Basic determinants of social entrepreneurship: scientific discussion and legal framework
https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202039
Abstract
Social entrepreneurship is a developing economic and social phenomenon that needs scientific interpretation and solid legal framework. Russian and foreign researchers are actively discussing the content, boundaries, determinants of social entrepreneurship. The article examines modern approaches to the definition of social entrepreneurship, summarizes the typology of social enterprises, analyzes the characteristics of socially oriented non-profit organizations. The author gives a description of socially oriented non-profit organizations in the Russian Federation, points to the legitimacy of these organizations as a public service and recipients of government preferences and presents the reflections on the exclusion of government institutions from social entrepreneurship.
About the Author
M. L. Vasyunina
Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Araj Yu.N. Biznes-modeli v social’nom predprinimatel’stve: tipologiya i osobennosti formirovaniya: dissertaciya na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni kandidata ekonomicheskih nauk, 2015. — 213 s.
2. Vol’vach D. V., Kuznecov M. V., Spica A. M. Nekommercheskie organizacii za rubezhom: aspekty nalogooblozheniya // Nalogovaya politika i praktika. — 2015. — No 4 (148). — S. 68–74.
3. Moskovskaya A.A., Berendyaev A.A., Moskvina A.Yu. Mezhdu social’nym i ekonomicheskim blagom: konflikt proektov legitimacii social’nogo predprinimatel’stva v Rossii // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny. — 2017. — No 6. — S. 31–51.
4. Pleten’ A.S. Social’noe predprinimatel’stvo v sovremennoj Rossii: zakonodatel’noe regulirovanie i osnovnye napravleniya gosudarstvennoj podderzhki // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. —2016. — No 10 (71). — S. 94–101.
5. Alter K. Social enterprise typology. ― Virtue Ventures LLC. — 2007. — 124 р. URL: www.virtueventures.com/files/setypology.pdf (date view: 30.08.2018).
6. Bosche J. Eight Basic Principles for Nonprofit Entrepreneurs // Nonprofit World. —2001. —Vol. 10. — No. 4 — Р.15–18.
7. Braunerhjelm P., Hamilton S. Social entrepreneurship — a survey of current research // Swedish Entrepreneurship Forum, Working Papers, 2012.
8. Dees J. G. The meaning of social entrepreneurship // Duke University, the Fuqua School of Business, 2001. URL: http://www.caseatduke.org/documents/dees_sedef.pdf/ (date view: 10.10.2018).
9. Dennis R. Young Social Enterprise in the United States: Alternate Identities and Forms // The EMES Conference, The Social Enterprise: A Comparative Perspective Trento, Italy December 13–15, 2001.
10. Fowler A. NGDOs as a Moment in History: Beyond Aid to Social Entrepreneurship or CivicInnovation // Third World Quarterly. — 2000. — Vol. 4. — P. 637–654.
11. Giulia G., Borzaga C. Social enterprise. An international overview of its conceptual evolution and legal implementation // Social Enterprise Journal. — 2009. — Vol. 5. — Issue 3. — P. 210–228.
12. Haugh H. Community-Led Social Venture Creation» // Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice.—2007. — Vol. 31. — No. 2. — P. 161–182.
13. Hibbert S., Hogg G., Quinn T. Consumer Response to Social Entrepreneurship: The Case of the Big Issue in Scotland // International Journal of Non-profit & Voluntary Sector Marketing. —2002. — Vol. 7. — No. 3. — P. 288–301.
14. Kerlin J.A. Social entreprise in the United States and Europe: understanding and learning from the differences // International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University. —2006. —Vol. 17. — P. 247–263.
15. Lasprogata G., Cotton M. Contemplating Enterprise: The Business and Legal Challenges of Social Entrepreneurship // American Business Law Journal. — 2003. — Vol. 41. — No. 1. — P. 67–113.
16. Mair J., Battilana J., Cardenas J. Organizing for society: a typology of social entreprneuring // Journal of Business Ethic. —2012. — Vol. 111. — P. 353–373.
17. Mair J., Mart I. Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight // Journal of World Business. — 2006.— Vol. 41. — P. 36–44. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222436408_Social_Entrepreneurship_Research_A_Source_of_Explanation_Prediction_and_Delight (date view: 06.09.2018).
18. Pache A.-C., Santos F. Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics // Academy of Management Journal. — 2013. — Vol. 56. — P. 972–1001.
19. Policy Brief on Social Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurial Activities in Europe. — OECD, 2013.
20. Popoviciu I., Popoviciu S. Social entrepreneurship, social enterprise and the principles of a community of practice // Revista de cercetare interventie social. — 2011. — Vol. 33. — P. 44–55.
21. Santos F. A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship // Faculty and Research Working Paper. — Social Innovation Centre, 2009.— 54 p.
22. Social Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation. — OECD, 2010.
23. Social Innovation for Public Service Excellence. — Global Centre for Public Service Excellence, 2014.
24. Swanson L. A., Zhang D. D. Social Entrepreneurship Zone // Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 2010. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221928380_Social_Entrepreneurship (date view: 28.08.2018).
25. Weerawardena J., Sullivan Mort G. Learning, Innovation and Competitive Advantage in Not-for-Profit Aged Care Marketing: A Conceptual Model and Research Propositions // Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing. —Vol. 9. — No. 3. — P. 54.
26. Zhara S., Gedajlovic E., Neubaum D., Shulman J. Typology of Entrepreneurs: Motives, Search Processes and Ethical Dilemmas // Journal of Business Venturing.— 2009. —Vol. 24. — No. 5. — P. 519–532.
27. Zahra S., Rawhouser H., Bhawe N., Neubaum D., Hayton J. Globalization of social entrepreneurship opportunities // Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.— 2008.— Vol. 2. — P. 117–131.
Review
For citations:
Vasyunina M.L. Basic determinants of social entrepreneurship: scientific discussion and legal framework. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2020;(3):182-199. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202039
Views:
301
Email this article 