Preview

Moscow University Economics Bulletin

Advanced search

Marxism, mainstream and political economy

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-60-4-1

Abstract

The history of political economy in Russia is inextricably linked with the history of Moscow University, where the Department of Political Economy was established in 1804, when there was no yet either Marxism or mainstream as branches of classical political economy. Rapid development of capitalism in the 19th century became the basis for further development of political economy and the formation of neoclassical trend of economic theory, which further transformed into a generalized term ‘economics’. In future, the market principles of economics spread throughout the world, which predetermined the place of economics as the basis of economic science and economic education, highlighting it as a mainstream. However, despite the historical zigzags in the development of Russia, the Department of Political Economy retained its generic name while simultaneously teaching and researching all the schools of economic theory that arose in the 19th–21st centuries. This approach is consistent with one of the most important principles of Moscow State University — to foster fundamental and consistent university education of its graduates. Without diminishing the importance of any part of modern general economic theory, the article shows that it is political economy that forms the fundamentality and consistency of economic knowledge, constantly maintains a connection with economic development and its problems, revealing the leading role of an individual in the digital intellectual age.

About the Author

A. A. Porokhovsky
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Moscow



References

1. Georgieva, K. (202 4). Economic opportunities for my grandchildren. Finance & Development, June, 18–23. https://www.imf.org/ru/Publications/fandd/issues/2024/06/Economic-possibilities-for-my-grandchildren-Kristalina-Georgieva.

2. Keynes, J. M. (2009). The economic opportunities of our grandchildren. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 6, 60–67.

3. Laff ont, J.-J. (2008). Incentives and Political Economy. Translated from English by N. V. Shilova. 2nd ed. M.: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 312 p

4. Porokhovsky, A. A. (2020). Once again about political economy as a scientifi c and academic discipline (regarding the debated aspects of the problem). Russian Economic Journal. 5, 118–128. https://doi.оrg/10.33983/0130-2020-5-118-128.

5. Porokhovsky, A. A. (2024a). 220 years in the service of the Fatherland, economic science and education. Scientific research of the Faculty of Economics. Electronic journal, 16(3), 161– 174. https://doi.оrg/10.38050/2078-3809-2024-16-3-161-174.

6. Porokhovsky, A. A. (2024b) The signifi cance of A. Smith’s “invisible hand” in developing economic science. Lomonosov Economics Journal, 59(6), 39–49. https://doi.оrg/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-59-6-3.

7. Porokhovsky, A. A. (2024v). The fate of Marxism in the digital age. Problems in Political Economy, 4(40), 21–25. https://doi.оrg/10.5281/zenodo.14509266.

8. Ryazanov, V. T. (2019). Modern Political Economy: Prospects for a Neo-Marxist synthesis. St. Petersburg: Aleteya, 456 p.

9. Tatarkin, A. I., & Barsenev, V. L. (2006). Political economy and economics: special and general. Journal of Economic Theory, 4, 5–14.

10. The Political Economy of Russia: the dynamics of the Social contract since the 2000s (2010). Selected works of the Institute of the National project “Social Contract” 2000–2009. Compiled by A. A. Auzan and others. M., 720 p.

11. Yanzhul, I. I. (2005). The economic importance of honesty (A forgotten factor of production). Yanzhul I. I. Selected works. Moscow: Nauka, 402–420.

12. Bick, A., Blandin, A., & Deming, D. J. (2025). The rapid adoption of generative AI. NBER Working paper 32966, February, 34 p. https://www.nber.org/papers/w32966.

13. Bradford, A. (2023). Digital Empires. The Global Battle to Regulate Technology. New York: Oxford University Press, 624 p.

14. Calvino, F., & Fontanelli, L. (2023). A portrait of AI adopters across countries: Firm characteristics, assets’ complementarities and productivity. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, February, 86 p. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/Ofb79bb9-en.

15. Cohen, L., & Li, B. (2021). The Political Economy of Anti-Bribery Enforcement. NBER Working paper 29624, December, 71 p. https://www.nber.org/papers/w29624.

16. Gilpin R. (2001). Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press, X111 + 423 p.

17. Lancieri, F., Posner, E. A., & Zingales, L. (2022). The Political Economy of the Decline of Antitrust Enforcement in the United States. NBER Working paper 30326, August, 74 p. https://www.nber.org/papers/w30326.

18. Person, T., & Tabelini, G. (2000). Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge, Mass., London, England: The MIT Press, XIX+533 p.

19. Tiedrich, L., Perset, S., & Fialho, S. (2025). Intellectual property issues in Artifi cial Intelligence trained on scraped data. OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, 33. OECD Publishing, February, 49 p.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Porokhovsky A.A. Marxism, mainstream and political economy. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2025;(4):3-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-60-4-1

Views: 9


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0130-0105 (Print)