Preview

Moscow University Economics Bulletin

Advanced search

Identifying generational differences in consumers’ decision to use shared services in Russia

https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202048

Abstract

Digital transformation and rapid development of Internet technologies in the past decade have contributed to the emergence of an innovative business model of collaborative consumption [Sheresheva, Katsoni, 2019] and the spread of collaborative consumption services (CCS). This study attempts to identify the factors that influence consumers’ decision to use CCS, drawing on generation differences formulated on the basis of generation theory, with a particular focus on Russian consumers. The factors highlighted as a result of systematization of existing studies have been tested on the data of a quantitative study conducted in the form of an online survey with a sample of 3635 Russian users of CCS. An explanatory factor analysis (EFA) helps the authors construct the framework of factors that influence the decision of three generations of consumers (X, Y, and Z) to use CCS. The analysis of variance between the groups (ANOVA) highlights the generation differences that affect the decision to use the CCS by representatives of three generations. The identified generation features are of both theoretical significance, serving as a basis for further research, and practical value for business, mitigating the risks of introducing new CCS to the market, allowing for the needs of various generations of users.

About the Authors

N. G. Antonova
NRU Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Moscow



V. A. Rebiazina
NRU Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Moscow



E. O. Tunkevichus
NRU Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Moscow



P. A. Dvoryankin
NRU Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Moscow



References

1. Astashova Ju. V. Teorija pokolenij v marketinge // Vestnik Juzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Jekonomika i menedzhment. — 2014. — T. 8. — № 1.

2. Auditorija media v Rossii. Mediascope, 2019. URL: https://adindex.ru/specprojects/city-2019/presentations/272320_add_mediascope.pdf

3. Bulavkina L. V. Marketing dlja pokolenija Y. Kak zastavit’ ego pokupat’? // Marketingovye kommunikacii. — 2014. — № 4. — P. 246–255.

4. Gushhina I. Issledovanie Uber: zhiteli bol’shih gorodov uzhe ne hotjat poluchat’ prava. URL: https://rb.ru/opinion/kak-i-na-chem-po-gorodu/ (data obrashhenija: 17.01.2020).

5. Demidov A. Global’nye trendy i rossijskij potrebitel’ 2017 // Po rezul’tatam mezhdunarodnogo issledovanija «GfK Consumer Life». — M.: GfK Consumer Life, 2017.

6. Kalinina Ju. Pokolenie Y // Biznes-zhurnal. — 2010. — № 9 (174).

7. Kaconi V., Sheresheva M. Ju. Jekonomika sovmestnogo potreblenija v industrii gostepriimstva i turizma // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 6: Jekonomika. — 2019. — № 1. — S. 71–89.

8. Kurochkin A. S., Grishakova N. A. Jeffektivnoe upravlenie raznymi pokolenijami: chto nuzhno znat’ rukovoditelju? // Upravlenie razvitiem personala. — 2014. — T. 4. — S. 258–266.

9. Nastalo vremja sdelat’ potrebitelja centrom kompanii. Global’noe issledovanie potrebitel’skogo povedenija za 2019 god. PWC, 2019. URL: https://www.pwc.ru/ru/retail-consumer/publications/gcis-2019-ru.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0Ubu99kPT-XW-gRHR3MeqMsuzsGhSolL93W80oqZiNJZ3ovVNH_Cnu6_dE (data obrashhenija: 07.05.2020).

10. Pataraja G. Ohota na klienta. Kak brendy prevrashhajut pokupku v zahvatyvajushhee prikljuchenie // Forbes. — 2018. URL: http://www.forbes.ru/biznes/364169-ohota-na-klienta-kak-brendy-prevrashchayut-pokupku-v-zahvatyvayushchee-priklyuchenie (data obrashhenija: 12.01.2020).

11. Popov N. P. Rossijskie i amerikanskie pokolenija XX veka: otkuda prishli millenialy? // Monitoring obshhestvennogo mnenija: Jekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny. — 2018. — № 4 (146).

12. Savidov M. A. Karta cennostej millenialov: potrebitel’skoe povedenie i rabota // Reklama: teorija i praktika. — 2019. — № 1. — S. 42–57.

13. Tishhenko N. Ju., Tishhenko O. Je., Rebiazina V. A., Slobodchuk Ju. A. Faktory potrebitel’skogo povedenija v sfere jekonomiki sovmestnogo potreblenija v Rossii na primere kompanii Airbnb // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 6. Jekonomika. — 2019. — № 2. — S. 43–63.

14. Chem otlichajutsja pokolenija Y i Z — i o chem brendam s nimi razgovarivat’. Think With Google, 2019. URL: https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/intl/ru-ru/insights-trends/user-insights/z-y/ (data obrashhenija: 12.01.2020).

