Moscow University in the world economic science (review of the international scientific conference)
https://doi.org/10.55959//MSU0130-0105-6-60-4-15
Abstract
Since its founding, Moscow University has set the tone for a whole bunch of research in economics, looking at the role of university science in Russian and global economic thought, its uniqueness, and the way the university's social functions, statutes, and educational policies have influenced the development of science. In this review of the conference held at the Faculty of Economics of Moscow State University on December 2–3, 2024, timed to coincide with the 270th anniversary of Moscow University and the 75th anniversary of the Department of History of Economy and Economic Thought, an attempt has been made to systematize the views of the conference participants expressed in their reports on history, characteristics, and prospects for the development of university economic disciplines. To this end, the author summarizes and systematizes the views of the speakers on the stages of evolution of university economic thought, the specifics of the political-economic discourse of the Soviet period, and the place of Moscow university school in world economic science. The paper identifies the uniqueness of the university economic tradition, rooted in history and consisting of pronounced interdisciplinarity, systematicity, attention to regional characteristics, and the importance of applied research. The views of conference participants on the functions of universities, in particular as a special scientific platform to carry out complex research and projects at the intersection of disciplines, are summarized. In connection with the historical perspective of the conference, the views of the speakers are analyzed separately.
References
1. Abalkin, L. I. (ed.) (2003). Essays on the History of Russian Economic Thought. M.
2. Andreev, A. Y. (2000). “Göttingen soul” of Moscow University (From the history of scientifi c mutual relations between Moscow and Göttingen at the beginning of the 19th century). Questions of the history of natural science and technology, 2, 71–113.
3. Auzan, A. A., & Kurdin, A. A. (2022). The institutional aspect of the evolution of scientifi c schools. Forecasting problems, 5(194), 91–99. Doi: 10.47711/0868-6351-194-91-99.
4. Avtonomov, V. S. (2016). Economic Theory at IMEMO: The Soviet Period. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 11, 117–134.
5. Babst, I. K. (1856/2016). On some conditions that contribute to the increase of national capital. Moscow University Bulletin, Series 6. Economics, 4, 35–60.
6. Bakhtin, M. M. (1975). The Word in the Novel. (1934–1935). Questions of the literature and aesthetics. Research of different years. M., 72–233.
7. Bulgakov, S. (1906/2007). Under the Banner of the University. Introductory Lecture to the Course “Critical Study of the Problems and Ideals of Political Economy”. History of economic and social doctrines. M., 273–285.
8. Bulgakov, S. (1909/1993). National economy and religious p ersonality. Works in 2 vol.
9. Chaplygina, I. G. (2019). Cameralism and economic disciplines at Moscow University in the 17th century. Terra Economicus, 17(4), 8–22. Doi: 10.23683/2073-6606-2019-17-4-80-94.
10. Galbraith, J. K. (1967/2004). The New industrial state. M.
11. Goland, Y. M. (2006). The discussions on economic policy during the years of monetary reform 1921–1924. M.
12. Ingrao, B. (2009/2022). Economics and Literature. Versus, 2(1), 9–42.
13. Karataev, N. K. (1956). Economic Sciences at Moscow University (1755–1955). M.
14. Kleiner, G. B. (2021). Systemic Economy: Steps of Development. M.
15. Makasheva, N. A. (2006). Economic science in Russia during the period of transformation (late 1980s — 1990s): revolution and growth of scientifi c knowledge. Istoki. M., 400–426.
16. Manuilov, A. A. (1914). Political Economy. Course of lectures. M.
17. Ortega y Gasset, J. (1930/2010). University mission. M.
18. Ptukha, M. V. (1959). Essays on the history of statistics in the USSR. Vol. II. M.
19. Schumpeter, J. (1942/1995). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. M.
20. Shmidt, O. (1923). Mathematical laws of money emission. M.
21. Slutzky, E. (1923). Mathematical notes on the theory of emission. Economic Bulletin of the Conjuncture Institute, 11–12.
22. Tugan-Baranovsky, M. I. (1907), Essays on the Modern History of Political Economy and Socialism. SPb.
23. Voronova, A. S. et al. (2024). The external factors in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions of students of Lomonosov Moscow State University for 2020–2024. Moscow University Bulletin, Series 6. Economics, 5, 265–286. https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-59-5-13.
24. Watts, M., & Smit, R. (1989/2006). Economics in Literature and Drama. Economic Policy, 2, 165–179.
25. Williamson, O. (1985/1996). The Economic institutions of capitalism. SPb.
26. Yurchak, A. (2014). It was forever, until it ended. The last Soviet generation. M.
27. Zweynert, J. (2007). The history of economic thought in Russia. 1805–1905. M.
28. Zharova, E. Y. (2013). The University Statutes of 1803–1804. Education issues, 4, 268– 290. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2011-4-268-290.
29. Arena, R., Dow, Sh., & Klaes, M. (ed.) (2009). Open economics. Economics in relation to other disciplines. Routledge
30. Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economics Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. The Rate and Direction on Incentive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, National Bureau of Economic Research, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
31. Avtonomov, V., & Hagemann, H. (2022). Russian and Western Economic Thought. Mutual Influences and Transfer of Ideas. Springer.
32. Burinа, E. (2023). Chemistry at the Service of Economic Modelling: Vladimir Bazarov’s Approach to Formalizing Business Cycles. Oeconomia. History, methodology, philosophy, 13-4, 995–1027. https://doi.org/10.4000/oeconomia.16566.
33. Clark, W. (1953). Academic Charisma and the Origins of the Research University. The University of Chicago Press.
34. Nelson, R. R. (1959). The Simple Economics of Basic Scientifi c Research. Journal of Political Economy, 67, 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1086/258177.
35. Nenovsky, N. (2024). Semyon Falkner and the Modern Monetary Theory: Contributions to the Russian Tradition in the Theory of Money. AlterEconomics, 21(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2024.21-1.4.
36. Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1.
Review
For citations:
Chaplygina I.G. Moscow University in the world economic science (review of the international scientific conference). Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2025;(4):297-318. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959//MSU0130-0105-6-60-4-15