DEVELOPMENT OF COMPETITION ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FOR RETAIL ELECTRICITY MARKET IN RUSSIA
https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105201925
Abstract
The article examines the competition assessment methodology for retail electricity markets, practiced by antimonopoly regulation agency in Russia. On the side it reviews the system of ranking competition assessment used by regulatory authorities in the European countries with electricity markets successful liberalization and competitive environment. The appropriate recommendations are developed to enhance the competition assessment methodology for retail electricity markets in Russia.
About the Authors
O. O. MozgovayaRussian Federation
S. A. Turbina
Russian Federation
V. V. Kuznetsov
Russian Federation
References
1. Kurdin A.A. Alternativnye pokazateli dlya otsenki sostoyaniya konkurentsii na tovarnykh rynkakh. Byulleten konkurentnoy politiki // Laboratoriya problem konkurentsii i konkurentnoy politiki MGU. — 2012. — No 8. — S. 22.
2. Mozgovaya O. O. Analiz zarubezhnogo opyta razvitiya konkurencii na roznichnom rynke ehlektricheskoj ehnergii // Vestnik Universiteta. — 2018. — No 10. — S. 108–116.
3. Mozgovaya O.O. Problemy razvitiya konkurencii na roznichnom rynke ehlektricheskoj ehnergii Rossijskoj Federacii // Vestnik Universiteta. — 2018. — No 11. — S. 128–135.
4. Obzor sostoyaniya konkurencii na roznichny`x ry`nkax e`lektricheskoj e`nergii i moshhnosti v 2016 godu // FAS, 2017.
5. Prikaz Federalnoy antimonopolnoy sluzhby No 220 ot 28.04.2010 «Ob utverzhdenii poryadka provedeniya analiza sostoyaniya konkurentsii na tovarnom rynke» (zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 02.08.2010 No 18026).
6. Radchenko T. A., Sukhorukova K. A. Otsenki urovnya konkurentsii i sostoyaniya konkurentnoy sredy: obzor metodov i rezultaty oprosov v 2014–2016 gg. // The theory competition. — 2016. — No 15 (59). — S. 28–46.
7. Reshenie Soveta Evrazijskoj ehkonomicheskoj komissii ot 30.01.2013 No 7 (red. ot 21.12.2016) «O Metodike ocenki sostoyaniya konkurencii».
8. Selevich T.S. Metody otsenki intensivnosti konkurentsii // Trudy II Oblastnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii studentov i molodykh uchenykh, aspirantov i molodykh uchenykh «Energiya molodykh — ekonomike Rossii». — 2004. — T. 1. — S. 58–60.
9. Sopova Ye. V., Shcherbinina L. Yu. Obzor metodik po otsenke urovnya konkurentsii na rynke // Voprosy ekonomiki i upravleniya. — 2016. — No 3.1. — S. 47–49.
10. Fedin M. Yu. EHffektivno upravlyat’ mozhno lish’ tem, chto mozhno dostoverno izmerit’. Sbalansirovannaya sistema pokazatelej (Balanced Scorecard) i upravlenie rossijskimi kompaniyami // Top-manager. — 2003. — No 11.
11. Electricity retail market models. Final report / Poyry, 2017. — P. 57.
12. Energy Retail Markets Comparability Study. A report for DECC / London Economics, 2012. — P. 180.
13. Market Design. Common Nordic end-user market / Nordic Energy Regulators // 2009. — P. 189.
14. Monitoringbericht 2017 / Die Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Gas, Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen, Bundesnetzagentur, 2017. — P. 492.
15. National Report 2017 / Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE), 2017. — P. 42.
16. National report Denmark 2017. Status for 2016 / Danish Energy Regulatory Authority, 2017. — PP.65.
17. Retail Energy Markets in 2016 / OFGEM, 2016. — P. 76.
18. Retail Market Indicators / OFGEM [Электронный ресурс]. London., сор. 2018. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/data-portal/retail-market-indicators
19. The Retail Markets Monitoring Report. CIBM WG/MMR TF. CEER Report / Council of European Energy Regulators, 2017. — P. 54.
20. The state of energy. How far have the energy markets come for consumers in 2017? // OFGEM: официальный сайт. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/energy-markets/ (дата обращения: 17.09.2018).
21. The Swedish Electricity and Natural Gas Market 2016 / Swedish Energy Markets Inspectorate (Energimarknadsinspektionen) — Eskilstuna, 2017. — P. 78.
Review
For citations:
Mozgovaya O.O., Turbina S.A., Kuznetsov V.V. DEVELOPMENT OF COMPETITION ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FOR RETAIL ELECTRICITY MARKET IN RUSSIA. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2019;(2):83-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105201925