The correlation between deferred taxes, tax accruals and cash fl ows of Russian companies

This paper confirms the informational value of deferred taxes for assessing tax accruals and their corresponding cash flows. Currently, many experts point out that recording tax effects distorts the perception of financial reality and does not lead to optimal business decisions, and modern research denies the connection of balance sheet deferred taxes with future cash flows at all. The above aspects are considered and tested for Russian organizations for the period of 2012–2018 using standard econometric analysis techniques. The inclusion of deferred tax factors leads to significant volatility in both tax accruals and tax cash flows, depending on which net deferred tax position is held by the economic entity. The findings show that with active positions, national organizations accrue almost 7.8–10.0% more and at the same time pay 8.1–8.7% less tax to the budget relative to other situations. Based on the confirmed hypotheses, the study develops a conceptual scheme to link tax accruals with deferred tax positions, which allows us to analyze the current corporate tax behavior of a company and its potential tax opportunities. The results show that the change in tax accruals in the structure of financial profit before tax on average increase tax cash flows 1.28–1.41 times, while tax accruals increase 0.46–0.54 times with a 1% increase in tax cash flows. The statistical significance of dividend (income payments to business owners) and investment policy (acquisition of non-current assets) factors for the evaluation of tax accruals and cash flows is also established. The findings provide a wide range of tools for further research in profit stability analysis, bankruptcy signs, and solvency of Russian organizations.

1. Acheampong D., Valencia A., Volkan A. (2013). Industry specific impact of simplifying deferred taxes. Journal of Finance and Accountancy, 13. Available at: https://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/131485.pdf (accessed: 22.02.2022)

2. Aksent’ev А.А. (2021). Concepts of deferred tax accounting and their relation to accounting ideologies. Accounting. Analysis. Audit, 8(4), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2021-8-4-34-50

3. Ayers B., Laplante S.K., McGuire S.T. (2008). Credit Ratings and Taxes: The Effect of Book/Tax Differences on Ratings Changes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(2), 359–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01011.x

4. Bas M.B., Indrijawati P. (2020). The effect of book-tax differences, cash flow volatility, and corporate governance on earning quality. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 5(11), 367–376.

5. Bauman C.C., Bauman M.P., Halsey R.F. (2001). Do Firms Use the Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance to Manage Earnings? Journal of the American Taxation Association, 23(1), 27–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.239054

6. Black H.A. (1966). Interperiod allocation of corporate income taxes; Accounting research study no. 09. New York, AICPA, 123 p. Available at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1154&context=aicpa_guides (accessed: 22.02.2022)

7. Blaylock B., Shevlin T., Wilson R.J. (2012). Tax Avoidance, Large Positive Temporary Book-Tax Differences, and Earnings Persistence. The Accounting Review, 87(1), 91–120. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10158

8. Brouwer A., Naarding E. (2018). Making deferred taxes relevant. Accounting in Europe, 15(2), 200–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2018.1451903

9. Chludek A.K. (2011). On the Relation of Deferred Taxes and Tax Cash Flow (Working Paper). University of Cologne. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1778265 (accessed: 22.02.2022)

10. Christensen T.E., Paik G.H., Stice E.K. (2008). Creating a Bigger Bath Using the Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35(5-6), 601–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2008.02092.x

11. Colley R., Rue J., Volkan A. (2010). Deferred Taxes in the Context of the Unit Problem. Journal of Finance and Accountancy, 2. Available at: https://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/09231.pdf (accessed: 22.02.2022)

12. Colley R., Rue J., Volkan A. (2004). Deferred Taxes Revisited. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 2(8), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v2i8.2907

13. Edwards A. (2018). The deferred tax asset valuation allowance and firm creditworthiness. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 40(1), 57–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2968463

14. Foster B.P., Ward T.J. (2007). The incremental usefulness of income tax allocations in predicting one-year-ahead future cash flows. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 23(4), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v23i4.1378

15. Gallemore J. (2012). Deferred Tax Assets and Bank Regulatory Capital. Working Paper, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Available at: https://www.fdic.gov/analysis/cfr/bank-research-conference/annual-12th/gallemore.pdf (accessed: 22.02.2022)

16. Geyer E.S. (2014). Problems of deferred taxes representation in accounting. Actual problems of economics, 4, 438–445.

17. Guia L.D., Dantas J.A. (2020). Value relevance of deferred tax assets in the Brazilian banking industry. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 31(82), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201808060

18. Hanlon M. (2005). The Persistence and Pricing of Earnings, Accruals, and Cash Flows When Firms Have Large Book-Tax Differences. The Accounting Review, 80(1), 137–166. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.379140

19. Karjalainen J., Kasanen E., Kinnunen J., Niskanen J. (2020). Dividends and tax avoidance as drivers of earnings management: Evidence from dividend-paying private SMEs in Finland. Journal of Small Business Management. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3739370 (accessed: 22.02.2022)

20. Kyriazopoulos G., Makriyiannis G., Logotheti M.-R. (2019). The Impact of Deferred Taxation on Banking Profitability and Capital Adequacy. Evidence from the Greek Banking System. International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.33094/8.2017.2019.51.1.13

21. Ladi O.M., Adediran S.A., Ude A.O. (2020). Book tax differences (BTDs) and financial distress of listed consumer goods firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Advanced Finance and Accounting, 1(2), 31–51. Available at: https://airjournal.org/ijafa/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2021/03/31-51.pdf (accessed: 22.02.2022)

22. Moore J.A., Xu L. (2018). Book-tax differences and costs of private debt. Advances in Accounting, 42, 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2018.07.001

23. Noga T. (2013). Book-Tax Differences as an Indicator of Financial Distress. Accounting Horizons, 27(3), 469–489. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2159922

24. Persada A.E., Martani D. (2010). Analysis of the factors that affect the book tax gap and its influence on the persistence of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Finance Indonesia, 7(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2010.12

25. Phillips J., Pincus M., Rego S.O., Wan H. (2004). Decomposing Changes in Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities to Isolate Earnings Management Activities. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 26, 43–66. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.452980

26. Poterba J.M., Rao N.S., Seidman J.K. (2011). Deferred tax positions and incentives for corporate behavior around corporate tax changes. National Tax Journal, 64(1), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2011.1.02

27. Rathke A.A.T., Rezende A.J., Antônio R.M., Moraes M.B.C. (2019). Last chance for a big bath: managing deferred taxes under IAS 12 in Brazilian listed firms. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 30(80), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201806340

28. Silva J.M., Souto N., Pereira J.A. (2021). Closed form solution for the valuation of deferred tax assets. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5897/JAT2020.0429

29. Skinner D.J. (2008). The rise of deferred tax assets in Japan: The role of deferred tax accounting in the Japanese banking crisis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(2-3), 218–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.07.003