AGING OF FERTILITY: MEASUREMENT METHODS, STAGES, TYPOLOGY
https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105201858
Abstract
Current trends in fertility are similar in most countries of the world. To reduce the level of fertility, actively manifested since the second half of the last century, important changes in the calendar of births were added. The classical indicators of demographic statistics are more often dealing with the intensity of fertility, to a lesser extent - with the timing of fertility. The authors made an attempt to compile a system of indicators for the timing, which was then used to study the stages and types of ageing of fertility.
About the Authors
I. E. Kalabikhina
МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. S. Smulyanskaya
МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. лет со дня рождения Роберта Рене Кучинского (1876-1947)// Демоскоп. - 2006. - № 263-264. - 30 октября - 12 ноября 2006. URL: http://www. demoscope.ru/weekly/2006/0263/nauka03.php (дата обращения: 22.08.2018).
2. Соботка Т., Лутц В. Коэффициент суммарной рождаемости дает политикам дезориентирующие сигналы: не следует ли отказаться от использования этого показателя? // Экономический журнал Высшей школы экономики. - 2011. - Т. 15. - № 4. - С. 444-471.
3. Фрейка Т., Захаров С. Эволюция рождаемости за последние полвека в России: оптика условных и реальных поколений // Демографическое обозрение. - 2014. - № 1. - С. 106-143.
4. Balbo N., Billari F. C., Mills M. Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research // Eur J Population. - 2013. - Vol. 29. - No. 1. - P. 1-38.
5. Barkalov N. B. Parity. А Brief Introduction to Formal Demographic Fertility Analysis. Lecture Notes. - Moscow: TEIS, 2004.
6. Barkalov N., Dorbritz J. Measuring period parity-progression ratios with competing techniques. An application to East Germany // Zeitschrift fur Bevolkerungswissenschaf. - 1996. - Vol. 21. - No. 4. - P. 459-505.
7. Bongaarts J., Feeney G. On the quantum and tempo of fertility // Population and Development Review. - 1998. - Vol. 29. - No. 1. - P. 271-291.
8. Feeney G. and Yu J. Y. Period Parity Progression Measures of Fertility in China // Population Studies. - 1987. - Vol. 41. - No. 1. - P. 77-102.
9. Imhoff E. On the impossibility of inferring cohort fertility measures from period fertility measures // Demographic Research. - 2001. - No. 5. - P. 23-64.
10. Ní Bhrolcháin M. Period Parity Progression Ratios and Birth Intervals in England and Wales, 1941-1971: A Synthetic Life-Table Analysis // Population Studies. - 1987. - Vol. 41. - No. 1. - P. 103-125.
11. Nisén et al. Age-specific fertility by educational level in the Finnish male cohort born 1940-50 // Demographic Research. - 2014. - Vol. 31. - No. 5. - P. 119-136.
12. Ortega J., Kohler H. Measuring Low Fertility: Rethinking Demographic Methods // Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research Working Paper, 2002.
13. Rallu, J.-L., Toulemon L. Period Fertility Measures: the construction of different indices and their application to France, 1946-89. // Population: An English Selection. - 1994. - No. 6. - P. 59-94.
14. Sobotka T. Is lowest-low fertility in Europe explained by the postponement of childbearing? // Population and Development Review. - 2004. - No. 2. - P. 195-220.
15. Sobotka T. Tempo-Quantum and Period-Cohort Interplay in Fertility Changes in Europe. Evidence from the Czech Republic, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden // Demographic Research. - 2003. - Vol. 8. - P. 151-214.
16. Toulemon L., Pailhé A., Rossier C. France: High and stable fertility // Demographic Research. - 2008. - Vol. 19. - P. 503-556.
Review
For citations:
Kalabikhina I.E., Smulyanskaya N.S. AGING OF FERTILITY: MEASUREMENT METHODS, STAGES, TYPOLOGY. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2018;(5):149-166. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105201858
Views:
296
Email this article 