15. Chem rossijskie millenialy otlichajutsja ot zarubezhnyh. Deloitte, 2019. URL: https://www2.deloitte.com/ru/ru/pages/about-deloitte/deloitte-in-press/2019/chem-rossiyskie-millenialy-otlichautsya.html (data obrashhenija: 17.01.2020).

16. Sheringovye onlajn-servisy. ROCIT, 2017. URL: https://rocit.ru/uploads/0aefe83a9e6d70e06f938c7492996e59a036b53c.pdf?t=1501493510 (data obrashhenija: 12.01.2020).

17. Jekonomika sovmestnogo potreblenija v Rossii 2018. RAJeK, 2018. URL: https://raec.ru/upload/files/riw18-sharing-gubnitsyn-ru.pdf (data obrashhenija: 15.12.2019).

18. 2017 Cone Communications CSR Study. CONE, 2017. URL: https://www.conecomm.com/research-blog/2017-csr-study#download-the-research (дата обращения: 12.01.2020).

19. Ajzen I. et al. The theory of planned behavior // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. — 1991. — V. 50. — No. 2. — P. 179–211.

20. Algar R. Collaborative consumption, Leisure Report, 16–17 // Disponible en. — 2007.

21. Bardhi F., Eckhardt G. M. Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing // Journal of Consumer.

22. Belk R. You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online // Journal of Business Research. — 2014. — V. 67. — No. 8. — P. 1595–1600.

23. Beutell N. J., Wittig-Berman U. Work-family conflict and work-family synergy for generation X, baby boomers, and matures // Journal of Managerial Psychology. — 2008. — V. 23. — No. 5. — P. 507.

24. Botsman R., Rogers R. Whatʼs mine is yours. — NY: Collins, New York, 2011.

25. Bray J., Johns N., Kilburn D. An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption // Journal of Business Ethics. — 2011. — V. 98. — No. 4. — P. 597–608.

26. Brenton L. Social Media Marketing For a Millennial Audience. Online Marketing Institute. — 2017. URL: https://www.onlinemarketinginstitute.org/blog/2017/11/social-media-marketing-millennial-audience/ (дата обращения: 10.01.2020).

27. Bucher E., Fieseler C., Lutz C. What’s mine is yours (for a nominal fee) — Exploring the spectrum of utilitarian to altruistic motives for Internet-mediated sharing // Computers in Human Behavior. — 2016. — V. 62. — P. 316–326.

28. Buda G., Pethes B., Lehota J. Dominant Consumer Attitudes in the Sharing Economy — A Representative Study in Hungary // Resources. — 2020. — V. 9. — No. 1. — P. 1.

29. Činjarević M., Kožo A., Berberović D. Sharing is Caring, and Millennials Do Care: Collaborative Consumption through the Eyes of Internet Generation // South East European Journal of Economics and Business. — 2019. — V. 14. — No. 1. — P. 49–60.

30. Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology // MIS Quarterly. — 1989. — P. 319–340.

31. Deal J. J., Altman D. G., Rogelberg S. G. Millennials at work: What we know and what we need to do (if anything) // Journal of Business and Psychology. — 2010. — V. 25. — No. 2. — P. 191–199.

32. EC–European Commission et al. Exploratory study of consumer issues in online peer-to-peer platform markets // Final Report. — 2017.

33. Eisner S. P. Managing generation Y // SAM Advanced Management Journal. — 2005. — V. 70. — No. 4. — P. 4.

34. Felson M., Spaeth J. L. Community structure and collaborative consumption: A routine activity approach // American Behavioral Scientist. — 1978. — V. 21. — No. 4. — P. 614–624.

35. Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and Statistics, 1981.

36. Fourtane S. Generation Alpha: The Children of the Millenial // Interesting Engineering. UK. Saatavilla: https://interestingengineering.com/generation-alpha-the-children-ofthe-millennial. Viitattu. — 2018. — V. 8. — P. 2020 (дата обращения: 07.05.2020).

37. Francis T., Hoefel F. “True Gen”: Generation Z and its implications for companies. McKinsey & Company, 2018. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Consumer%20Packaged%20Goods/Our%20Insights/True%20Gen%20Generation%20Z%20and%20its%20implications%20for%20companies/Generation-Z-and-its-implication-for-companies.ashx (дата обращения: 12.01.2020).

38. Gen Z and Millennials leaving older shoppers and many retailers in their digital dust. Accenture, 2017. URL: https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/PDF-44/Accenture-Retail-Customer-Research-Executive-Summary-2017.pdf#zoom=50 (дата обращения: 12.01.2020).

39. Global trends and Russian consumer 2017. GFK, 2017. URL: https://www.gfk.com/fileadmin/user_upload/dyna_content/RU/Documents/Press_Releases/2017/Gfk-Global-Russian-Trends-Sep_2017_Report.pdf (дата обращения: 10.01.2020).

40. Godelnik R. Millennials and the sharing economy: Lessons from a ‘buy nothing new, share everything month’project // Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. — 2017. — V. 23. — P. 40–52.

