Foreign experience in organizing state and business relationship and its impact on urbanization

The subject of this study is the relationship between state and municipal authorities, representatives of business sector, the population of certain territories in terms of the need for physical interaction between government and business, which ultimately affects the location of the population. The goal is to prove that Russia’s big business itself strives to be physically closer to the authorities, which does not have a positive effect on the processes of urbanization. In its turn, foreign experience demonstrates more effective options for the relationship between state and business that do not affect other social processes. In this work, the author uses statistical method, the method of modeling in terms of formulating the author's proposals, expert assessments, comparative legal method, as well as general scientific methods of deduction, induction, analysis and synthesis. The work shows close relationship between business and public authorities in the Russian Federation, which is due to the territorial location of a large number of people in the area where there are conditions for such interaction. The described situation is not characteristic of most foreign countries. Some variants of influence for overcoming the specified problem are offered. Scope of the results: public administration system, including the processes of state influence on economic entities. Also, individual proposals can be applied in urban planning, solving issues of demography and urbanization. Russia is characterized by a very close relationship between state power and the commercial sector, which significantly distinguishes it from most of other countries, at least in terms of territorial structure. This situation has a negative impact on a large number of social institutions, and therefore it is necessary to take a number of organizational measures, including the use of administration of planning and urban planning activities based on foreign experience.

1. Abakumova, E. B. (2018). Practical aspects of the functioning of the institute of authorized persons for the protection of the rights of entrepreneurs in the Russian Federation. Law and Economics, 6, 11–16; 7, 9–16.

2. Alyabyeva, E. M. (2020). Economic mechanism for supporting science and education in the region: a theoretical aspect. School of University Science: a development paradigm, 1(35), 16–18.

3. Arkhiereev, N. V. (2019). Public Procurement and Arbitration Courts. Journal of Entrepreneurial and Corporate Law, 4, 14–17.

4. Balashova, I. N. (2021). Arbitration agreement: legal nature and practice of application of the arbitration agreement. Arbitration and civil process, 4, 32–36. http://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383X-2021-4-32-36

5. Dedkov, A. G. (2020). Problems of territorial planning of cities (on the example of Moscow). Innovations and investments, 5, 217–220.

6. Garanin, M. Yu. (2014). Interaction of a lawyer with the institution of commissioners for the protection of the rights of entrepreneurs in the defense of criminal cases initiated against business entities: a practical guide. Ed. salon IP Gladkov O. V.

7. Khudyakov, A. V. (2016). Law enforcement activities of the police to ensure economic security (Russian and foreign experience). Actual problems of managing the infrastructure of internal affairs bodies and ensuring economic security, 264–268.

8. Kvashnin, Yu. (2020). European cities as actors of migration policy. Modern Europe, 7, 101–112. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope72020101112

9. Li, N. O., & Kibitkin, A. I. (2020). On the spatial development of the economy of regions of Russia. Issues of innovative economics, 10 (2), 747–756. http://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.10.2.100913

10. Lukashin, Yu. P., & Rakhlina, L. I. (2019). Innovative clusters abroad and in Russia. Vestnik MIRBIS, 2 (18), 142–153. http://doi.org/10.25634/MIRBIS.2019.2.19

11. Mitskevich, L. A. (2011). Infl uence of new management procedures on the development of the science of administrative law. Law and process in the 21st century: continental experience and prospects, 97–106.

12. Ochkurenko, S. V. (2021). The place of absolute civil rights in the system of legal regulation of merchant shipping relations. Lex russica (Russian law), 1 (170), 18–31. http:// doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2021.170.1.018-031

13. Pogrebskaya, S. A. (2018). Problems of reducing the administrative burden on business: the experience of interaction between the system of chambers of commerce and industry of the Moscow region and control and supervisory authorities. Journal of Entrepreneurial and Corporate Law, 2, 28–31.

14. Pryadko, I. P. (2017). The development of small Russian cities in the XIX–XXI centuries. Economy and entrepreneurship, 8-3 (85), 561–566.

15. Rastorguev, S. V. (2013). Power and business in modern Russia. ROSSPEN.

16. Vershinina, I. A., & Kurbanov, A. R. (2020). Brasilia: a realized utopia, but not a dream come true? Latin America, 4, 86–96. http://doi.org/10.31857/S0044748X0008710-0

17. Zidentop, L. (2004). Democracy in Europe. Logos.