Endogenous nature of money supply in conditions of financial assets digitalization
https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202022
Abstract
The paper discusses the endogenous nature of money supply for national economy in conditions of financial assets digitalization. The relevance of the research is justified by a changing economic environment in which money and other financial assets can act in a digital form. The objective of the study is to describe the possible changes in the money supply with adding digital financial assets to the household portfolio with the use of endoteric approach. We use the post-Keynesian postulates, in particular, horizontalizm, to describe the process of endogenous money creation by the banking system through lending. The underlying methodology is based on the use of stock-flow consistent (SFC) modeling approach. Unlike previous research, the article considers a wider range of financial instruments in portfolios of macroeconomic agents, which made it possible to specify the demand for credit more fully. It is concluded that the adding “new” digital financial assets to portfolios is likely to affect the expansion of savings diversification, rather than endogenous money supply. The importance of real output and disposable income growth for changing in savings, investments and the demand for credit is outlined.
About the Author
O. V. LunyakovRussian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Backus D., Brainard W., Smith G., Tobin, J. A model of U. S. financial and non-financial behavior // Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. — 1980. — Vol. 12. — No. 2. — P. 259–293.
2. Caverzasi E., Godin A. Post-Keynesian stock-flow-consistent modelling: a survey // Cambridge Journal of Economics. — 2015. — Vol. 39. — No. 1. — P. 157–187.
3. Docherty P. Money and Employment: A Study of the Theoretical Implications of Endogenous Money. — Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2005.
4. Godley W. Money and credit in a Keynesian model of income determination // Cambridge Journal of Economics. — 1999. — Vol. 23. — No. 4 (July). — P. 393–411.
5. Godley W. Money, finance and national income determination: An integrated approach // Working Paper No. 167, The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, 1996. URL: https://ideas.repec.org/p/lev/wrkpap/wp_167.html (дата обращения: 10.05.2019).
6. Godley W., Lavoie M. Monetary Economics: An Integrated Approach to Credit, Money, Income, Production and Wealth. — New York: Palgrave, Macmillan, 2012.
7. Goodhart C. Monetary Theory and Practice: The UK Experience. — London: Macmillan, 1984.
8. Kaldor N. The new monetaris // Lloyds Bank Review. — l970. — Vol. 97. — P. 1–7.
9. Kaldor N. The Scourge of Monetarism. — New York: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.
10. Lavoie M. Horizontalism, structuralism, liquidity preference and the principle of increasing risk // Scottish Journal of Political Economy. — l996. — Vol. 43 (August). — P. 275–300.
11. Lavoie M. Endogenous money: Accommodationist // A Handbook of Alternative Monetary Economics / P. Arestis, M. Sawyer. — Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. — 2006. — P. 17–34.
12. Lavoie M., Reissl S. Further insights on endogenous money and the liquidity preference theory of interest // FMM Working Paper 17-2018, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute. URL: https://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_fmm_imk_wp_17_2018.pdf (дата обращения: 10.05.2019).
13. Makrelov K., Arndt Ch., Davies R., Harris L. Stock-and-flow-consistent macroeconomic model for South Africa // WIDER Working Paper Series 007, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER), 2018. URL: https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/Publications/Working-paper/PDF/wp2018-7.pdf (дата обращения: 13.05.2019).
14. Miess M., Schmelzer S. Extension of the Empirical Stock-Flow Consistent (SFC) Model for Austria: Implementation of Several Asset Classes, a Detailed Tax System and Exploratory Scenarios // Research report, 2016. URL: http://irihs.ihs.ac.at/4135 (дата обращения: 13.05.2019).
15. Moore B. J. The endogenous money supply // Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. — l988. — Vol. 10. — No. 3. — P. 372–385.
16. Nikiforos M., G. Zezza. Stock-flow Consistent Macroeconomic Models: A Survey // Journal of Economic Surveys. — 2017. — Vol. 31. — No. 5. — P. 1204–1239.
17. Palley T. I. The endogenous money supply: Consensus and disagreement // Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. — l991. — Vol. 13. — P. 397–403.
18. Palley T. I. Horizontalists, verticalists, and structuralists: the theory of endogenous money reassessed // Review of Keynesian Economics. — 2013. — Vol. 1. — No. 4. — P. 406–424.
19. Palley T. I. Bank lending, discount window borrowing, and the endogenous money supply: A theoretical framework // Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. — 1987/88. — Vol. X. — No. 2. — P. 282–303.
20. Palley T. I. Competing views of the money supply process: Theory and evidence // Metroeconomica. — 1994. — Vol. 45. — No. 1. — P. 67–88.
21. Pollin R. Two theories of money supply endogeneity: Some empirical evidence // Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. — 1991. — Vol. 13. — P. 366–396.
22. Pollin R. Considerations on interest rate exogeneity: To what extent does the market determine rates? // Working Paper 177, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts. — Amherst, 2008. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254455302_Considerations_on_Interest_Rate_Exogeneity (дата обращения: 12.05.2019).
23. Sawyer M. Endogenous money and the tyranny of demand and supply // Advances in Endogenous Money Analysis / L.-P. Rochon, S. Rossi. — Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. — 2017. — P. 227–244.
24. Tobin J. A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory // Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. — 1969. — Vol. 1. — No. 1. — P. 15–29.
25. Tobin J. Money and finance in the macroeconomic process // Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. — 1982. — Vol. 14. — No. 2. — P. 171–204.
26. Wray L. Alternative theories of the rate of interest // Cambridge Journal of Economics. — 1992. — Vol. 16. — No. 1 (March). — P. 69–91.
Review
For citations:
Lunyakov O.V. Endogenous nature of money supply in conditions of financial assets digitalization. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2020;(2):28-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202022