APPLICATION OF THE VALUE APPROACH TO MOTIVATING STUDENTS' INTELLECTUAL ACTIVITY
https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105201864
Abstract
Intellectual activity of students requires a special approach towards the system of organization and management of this process. Drawing on the institutional approach, the paper shows the interdependence between the values and norms of the institution and the basic values of students in terms of enhancing their intellectual activity and the formation of human capital of students, as well as the maintenance and development of the intellective potential of the institution. The authors first explore the peculiar forms of presenting in the educational process the basic values of students and university facilitating the efficiency and diligence of students, then present the key values crucial for further functioning and development of students' education system. The article identifies the factors that determine the education system functionality. Among such factors are teaching methodology, the system of periodic and current evaluation of students work, the organization of the learning process, the forms of motivation. The findings demonstrate the influence of students basic values on their intellectual activity, the role of these values in educational and scientific activity of students, the growing impact of the values of higher education institutions on their intellectual activity and intellective capital through the system of students motivation.
About the Authors
Ж. Мингалева
Пермский национальный исследовательский политехнический университет
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Л. Депутатова
Пермский национальный исследовательский политехнический университет
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Генкин Б. М. Экономика и социология труда: учебник для вузов. - 5-е изд., доп. - М.: Норма, 2003. - 416 с.
2. Герчиков В. И. Управление персоналом: работник - самый эффективный ресурс компании. - М.: ИНФРА-М, 2008. - С. 282.
3. Жданкин Н. А. Мотивация персонала. Измерение и анализ: учебно-практ. пособие. - М.: Финпресс, 2010. - 272 с.
4. Мингалева Ж. А., Мирских И. Ю. Развитие инфраструктуры инновационной деятельности в условиях глобализации // Экономика и предпринимательство. - 2014. - № 11-2 (52-2). - С. 140-142.
5. Российские вузы глазами студентов - 2018 // РИА Новости. Официальный сайт. URL: ria.ru/abitura_rus/20180219/1514698142.html (проверено: 29.08.2018).
6. Ames Carole A. «Motivation: What Teachers Need to Know.» Teachers College Record 91.3 (1990): 409-421. Academic Search Premier. 12 November 2009. URL: http://search.ebscohost.com
7. Archer J. Achievement Goals as a Measure of Motivation in University Students // Contemporary Educational Psychology. - 1994. - Vol. 19. - No. 4. - Р. 430-446.
8. Bain K. What the Best College Teachers Do. // Harvard University Press. - 2004. - Р. 32-42.
9. Bok H. G. J., Teunissen P. W., Favier R. P., Rietbroek N. J., Theyse L. F. H., Brommer H.,.. Jaarsma D. A. D. C. Programmatic assessment of competency-based workplace learning: when theory meets practice // BMC Medical Education. - 2013. - Vol. 13. - Р. 123.
10. Davis B. G. Motivating Students: In Tools for Teaching. - San Francisco: Jossey- Bass, 1993. - Р. 193-201.
11. DeLong M., & Winter D. Learning to Teaching and Teaching to Learn Mathematics: Resources for Professional Development // Mathematical Association of America. - 2002. - Р. 159-168.
12. Deputatova L. N., Mukhina E. R., Marinina A. V., Postnikov V. P., & Lazukova E. A. The development of management system of intellectual work for increasing energy efficiency of companies. // International Review of Management and Marketing. - 2016. - Vol. 6. - No. 5S: Special Iss. - P. 42-48.
13. Dupeyrat C., Mariné C. Implicit Theories of Intelligence, Goal Orientation, Cognitive Engagement, and Achievement: A Test of Dweck’s Model with Returning to School Adults // Contemporary Educational Psychology. - 2005. - Vol. 30. - P. 43-59.
14. García-Ros R., Pérez-González F., Cavas-Martínez F., & Tomás J. M. Social interac- tion learning strategies, motivation, first-year students’ experiences and permanence in university studies // Educational Psychology. - 2018. - Vol. 38. - No. 4. - P. 451-469.
15. Hattie J. A. C. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. - London, UK: Routledge, 2009.
16. Hattie J. A. C., Anderman E. International guide to student achievement. - New York, NY: Routledge, 2013.
17. Henderson-King D., Smith M. N. Meanings of education for university students: Academic motivation and personal values as predictors // Social Psychology of Education. - 2006. - Vol. 9. - No. 2. - P. 195-221.
