NEOSHUMPETERIAN’S TESTING OF “CREATIVE” COMPETITION FACTORS: IMPLICATIONS FOR RUSSIA
https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105201852
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the current position of the schumpeterian competition. Interpreting schumpeterian competition as a struggle of entrepreneurial ideas, the author shows how the results of checking and developing Schumpeter’s ideas in contemporary neo- Schumpeterian literature. Focusing on the conditions that determine the innovative nature of competition, the author outlines the main features of the Russian economy, which prevent its transition to an innovative competition.
References
1. Балацкий Е. В. Технологическая диффузия и инвестиционные решения // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. - 2012. - № 3 (15).
2. Браун М. Гиперконкуренция: характерные особенности, движущие силы и управление // Проблемы теории и практики управления. - 1998. - № 3.
3. Нельсон Р. Р., Уинтер С. Дж. Эволюционная теория экономических изменений. - М.: Дело, 2002.
4. Полтерович В. М., Хенкин Г. М. Эволюционная модель взаимодействия процессов создания и заимствования технологий // Экономика и математические методы. - 1988. - Т. XXVI. - Вып. 6.
5. Попов Е. В. Эволюция институтов по Шумпетеру // Вестник ПНИПУ. Социально-экономические науки. - 2012. - № 14 (38).
6. Российский статистический ежегодник. - М.: Росстат, 2016.
7. Соколова Е. Конкуренция на инновационных рынках: особенности определения и анализа, 2012. URL: http://institutiones.com/innovations/2102- konkurenciya-na-innovacionnyx-rynkax.html (06/072017)
8. Сухарев О. С. Эволюционная макроэкономика в шумпетерианском прочтении // Вопросы экономики. - 2003. - № 11.
9. Сухарев О. С. Эволюционная макроэкономика: институциональные изменения, благосостояние, поведение агентов и рост. - Саратов: СГСЭУ, 2011.
10. Сухарев О. С. Эволюционная экономика, «неоклассика» и инновации: Й. Шумпетер, Я. Корнаи и эффекты моды // Инвестиции в России. - 2012. - № 7.
11. Тарануха Ю. В. Конкуренция: система и процесс. - М.: Дело и сервис, 2012.
12. Тарануха Ю. В. Постсоветский феномен номенклатурного предпринимательства: причины существования и пути преодоления // Экономист. - 2016а. - № 8.
13. Тарануха Ю. В. Конкуренция и конкурентные стратегии. - М.: RUScience, 2016b.
14. Татаркин А. И., Сухарев О. С., Стрижакова Е. Н. Шумпетерианская экономическая теория промышленной политики: влияние технологической структуры // Журнал экономической теории. - 2017. - № 2.
15. Шумпетер Й. Теория экономического развития. Капитализм, социализм и демократия. - М.: Эксмо, 2007 (Антология экономической мысли).
16. Annoni P., Rozovska K. EU Regional competitiveness Index 2010 RCI // European Commission, 2010.
17. Arena R. Schumpeter and Schumpeterians on competition: some policy implications // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. - January 2017. - Vol. 27 (1).
18. Atkinson R. D., Nager A. B. The 2014 State New Economy Index. Benchmarking Economic Transformation in the States // Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, 2014.
19. Aveni, d’ R. А. Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering. - N.Y.: The Free Press, 1994.
20. Barney J. B. Types of competition and the theory of strategy: Toward an integrative framework // Academy of management review. - 1986. - Т. 11. - Nо. 4.
21. Baumol W., Panzar J., Willing R. Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. - N.Y., 1982.
22. Baumol W. J. Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive and destructive // Journal of political economy. - 1990. - Vol. 98. - Nо. 5. - Pt. 1.
23. Baumol W. J. Entrepreneurship, Innovation and the Growth: The David and Goliath Symbiosis // Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance. - 2002. - Vol. 7. - Iss. 2.
24. Bresnahan T. F., Greenstein S., Henderson R. M. Schumpeterian Competition and Diseconomies of Scope. Illustrations from the Histories of Microsoft and IBM // The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Revisited. Ed. by Lerner, J and Stern S. - Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2012.
25. Cohen W. M., Levin R. C. Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure // In R. Schmalensee and RD. Willig (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization. - Oxford, England: Elsener Ltd., 1989. - Vol. II. - Ch.18.
