Comparative analysis of “catch-up modernization” models in Russia and Japan
https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202036
Abstract
The article presents the author’s classification of the “catching-up modernization” models typical for Russia and Japan at the initial stage of acceleration of industrial development. The common features of the “state-national” model (Japan) and the “least resistance” model (Russia) are identified and characterized, and their comparative analysis is carried out. Particular attention is paid to the country features that have had a huge impact on the formation of national types of “catch-up modernization” model and their practical implementation. The role of the state, traditionally strong in Russia and Japan, is noted, and its change in the process of “catching up modernization” is traced. The degree of influence of endogenous and exogenous factors on the implementation of large-scale transformation of Russian and Japanese economic systems is analyzed. It is concluded that the development of national economies of the countries under consideration was a natural result and reflection of their types of the model of “catching-up modernization”.
About the Authors
V. P. Zolotareva
Moscow Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
O. N. Emelyanova
IMEMO RAN
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Vajnshtejn A.L. Narodnoe bogatstvo i narodnohozyajstvennoe nakoplenie predrevolyucionnoj Rossii. — M.: Gosstatizdat, 1960.
2. Verisockaya E. V. Obshchestvo i reform obrazovaniya v YAponii na nachal’nom etape modernizacii (1870–1880-e gody) // Izvestiya Vostochnogo instituta. — 1998. — S. 115–128.
3. Drozdov V. V., Pogrebinskaya V. A., Zolotareva V. P. Evolyuciya modelej dogonyayushchej modernizacii Rossii vo vtoroj polovine XIX — nachale XXI v. // Federalizm. — 2018. — No 4. — S. 184–191.
4. Emel’yanova O.N. Opyt dogonyayushchego razvitiya: promyshlennaya politika v YAponii (1870–1880 gg.) // Problemy sovremennoj ekonomiki. — 2017. — No 3. — S. 234–240.
5. Emel’yanova O. N., SHCHerbakov D. A. O haraktere i metodah social’no-ekonomicheskih preobrazovanij YAponii 60-h — 70-h godah XIX veka // YAponiya nashih dnej. — 2012. — No 14. — S. 53–77.
6. Zolotareva V.P. Osobennostimodeli «dogonyayushchego razvitiya» v Rossii na rubezhe XIX–XX vv. // Gorizonty ekonomiki. — 2016. — No 3 (29). — S. 7–10.
7. Zolotareva V.P. Tipologizaciya modelej «dogonyayushchego razvitiya» v stranah «vtorogo eshelona kapitalizma» // Gorizonty ekonomiki. — 2016. — No 2 (28). — S. 33–41.
8. Istoriya YAponii / Pod red. A. E. ZHukova. T. 2. — M.: Institut vostokovedeniya RAN, 1998.
9. Kagarlickij B.YU. Periferijnaya imperiya Rossiya i mirosistema. — M.: Lenand, 2016.
10. Krasil’shchikov V. A. Vdogonku za proshedshim vekom: Razvitie Rossii v XX veke s tochki zreniya mirovyh modernizacij. — M.: ROSSPEN, 1998.
11. Lapina S. N., Lelyuhina N. D. Gosudarstvennaya sobstvennost’ v Rossii: nekotorye istoricheskie uroki // Sobstvennost’ v HKH stoletii: K 80-letiyu akad. V. A. Vinogradova. — M.: ROSSPEN, 2001. — S. 216–223.
12. Lyashchenko P. I. Istoriya narodnogo hozyajstva SSSR. T. 2. — M.: OGIZ, 1948.
13. Mel’yancev V. A. Vostok i Zapad vovtorom tysyacheletii: ekonomika, istoriya i sovremennost’. — M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1996.
14. Ocherk razvitiya i deyatel’nosti gosudarstvennyh sberegatel’nyh kass. — SPb., 1912.
15. Pevzner YA. A. Monopolisticheskij capital YAponii. — M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1950.
16. Petrov YU. A. Moskovskaya burzhuaziya i problem promyshlennogo finansirovaniya v konce XIX — nachale XX v. // Reformy vtoroj poloviny 17–20 vv.: podgotovka, provedenie, rezul’taty: sb. nauch. tr. — M.: Institut istorii SSSR AN SSSR, 1989. — S. 108–128.
17. Prasol A. F. YAponskoe obrazovanie v epohu Mejdzi (1868–1912). — Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 2002.
18. Rashin A. G. Naselenie Rossiiza 100 let (1811–1913 gg.): Stat. ocherki / pod red. akad. S. G. Strumilina. — M.: Gospolitizdat, 1956.
19. Social’no-ekonomicheskaya istoriya Rossii / Pod red.A. G. Hudokormova. — M.: NIC «Infra-M», 2017.
20. Strumilin S. G. Ocherk isovetskoj ekonomiki. — M.: Gos. soc.-ekon. izd-vo, 1930.
21. Hrolenok S. F. Zolotopromyshlennost’ Sibiri (1832–1917). Irkutsk: Izd-voIrkut. un-ta, 1990.
22. Ishii Kanji. Nihon keizaishi. — Tokyo: Tokyo daigaku shuppankai, 2006.
23. Kajinishi Mitsuhaya. Nihon shihon shugi hattatsushi. Sangyo shihon-no seiritsuto hatten. — Tokyo: Toyo keizai shinposha, 1958.
24. Kingendai nihon keizaishi yoran. Ed. By Miva Ryoichi, Hara Akira. — Tokyo, 2010.
25. Nakagawa Keiichiro. Dainiji taisenzen no nihon ni okeru sangyo kozo to kigyosha katsudo. Kansetsu kin’yu taisei to sogoshosha-wo chushin // Mitsui bunko ronso. — 1969. — No 3. — S. 189–214.
26. Nakamura Takafusa. Nihon keizai. T. 3. — Tokyo: Tokyo daigaku shuppankai, 1993.
27. Okazaki Tetsuji. Mochikabu kaisha-no rekishi — zaibatsuto kigyo tochi. — Tokyo: Chikuma shinshyo, 1999.
28. Ota Yoshiyuki. Nihon keizai no nisennen. — Tokyo: Keiso Shobo, 1997.
29. Hashimoto Juro, Takeda Haruhito. Nihon Keizai hatten to kigyoshudan. — Tokyo: Tokyo daigaku syuppansha, 1992.
Review
For citations:
Zolotareva V.P., Emelyanova O.N. Comparative analysis of “catch-up modernization” models in Russia and Japan. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2020;(3):126-140. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202036
Views:
283
Email this article 