Preview

Moscow University Economics Bulletin

Advanced search

Export, domestic sales and import: interconnection in the exporting market

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-3-13

Abstract

The paper develops a model of partial equilibrium of an export-oriented market, which includes three markets for a differentiated product: the domestic markets of a selected exporting country and a global exporter (a set of other exporting countries that supply to the external sales market of the exporting country), as well as the external, the combined market of importing countries, which considers the competition between the exporting country and the global exporter. At the same time, it was assumed that imports in exporting countries are small and can be excluded from consideration. The new statement takes into account the supply of imports to the domestic market of the exporting country. In a state close to equilibrium, the model ensures the fulfillment of the following relationships: 1) the external supplies of the exporting country are positively related to their own production. For the dependence of the external supplies of the exporting country on the output volumes of the global exporter, the conditions under which it has a negative or positive relationship are specified. In general, the nature of this relationship depends on the size of the exporting country's market, and in most cases this relationship is negative; 2) the import of the exporting country positively depends on the output of the global exporter, solutions have been found in which the dependence on the output of the exporting country can be both negative and positive; 3) the price of the domestic market of the exporting country is negatively related to the output of the global exporter, its relationship with the production of the exporting country in most cases is negative. Based on the model, the impact of supply and demand shocks on the export-oriented market is analyzed. The scenario associated with the fall in global barley production is considered, which, in general, confirmed the adequacy of the model. The theoretical significance of the study lies in substantiating the nature of the relationships that arise in the sales markets of the exporting country, in particular, depending on the size of the exporter's sales market. The practical relevance of the model lies in its great scientific potential for solving problems related to assessing the impact of supply and demand shocks on the domestic market, with the development of measures to stabilize it.

About the Author

K. G. Borodin
All-Russian Institute of Agrarian Problems and Informatics named after A. A. Nikonov
Russian Federation

Moscow



References

1. Arguments and Facts. (2022, August 12). Export substitution. With whom will Russia trade instead of the West? Retrieved September 16, 2020, from https://aif.ru/money/economy/eksportozameshchenie_s_kem_rossiya_budet_torgovat_vmesto_zapada

2. Borodin, К. (2021). Impact of exports on the exporter's domestic market. Economic science of modern Russia, 4, 49–67. https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2021-4(95)-49-67

3. Interfax. (2022, April 18). The unpredictable logistics of an era of change. Review. Retrieved September 16, 2020, from https://www.interfax.ru/business/835549

4. Weather news. (2020, January 9). 2019 is a record hot and dry year in Australia. Retrieved September 16, 2020, from https://www.meteovesti.ru/news/63714259572-2019-god-rekordno-zharkij-suhoj-avstralii

5. ТАSS. (2022, September 14). The Cabinet of Ministers will support the reorientation of exports to the markets of friendly countries. Retrieved September 16, 2020, from https://tass.ru/ekonomika/15748465

6. Breinlich, H., Leromain, E., Novy, D., & Sampson, T. (2021) Import Liberalization as Export Destruction? Evidence from the United States. Retrieved September 16, 2022 from https://personal.lse.ac.uk/sampsont/ExportDestruction.pdf

7. Buffie, E. (1995). Import Liberalization vs. Export Promotion. Canadian Journal of Economics, 2(3), 603–616. 8 8

8. Campos, С., & Menezes-Filho, I. (2019). Imports and the Survival of New Exporters. Insper Working Paper WPE: 386.

9. Dixit, A. K. (1979). A Model of Duopoly Suggesting a Theory of Entry Barriers. Bell Joumal of Economics, 10(1), 20–32.

10. E-malt.com. (2020, Oktober 26). Canada: 2019/20 barley exports decrease to 3 mln tonnes. Retrieved September 16, 2022 from: http://www.e-malt.com/new/News.asp?Command=ArticleShow&ArticleID=38480

11. Esteves, P. S., & Rua, A. (2015). Is there a role for domestic demand pressure on export performance? Empirical Economics, 49(4), 1173–1189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-014-0908-5

12. Fan H., Li A., Yeaple S. (2014) Trade liberalization, quality, and export prices. NBER Working Paper 20323.

13. Halpern, L., Koren, M., & Szeidl, A. (2015). Imported inputs and productivity. The American Economic Review, 105(12), 3660–3703. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150443

14. International Trade Centre (n.d.). Trade Statistics. Retrieved September 16, 2022, from https://intracen.org/resources/trade-statistics#export-of-goods

15. Investopedia (n.d.). Demand, Supply Shocks Definition. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/supplyshock.asp; https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/demandshock.asp

16. Kamin, S., Marazzi, M., & Schindler, J. (2006). The Impact of Chinese Exports on Global Import Prices. Review of International Economics, 14(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2006.00569.x

17. Krugman, P. (1984). Import protection and export promotion: international competition in the presence of oligopoly and economies of scale. In: Kierzkowski, H. (Ed.). Monopolistic Competition and International Trade. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 180–193.

18. Krugman, P. (1980). Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade. American Economic Review, 70(5), 950–959.

19. Mankiw, N. G. (2018). Macroeconomics. 10-th edition. N. Y. : McMillan International.

20. Melitz, M. (2003). The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725. DOI:10.1111/1468-0262.00467

21. Ratnaike Y. (2012) Is there an empirical link between trade liberalisation and export performance? Economics Letters, 117(1), 375–78.

22. Santos-Paulino A., Thirlwall A. (2004) The Impact of Trade Liberalisation on Exports, Imports and the Balance of Payments of Developing Countries. Economic Journal, 114(493), 50-72, February.

23. Singh, N., & Vives, X. (1984). Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. Rand Journal of Economics, 15(4), 546–554.

24. USDA. (2020). EU Barley Exports Start Strong. Grain: World Markets and Trade March. Retrieved September 16, 2022 from https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/zs25x844t/j3860r71x/7h14b7488/grain.pdf


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Borodin K.G. Export, domestic sales and import: interconnection in the exporting market. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2023;(3):261-286. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-3-13

Views: 375


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0130-0105 (Print)