26. Cohen W. M., Levin R. C., Mowery D. C. Firm size and R&D intensity: A re- examination // Journal of Industrial Economics. - 1987. - 35.
27. Demsetz H. Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy // Journal of Law and Economics. - 1973. - Vol. 16. - April.
28. Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and dire ctions of technical change // Res Policy. - 1982. - Nо. 11(3).
29. Evans D. S., Schmalensee R. Some Economic Aspects of Antitrust Analysis in Dynamically Competitive Industries // Innovation Policy and the Economy. - 2002. - Vol. 2.
30. Freeman C. Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. - London, 1987.
31. Futia C. Schumpeterian competition // Quarterly Journal of Economics. - 1980. - 94.
32. Gilbert R. Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where Are We in the Competition - Innovation Debate? // Innovation policy and the economy. - 2006. - Т. 6.
33. Hanusch H., Pyka A. Principles of Neo-Schumpeterian Economics // Cambridge Journal Economics. - 2007. - Vol. 31 (2).
34. Hodgson G. The Evolutionary and Non-Darwinian Economics of Joseph Schumpeter // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. - 1997. - Vol. 7.
35. Iwai K. Schumpeterian dynamics: An evolutionary model of innovation and imitation // Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. - 1984. - Nо. 5.
36. Jose Tavares de Araujo Jr. Schumpeterian Competition and its Policy Implications: The Latin American Case. OAS Trade Unit, April. 1999. URL: http://www.sice. oas.org/compol/Articles/schumcop.asp
37. Lundval, Bengt-Åke, ed. National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. - Pinter Publishers, London, 1992.
38. MacCraw T. Joseph Schumpeter on competition // Competition Policy International. - 2008. - Vol. 3 (1).
39. Metcalf J. S. Evolutionary economics and creative destruction. The Gratz Schumpeter lectures. - London and New York: Routledge, 1988.
40. Moore J. F. The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. - N. Y.: Harper Business, 1996.
41. Myong-Hun Chang. Muddling through the Gales of Creative Destruction: A Non- Equilibrium Computational Model of Schumpeterian Competition. URL: http:// academic.csuohio.edu/changm/main/research/papers/schumpeter_9_4_12. pdf 06.07.2017
42. Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. Forces generating and limiting concentration under Schumpeterian competition // Bell Journal of Economics. - 1978. - Nо. 9.
43. Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. The Schumpeterian tradeoff revisited // American Economic Review. - 1982. - Nо. 72.
44. Phillips A. Patents, potential competition, and technical progress // American Economic Review. - 1966. - Nо. 56.
45. Phillips A. Technology and market structure. - Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath, 1971.
46. Popov E. V. Minieconomics as a Separate Part of Microeconomics // Atlantic Economic Journal. - 2005. - Vol. 32.
47. Pyka A., Cantner U., ElgarE. (Ed.) Recent Advanced in Neo-Schumpeterian Economics. Essays in Honour of Horst Hanusch // Cheltenham UK, Northampton. MA. USA, 2009.
48. Rashid S. Quality in Contestable Markets: A Historical Problem? // Quarterly Journal of Economics. - 1988. - Vol. 103. - Nо. 1. - February.
49. Saviotti P. P., Pyka A. Generalized barriers to entry and economic development. FZID Discussion paper 03-2009. 2009. URL: https://fzid.uni-hohenheim. de/71978.htm
50. Schumpeter J. A. The Sociology of Imperialism // Imperialism. Social classes. Two essay by Joseph Schumpeter. - Meridian book, Cleveland - New York, 1955.
51. Shionoya Y. Schumpeter and the idea of social science - a metatheoretical study. - Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1977.
52. Silverber G., Dosi G.,Orsenigo L. Innovation, Diversity and Diffusion: A Self- Organization Model // Economic Journal. - 1988. - Vol. 98.
53. Singleton R. Competition Policy for Developing Countries: A Long-Run, Entry- Based Approach // Contemporary Economic Policy. - 1997. - Vol. 15. - April.
54. Streb J. How to win Schumpeterian Competition. Technological Transfers in the German Plastics Industry from the 1930s to the 1970s. // Economic Growth Center Yale University. Center discussion paper. - 1999. - Nо. 811. - September.
Review
For citations:
Taranukha Yu.V. NEOSHUMPETERIAN’S TESTING OF “CREATIVE” COMPETITION FACTORS: IMPLICATIONS FOR RUSSIA. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2018;(5):21-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105201852
Views:
371
Email this article 