Preview

Moscow University Economics Bulletin

Advanced search

Reforms of Peter I as a variant of adaptive modernization

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-2-3

Abstract

The article considers the reforms of Peter I from the standpoint of historical sociology and institutional economic theory with the aim to identify the features of Peter's modernization and its role in forming Russia’s path dependence, and this purpose is realized by comparing it with Stalin's modernization. The study rests on the division of modernization into two types: adaptation and westernization models. This division constitutes the methodological basis of the study and allows further use of comparative analysis in reviewing Peter’s and Stalin’s modernization. Peter's reforms are viewed as adaptive modernization: the 17th century formal institutions of Muscovy were replaced by imported (Western) ones, but at the same time basic components of the political system and political culture were preserved. The reforms resulted in a fully state-driven society and developed economy. Totalitarianism in Russia first took shape in the early 18th century. It combined the archaic institutions of Muscovy newly introduced imported ones. The latter strengthened autocratic rule, power- property as an institutional foundation of Russia. At the same time, cultural and everyday westernization was built into Peter's reforms. It subsequently became the basis of in-depth westernization in the form of the release of the nobility from compulsory service. A comparative analysis of the Peter’s and Stalin’s modernization showed that they have both common features and differences. Total nationalization of life, focus on militarization, despotism unite them. However, while Peter's modernization transformed the archaic society, Stalin's one revived the archaic in the place of westernized society of the early 20th century

About the Author

A. P. Zaostrovtsev
HSE University; International Center for Social-Economic Studies “Leontiev Center”
Russian Federation

St. Petersburg



References

1. Akhiezer A., Klyamkin I., Yakovenko I. (2005). History of Russia: The End or a New Beginning? Moscow: Novoe izdanie.

2. Voloshin M. (2022). Russia. https://www.culture.ru/poems/33403/rossiya.

3. Giddens A., Sutton Ph.W. (2021). Essential Concepts in Sociology. 3rd ed. Moscow: NRU HSE.

4. Zaostrovtsev A.P. (2020). Modernization Debate: Common Road or Special Ways? SPb: European University in St.Petersburg.

5. Zaostrovtsev A.P. (2020). Serving State” in Post-Soviet Russia: II Reincarnation of the Matrix of Muscovy. In A.P. Zaostrovtsev (ed.). Russia 1917-2017: European modernization or a special path? SPb: MTsSEI “Leontiev Center” (pp. 46-68).

6. Anisimov E.V. (1989). Time of Peter's reforms. L.: Lenizdat.

7. Anisimov E.V. (2016). Imperial Russia. SPb.: Piter.

8. Anisimov E.V. (2009). History of Russia from Rurik to Putin. People. Developments. Dates. SPb.: Piter.

9. Kirin A.V. (2022). State reforms in Russia: from Peter to Putin. 2nd ed. Moscow: NRU HSE.

10. Kotsyubinskii D.A. (2019). The Civilization of Resentment. Institutional and Historical Analysis of Russian Political Culture. In A.P. Zaostrovtsev (ed.). Institutional Economics: History, Problems and Prospects. SPb: MTsSEI “Leontiev Center” (pp. 109-151).

11. Collins R. (2015). Macrohistory. Essays in Sociology of the Long Run. Moscow: URSS; LENAND.

12. Oleinik A.N. (2022). Russian Economic Discourse in 1989-2020 through the Prism of Big Data Discourse. Finance and Business, 1, 85-96.

13. Travin D., Marganiya O. (2004). European Modernization. V.1. Moscow: “AST”, SPb.: Terra Fantastica.

14. Travin D.Ya. (2022). How the State Gets Rich: A Guide to Historical Sociology. Moscow: Gaidar Institute.

15. Travin D.Ya. (2019). Steep Hills of the XXI Century: Post-modernization and Problems of Russia. SPb: European University in St.Petersburg.

16. Lindsey B. (2006). Against the Dead Hand. The Uncertain Struggle for Global Capitalism. Moscow: Alpina Business Book.

17. Marx K. (1968). Economic Manuscripts 1857-1859. Marx K., Engels F. Sobr. Soch. V. 46, part I. Moscow: Gospolitizdat.

18. Sakwa R. (2011). Communism in Russia. An Interpretative Essay. Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia (ROSSPEN).

19. Pipes R. (2001). Property and Freedom. Moscow: Moscow School of Political Researches.

20. Ferguson N. (2014). Civilization. The West and the Rest. Moscow: AST: CORPUS.

21. Hedlund S. (2015). Invisible Hands, Russian Experience, and Social Science: Approaches to Understanding Systemic Failure. Moscow: NRU HSE.

22. Yanov A.L. (2017). The Dispute about the "Eternal" Autocracy: From Grozny to Putin. Moscow: New Chronograph.

23. Yanov A.L. (2015). Russian idea. From Nicholas I to Putin. Book One (1825-1917). Moscow: New Chronograph.

24. Yanov A.L. (2007). Russia and Europe. In 3 books. Book second. Mysteries of Nikolaev Russia. 1825-1855. Moscow: New Chronograph.

25. Yanov A.L. (2009). Russia and Europe. In 3 books. Book third. The drama of patriotism in Russia. 1855-1921. Moscow: New Chronograph.


Supplementary files

1. Неозаглавлен
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
Download (13KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾

Review

For citations:


Zaostrovtsev A.P. Reforms of Peter I as a variant of adaptive modernization. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2023;(2):45-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-2-3

Views: 343


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0130-0105 (Print)