.: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoj literatury, 1973.

21. Marks, K. (1959). K kritike politicheskoj ekonomii. Predislovie. Marks K., Engel’s F. Soch. 2-e izd. T. 13. Politizdat.

22. Marks, K. (1960). Kapital. Kritika politicheskoj ekonomii. T. I. Marks K., Engel’s F. Soch. 2-e izd. T. 23. Politizdat.

23. Marks, K. (1961). Kapital. Kritika politicheskoj ekonomii. T. III. Marks K., Engel’s F. Soch. 2-e izd. T. 25. CH. I. Politizdat.

24. Marks, K. (1962). Kapital. Kritika politicheskoj ekonomii. T. III. Marks K., Engel’s F. Soch. 2-e izd. T. 25. CH. 2. Politizdat.

25. Marks, K. (1974). [Fragmenty iz avtorizovannogo francuzskogo izdaniya I toma «Kapitala»]. Marks K., Engel’s F. Soch. 2-e izd. T. 49. Politizdat.

26. Marks, K., Engel’s, F. (1955). Manifest kommunisticheskoj partii. Marks K., Engel’s F. Soch. 2-e izd. T. 4. Politizdat.

27. Porohovskij, A. A. (2016). Politicheskaya ekonomiya v XXI veke: sistemnyj podhod v reshenii sovremennoj ekonomiki. Voprosy politicheskoj ekonomii. 4

28. Porohovskij, A. A. (red.) (2010). Obshchaya ekonomicheskaya teoriya. Vvodnyj kurs. V 3-h kn Izdatel’skij dom «Kodeks».

29. Rajnert, E. S. (2011). Kak bogatye strany stali bogatymi, i pochemu bednye strany ostayutsya bednymi. Izd. dom Gos. un-ta — Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki.

30. Ryazanov, V. T. (2017). «Kapital» K.Marksa i sovremennyj kapitalizm: vozmozhnosti i preimushchestva politekonomii postmarksistskogo sinteza. Voprosy politicheskoj ekonomii, 4, 10–29.

31. Smit, A. (2007). Issledovanie o prirode i prichinah bogatstva narodov. Eksmo.

32. Sorokin, A. V. (2009). Teoriya obshchestvennogo bogatstva. Osnovaniya mikroi makroekonomiki: Uchebnik. Izdatel’stvo «Ekonomika».

33. Sorokin, A. V. (2016). Obshchaya ekonomika: bakalavriat, magistratura, aspirantura. Direkt-Media.

34. Sorokin, A. V. (2020). «Ekonomicheskaya kletochka» ili «molekula DNK»?: soglasovanie «Kapitala» Marksa s kletochnoj teoriej i sovremennoj genetikoj. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Ekonomika, 6, 23–45.

35. Sorokin, A. V. (2020). Obshchaya ekonomika: bakalavriat. Kratkij kurs: uchebnik. DirektMedia.

36. Sorokin, A. V. (2021). Teoriya obshchestvennogo bogatstva. Kategorii modeli: Uchebnoe posobie. 8-e izd., dopolnennoe. «MAKS Press».