18. Herzberg F. The motivation to work: In Frederick Herzberg, Bernard Mausner, Barbara Bloch Snyderman: with a new introduction by Frederick Herzberg, 1992.
19. Howell A. J., Buro K. Implicit beliefs, achievement goals, and procrastination: A meditational analysis // Learning and Individual Differences. - 2009. - Vol. 19. - P. 151-154.
20. Husman J., Lens J. The role of the future in student motivation // Educational Psychology. - 1999. - Vol. 34. - P. 113-125.
21. Law J., Rush R., Schoon I., Parsons S. Modeling developmental language difficulties from school entry into adulthood: literacy, mental health, and employment outcomes // Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. - 2009. - Vol. 52. - P. 1401-1416.
22. Lepper M. R. Motivational Considerations in the Study of Instruction // Cognition and Instruction. - 1988. - Vol. 5. - No. 4. - P. 289-309.
23. Lizzio A., Wilson K., Simons R. University Students’ Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: Implications for Theory and Practice // Studies in Higher Education. - 2002. - Vol. 27. - P. 27-52.
24. Maehr M. L., Midgley C. Enhancing Student Motivation: A Schoolwide Approach // Educational Psychologist. - 1991. - Vol. 26. - P. 399-427.
25. Maharaj C., Blair E., Chin Yuen Kee S. The motivation to study: an analysis of undergraduate engineering students at a Caribbean university // Journal of Further and Higher Education. - 2018. - Vol. 42. - No. 1. - P. 24-35.
26. Mamaril N. J. Measuring Undergraduate Students Engineering Self-Efficacy: A Scale Validation Study. - University of Kentucky, 2014.
27. Mamaril N. A., Usher E. L., Li C. R., Economy D. R., Kennedy M. S. Measuring Undergraduate Students’Engineering Self-Efficacy: A Validation Study // Journal of Engineering Education. - 2016. Vol. 105. - No. 2. - P. 366-395.
28. Maslow A. H. Motivation and Personality. Third Ed. - NY: Addison-Wesley, 1987.
29. McClelland D. Motivation person. - SPb.: Peter, 2007.
30. Mingaleva Z., Deputatova L., Starkov Y. Values and norms in the modern organization as the basis for innovative development // International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research. - 2016. - Vol. 14. - No. 9. - Р. 5799-5808.
31. Mingaleva Zh., Mirskikh I. On innovation and knowledge economy in Russia. // World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. - 2010. - Vol. 66. - P. 1032-1041.
32. Nilson L. Teaching At Its Best: A Research-Based Resource for College Instructors, 2nd edition. - Anker Publishing, 2003.
33. Ramsden P. Learning to Teach in Higher Education, Routledge, 1992.
34. Robins R. W., Pals J. L. Implicit Self-Theories in the Academic Domain: Implications for Goal Orientation, Attributions, Affect, and Self-Esteem Change // Self and Identity. - 2002. - Vol. 1. - P. 313-336.
35. Savage N., Birch R., Noussi E. (2011). Motivation of engineering students in higher education. // Engineering Education. - 2011. - Vol. 6. - No. 2. - P. 39-46.
36. Stipek D. Motivation to Learn: From Theory to Practice. - Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2001.
37. Winn W. Research into practice: Current trends in educational technology research: The study of learning environments // Educational Psychology Review. - 2002. - Vol. 14. - No. 3. - P. 331-351.
38. Wohlgemuth D., Whalen D., Sullivan J., Nading Ca, Shelley M., Wang Y.(R.). Financial, Academic, and Environmental Influences on the Retention and Graduation of Students // Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice. - 2007. - Vol. 8. - No. 4. - P. 457-475.
39. Yıldız M. L., Özcan E. D. Organizational Climate as a moderator of the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Creativit // International Journal of Business and Management. - 2014. - Vol. II. - No. 1. - P. 76-87.
40. Zajacova A., Lynch S. M., Espenshade T. J. Self-efficacy, stress, and academic success in college // Research in Higher Education. - 2005. - Vol. 46. - P. 677-706.
Review
For citations:
, APPLICATION OF THE VALUE APPROACH TO MOTIVATING STUDENTS' INTELLECTUAL ACTIVITY. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2018;(6):59-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105201864
Views:
300
Email this article 