41. Hamari J., Sjöklint M., Ukkonen A. The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption // Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. — 2016. — V. 67. — No. 9. — P. 2047–2059.

42. Hawlitschek F., Teubner T., Gimpel H. Understanding the sharing economy — Drivers and impediments for participation in peer-to-peer rental // 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). — IEEE, 2016. — P. 4782–4791.

43. Horton R. P. et al. Explaining intranet use with the technology acceptance model // Journal of Information Technology. — 2001. — V. 16. — No. 4. — P. 237–249.

44. Howe I., Howe N., Strauss W. 13th Gen: Abort, retry, ignore, fail? — Vintage, 1993.

45. Howe N., Strauss W. Millennials rising: The next great generation. — Vintage, 2000.

46. Howe N., Strauss W. The next 20 years: how customer and workforce attitudes will evolve // Harvard business review. — 2007. — V. 85. — No. 7–8. — P. 41–52, 191.

47. Kapil Y., Roy A. Critical evaluation of generation Z at workplaces // International Journal of Social Relevance & Concern. — 2014. — P. 2. — No. 1. — P. 10–14.

48. Lamberton C. P., Rose R. L. When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems // Journal of Marketing. — 2012. — V. 76. — No. 4. — P. 109–125.

49. Lancaster L. C., Stillman D. If I pass the baton, who will grab it? Creating bench strength in public management // Public Management-Lawrence Then Washington-. — 2005. — V. 87. — No. 8. — P. 8.

50. Mannheim K. 1993. «The Problem of Generations.» // From Karl Mannheim. — 1928. — P. 351–98.

51. Möhlmann M. Collaborative consumption: Determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again // Journal of Consumer Behaviour. — 2015. — V. 14. — No. 3. — P. 193–207.

52. Nagy Á., Kölcsey A. Generation Alpha: Marketing or Science // Acta Technologica Dubnicae. — 2017. — V. 7. — No. 1. — P. 107–115.

53. Ozkan M., Solmaz B. The changing face of the employees–generation Z and their perceptions of work (a study applied to university students) // Procedia Economics and Finance. — 2015. — V. 26. — P. 476–483.

54. Privrelová V. A Change in Buying Habits among Generation X and Y in the Age of the Sharing Economy, 2017.

55. Rainer T. S., Rainer J. The millennials // B&H Publishing Group, 2011. Research. — 2012. — V. 39. — No. 4. — P. 881–898.

56. Roos D., Hahn R. Understanding Collaborative Consumption to Make Collaboration-Based Organizations Meaningful // Academy of Management Proceedings. — Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management, 2016. — V. 2016. — No. 1. — P. 14072.

57. Schawbel D. The multi-generational job search study 2014 // Retrieved September. — 2014. — V. 16. — P. 2015.

58. Singh A. P., Dangmei J. Understanding the generation Z: the future workforce // South-Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. — 2016. — V. 3. — No. 3. — P. 1–5.

59. Stafford D. E., Griffis H. S. A review of millennial generation characteristics and military workforce implications // Center for Naval Analysis, http://www.cna.org/documentsD. — 2008. — V. 18211.

60. Strauss W., Howe N. An American prophecy, the fourth turning, what the cycles of history tell us about America’s next rendezvous with destiny, 1997.

61. Strauss W., Howe N. Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. — William Morrow & Co, 1991.

62. Stuenkel D. L., Cohen J., de la Cuesta K. The multigenerational nursing work force: essential differences in perception of work environment // JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration. — 2005. — V. 35. — No. 6. — P. 283–285.

63. Sustainable selections: How socially responsible companies are turning a profit. Nielsen. — 2015. URL: https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/article/2015/sustainable-selections-how-socially-responsible-companies-are-turning-a-profit/ (дата обращения: 10.01.2020).

64. Tandberg. Corporate environmental behavior and the impact on brand values, 2007.

65. The 2017 Deloitte Millennial Survey. Apprehensive millennials: Seeking stability and opportunities in an uncertain world // Deloitte, 2017. URL: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ie/Documents/Audit/ie-cons-millsurvey-2017.pdf (дата обращения 6.05.2020).

66. Venkatesh V., Thong J. Y. L., Xu X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology // MIS Quarterly. — 2012. — P. 157–178.

67. West M. What manufacturers need to know about generation Z // Manufacturing Engineering. — 2014. — V. 153. — No. 01. — P. 168–168.

68. Zalega T. Collaborative consumption in consumer behavior of Polish young people // Journal of Economics & Management. — 2018. — V. 33. — P. 136– 163.


Review

For citations:


Antonova N.G., Rebiazina V.A., Tunkevichus E.O., Dvoryankin P.A. Identifying generational differences in consumers’ decision to use shared services in Russia. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2020;(4):146-180. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202048

Views: 248


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0130-0105 (Print)