The world bids farewell to Utopias: time to reconsider development theories
https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-60-4-10
Abstract
By the end of XX century the constructed complex of economic theories was used as an implicit background under the Sustainable Development Goals of the UN 2015. In fact, the actual path of global development has moved along its own path. Collective efforts of economic policies to pull this path onto an attractive trajectory of well-being and sustainability were not very successful. Global governance crisis and evolving geopolitical conflicts had completed disillusionment. It is time to recognize the SDG idea as a quite positive by intentions but utopia. Actual condition and character of development have been undergoing different crises but pessimism should not drive us to a widespread hopelessness. Mankind – it appears – will not reach in this century either interstate or social equality, or stable climate with +1,5 C, or wellbeing for expected ten billion inhabitants of our planet. None of radical objectives of any social theories – pretending to dominate our thinking – will be achieved. And the very dream of utopia should be considered as a utopia. It is reasonable to recognize the fact that we do not fully realize global socio-economic forces. To create future realistic program of a global development it would be reasonable to initiate the program which we call “Critical analysis of the theoretical background of SDG”. As the decade of global governance destruction has demonstrated, no success can be expected without coordination of countries in the accepted logistic. The findings demonstrate the need for elaborating applied economic theories oriented towards a coordinated global survival.
About the Author
L. M. GrigoryevRussian Federation
Leonid M. Grigoryev, Professor, Academic Supervisor of Department of the World Economy, HSE
Moscow
References
1. Bobilev, S. N., & Grigoriev, L. M. (2021). In search of new frameworks for Sustainable Development Goals after COVID-19: BRICS countries. Electronic Journal, 13(10). https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2021-13-1-25-515.
2. Global and Russian Energy Outlook 2024 (Galkin, Yu. V., Galkina, A. A., Grigoriev, L. M., Grushevenko, D. A., Grushevenko, E. A., Grushevenko, E. V., Dementiev, K. I., et al.; edited by Kulagin, V. A. ). (2024). M.: INEI RAS.
3. Grigoryev, L. M. (2024). Empires of the Ancient — a crude tool of history. Lomonosov Economics Journal, 59(6), 125–160. https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-59-6-10.
4. Grigoriev, L. M., & Kurdin, A. A. (2013). Mechanisms of global governance: Economic analysis. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (7), 4–28.
5. Grigoriev, L. M., & Lyakhova, S. (2025). Unraveling the slowdown of the European Union. Russia in Global Affairs, 23(3), 83–105.
6. Grigoriev, L. M., & Maikhrovich, M. Ya. (2023). Growth theories and the realities of recent decades (issues of sociocultural codes — expanding the research program). Voprosy Ekonomiki, (2), 14–41. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-2-18-42.
7. Grigoriev, L. M., & Morozkina, A. K. (2021). Successful unstable industrialization of the world, 1880–1913. M.: Nestor — Istoriya.
8. Grigoriev, L. M., & Parshina, E. N. (2013). Economic dynamics of the world’s countries in 1992–2010: Uneven growth. St. Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, (4), 70–86.
9. Grigoriev, L. M., & Pavlyushina, V. A. (2022). International inequality: Dynamics and the development stage problem. In L. Grigoriev, A. Kurdin, I. Makarov (Eds.), World Economy in Times of Major Turmoil (p. 13–39). M.: INFRA-M.
10. Grigoriev, L. M., & Vasilieva, A. A. (2025). Inequality in EU countries in the fi rst quarter of the 21st century: Unusual trends. SME, 1(9). https://doi.org/10.17323/2949-5776-2025-3-1-6-30.
11. Grigoriev, L. M., & Zharonkina, D. V. (2024). The Chinese economy: Thirty years of catch-up development. Herald of International Organizations, 19(1), 176–200. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2024-01-08.
12. Independent Group of Scientists. (2023). Global Sustainable Development Report: Times of crisis, times of change: Science for accelerating transformations to sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/FINAL%20GSDR%202023-Digital%20-110923_1.pdf.
13. Maikhrovich, M.-Ya. (2025). The speed of convergence of development levels of world countries in the 21st century: Theoretical approaches and statistical limitations. Lomonosov Economics Journal, 60(5) [in press].
14. Makarov, I. A., & Shuranova, A. A. (2023). Climate change as a new factor in international relations. International Analytics, 14(4), 52–74.
15. World Economy in Times of Severe Shocks (L. Grigoriev, A. Kurdin, I. Makarov, Eds.). (2022). M.: INFRA-M.
16. Canuto, O., & Saraiva, B. (2025, July 21). BRICS in times of tectonic shifts. https://www.cmacrodev.com/brics-in-times-of-tectonic-shifts/.
17. Emissions gap report 2024. (2024). UNEP. https://www.unep.org/resources/emissionsgap-report-2024.
18. Galbraith, J. K. (2024, September 9). Economic theory for the real world. Project Syndicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org/magazine/modern-sciences-reveal-whymainstream-economics-has-failed-by-james-k-galbraith-2024-09.
19. Galbraith, J. K., & Chen, J. (2025). Entropy economics: The living basis of value and production. University of Chicago Press.
20. Global Debt Report. (2025). OECD.
21. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Rodrik, D. (2024, September 9). A new trilemma haunts the world economy. Project Syndicate.
23. The Berlin Summit Declaration. (2024, May 29). Forum New Economy. https://newforum.org/en/the-berlin-summit-declaration-winning-back-the-people/.
24. The Great Reversal. (2024). World Bank.
25. Times of crisis, times of change: Science for accelerating transformations to sustainable development. (2023). https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/FINAL%20GSDR%202023-Digital%20-110923_1.pdf.
26. World Development Report. (2024). The middle-income trap. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Review
For citations:
Grigoryev L.M. The world bids farewell to Utopias: time to reconsider development theories. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2025;(4):176-205. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-60-4-10