Network approach in social entrepreneurship: preliminary results of the empirical research

The purpose of this article is to illustrate the possibilities of using network approach in social entrepreneurship as one of the key tools for the sustainability of social enterprises. The authors first consider the approaches to determine the nature of social entrepreneurship in general, as well as the prerequisites for applying network approach in social entrepreneurship in particular. Such a preliminary theoretical review is important, since despite the popularity of the concept “social entrepreneurship”, at the same time we observe great uncertainty and fragmentation in the theory of social entrepreneurship, in matters of legislative regulation and state support in this area. Defining the essence of social entrepreneurship through the prism of institutional analysis is most relevant, since it is an approach that makes it possible to correlate the benefits and costs of a particular form of organization at a fundamental level, to cover the phenomenon at large, and not just individual manifestations of its features. The effectiveness of the application of the network approach in various forms of organizations has long been proven both in the new institutional economic theory and in various management concepts. The application of network approach in social entrepreneurship is also relevant. The article considers certain implications in applying this form of organization of economic interaction in the field of social entrepreneurship. The paper presents the results of an empirical study conducted in February-April 2022 among Russian entrepreneurs while preparing for the interregional expert session ≪Entrepreneurial networks as a factor in the sustainable development of the territory≫. The survey conducted by the method of questioning, including closed and open questions involved 115 people from 30 regions of Russia - owners and founders of small and medium-sized businesses. The paper concludes with presenting possible ways of applying the results of empirical research for the development of network forms of organization in social entrepreneurship.

1. Aray, Yu. N., & Burmistrova, T. A. (2014). Specifi city of business models in social entrepreneurship. Russian Journal of Management, 12 (4), 55–78.

2. Barinova, V. A. (2018). Foreign experience in the development of social entrepreneurship and the possibility of its application in Russia.M.: E. Gaidar Institute.

3. Blaug, M. (1994). Economic thought in retrospect. M: Business.

4. Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the fi rm. Economica, 4.

5. Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social costs. In: Firm, market and law. Per. from English. M.: New publishing house.

6. Katukov, D. D., Malygin, V. E., & Smorodinskaya, N. V. (2012) The institutional environment of the globalized economy: the development of network interactions / ed. N. V. Smorodinskaya. M.: IE RAN.

7. Kulkova, V. Yu. (2016). Social entrepreneurship, non-profi t organizations and corporate social responsibility in building intersectoral partnerships: a review of theoretical developments. Scientific Review, 7, 183–187.

8. Moskovskaya, A. A. (2011). Social entrepreneurship in Russia and in the world: practice and research. M.: Higher School of Economics.

9. Polishchuk, L. I. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility or State Regulation: An Analysis of Institutional Choice. Voprosy Economiki, 10, 4–22.

10. Sheresheva, M. Yu. (2008). Types of network intercompany interaction. Development of forms of interfirm cooperation: networks and relationships. M.: Higher School of Economics.

11. Stiglitz, J. (1997). Economics of the public sector. Translation from English.M.: INFRA.

12. Aldrich, H., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through Social Networks. The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship. Eds. D. L. Sexton, R. W. Smilor. N. Y.: Ballinger.

13. Amudha, R., & Banu, C. V. (2009). Micro Finance — A Tool for Elevation of Social Entrepreneurship through Women Empowerment. Asia-Pacific Business Review, V (1), 77–86.

14. Baierl, R. (2014). Antecedents of Social Entrepreneurial Intentions: The Role of an Individual's General Social Appraisal. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5 (2), 123–145.

15. Birley, S. (1985). The Role of Networks in the Entrepreneurial Process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1 (1), 107–117.

16. Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Stephan, U. (2013). Entrepreneurship, social capital, and institutions: Social and commercial entrepreneurship across nations. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 37, 479–504.

17. Gedajlovic, E., Honig, B., Moore, C. B., Payne, G. T., & Wright, M. (2013). Social Capital and Entrepreneurship: A Schema and Research Agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 37, 455–478.

18. Gerybadze, A. (1995). Strategic Alliance and Process eDesign. N. Y.: Walter de Gruyter Press.Giudici, А., Combs, J., Cannatelli, B., & Smith, B. (2018). Successful Scaling in Social Franchising: The Case of Impact Hub. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44 (2), 288–314.

19. Grimstad, S., & Burgess, J. (2014). Environmental sustainability and competitive advantage in a wine tourism micro-cluster. Management Research Review, 37 (6), 553–573.

20. Hermann, R. R., & Wigger, K. (2017). Eco-innovation drivers in value-creating networks: A case study of ship retrofi tting services. Sustainability, 9 (5), 1–27.

21. Newth, J., & Woods, C. (2014). Resistance to Social Entrepreneurship: How Context Shapes Innovation. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5 (2), 192–213.

22. Nikolaou, I. E., Nikolaidou, M. K., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2016). The response of small and medium-sized enterprises to potential water risks: an eco-cluster approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 4550–4557.

23. Powell, W., & Brantley, P. (1992). Competitive Cooperation in Biotechnology: Learning Through Networks? Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 387–397.

24. Scillitoe, J., Poonamallee, L., & Joy, S. (2018). Balancing Market Versus Social Strategic Orientations in Socio-Tech Ventures as Part of the Technology Innovation Adoption Process–Examples from the Global Healthcare Sector. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 9 (6), 257–287.

25. Williamson, O. (1991). Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly.