Choosing a management system in a construction organization
https://doi.org/10.38050/013001052020311
Abstract
The subject of the research is management systems used in construction organizations and methods of decision support while choosing the system of management. The purpose of the work is to offer a method of decision support for managing a construction organization when choosing a transition to a process management approach or a project-oriented management approach. The article emphasizes the relevance of improving the quality of enterprise management in construction industry, and provides an overview of domestic and foreign literature on improving management methods. The study substantiates the need for a method to support decision-making while shifting to a new management system. The authors propose a method based on the evaluation criteria obtained through a survey of the company’s management. The proposed method helps managers and founders to make a decision concerning the choice of management system and warns against erroneous decisions and losses associated with the introduction of a management system “inefficient” for the construction company.
About the Authors
N. K. Kemaykin
RENEPA
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dzerzhinsk
A. E. Markov
LLC “Center SBK Dzerzhinsk”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dzerzhinsk
References
1. Buzyrev V.V., Fedoseev I.V., Martynov V.F. Menedzhment v stroitel'stve. — M.: KNORUS, 2017. — 320 s.
2. Davletshin R.I. Marcinkovskaja A.V. Jekonomicheskaja jeffektivnost' upravlenija biznes-processami na predprijatii transportnogo stroitel'stva // Transportnoe stroitel'stvo. — 2015. — No 10, 11. — S. 17–19, 5–8.
3. Davletshin R.I. Formirovanie sistemy upravlenija predprijatija transportnogo stroitel'stva na baze processnogo podhoda: dissertacija na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni kandidata jekonomicheskih nauk / FGBOU VPO «Moskovskij gosudarstvennyj universitet putej soobshhenija Imperatora Nikolaja II». — M., 2017.
4. Knjaz'kina E. V., Aitova M. V., Kislova Ju. E. Processnyj podhod kak faktor povyshenija kachestva rabot // Innovacionnye strategii razvitija jekonomiki i upravlenija: sbornik statej. Samarskij gosudarstvennyj arhitekturno-stroitel'nyj universitet. — Samara, 2015. — S. 94–99.
5. Kosteckij D.A. Analiz processa upravlenija stroitel'nymi organizacijami na sovremennom jetape // Molodoj uchenyj. — 2016. — No 1. — S. 385–387. URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/105/24717 (data obrashhenija: 30.01.2019).
6. Makarova L.V., Tarasov R.V., Malebnova S.G. Optimizacija biznes-processov v ramkah sozdanija sistem menedzhmenta kachestva // Obrazovanie i nauka v sovremennom mire. Innovacii. — 2017. — No 4 (11). — S. 123–134.
7. Makarova L. V., Tarasov R. V., Medvedkova E. V. Processnyj podhod pri razrabotke processov sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva na predprijatijah stroitel'noj industrii // Sovremennye nauchnye issledovanija i innovacii. — 2014. — No 3 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2014/03/32204 (data obrashhenija: 30.01.2019).
8. Petrachenko N.N., Evseeva S.A., Levshina V.V. Vnedrenie processnogo podhoda v stroitel'stve kak instrument organizacionnogo obnovlenija // Jekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo. — 2017. — No 7 (84). — S. 675–679.
9. Rogov A.A., Burkov V.I., Proshin V.S. Jekspertnyj i processnyj podhod v oblasti transportnogo stroitel'stva // Kachestvo. Innovacii. Obrazovanie. — 2016. — No 8–10 (135–137). — S. 188–190.
10. Seljutina L.G., Golubev A.N., Fomina N.Ju. Aktual'nye aspekty problemy sovershenstvovanija sistemy upravlenija stroitel'nymi predprijatijami // Aktual'nye problemy sovremennoj nauki. — 2017. — No 1 (92). — S. 23–24.
11. Spiridonov Je.S., Gordov A. N. Proektno-orientirovannoe upravlenie v stroitel'stve i putevom hozjajstve // Put' i putevoe hozjajstvo. — 2011. — No 6. — S. 17–19.
12. Folomeev E.V. Razrabotka modeli processnogo upravlenija malym stroitel’nym predprijatiem // MIR (Modernizacija. Innovacii. Razvitie). — 2012. — No 10. — S. 35–37.
13. Folomeev E. V. Rezul'taty vnedrenija processnogo podhoda k upravleniju sub#ektami malogo predprinimatel'stva (na primere logisticheskoj sluzhby stroitel'nogo predprijatija) // MIR (Modernizacija. Innovacii. Razvitie). — 2013. — No 13. — S. 120–124.
14. Hripko E.G., Sidorov G.A. Problematika primenenija processnogo metoda upravlenija v stroitel'stve // Jekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo. — 2017. — No 2–1 (79–1). — S. 1094–1097.
15. Shherbina G. F. Teorija i praktika vnedrenija processnogo podhoda v dejatel'nost' stroitel'nogo holdinga // Voprosy jekonomiki i prava. — 2010. — No 30. — S. 174– 179. URL: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/2011/06/28/1267383821/Sherbina%20174-179.pdf (data obrashhenija: 30.01.2019).
16. Hoła B., Sawicki M., Skibniewski M. An IT model of a Knowledge Map which supports management in small and medium-sized companies using selected Polish construction enterprises as an example // Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. — 2015. — No 8. — Vol. 21. — P. 1014–1026. URL: https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2015.1030865 (дата обращения: 01.01.2019).
17. Keng T.C., Kamil S.Z. Implementation of ISO quality management system in construction companies of Malaysia. // Journal of Technology Management and Business. — 2016. — No 1.— Vol. 3.— P. 2–23. URL: http://penerbit.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/jtmb/article/view/1135/867 (дата обращения: 01.01.2019).
18. Melo R.M., Medeiros D.D., Almeida A.T. A multicriteria model for ranking of improvement approaches in construction companies based on the PROMETHÉE II method // SciELOBrasil. — 2015. — No 1. — Vol. 25. — p. 2–23. URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0103-65132015000100069&script=sci_arttext&tlng=es (дата обращения: 30.01.2019).
19. Willarb D., Trigunarsyah B., Coffey V. Organisational culture and quality management system implementation in Indonesian construction companies // Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. — 2016. — Vol. 23. — Issue: 2. — P. 114–133. URL: https://emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/ECAM-02-2015-0026 (дата обращения: 30.01.2019).
Review
For citations:
Kemaykin N.K., Markov A.E. Choosing a management system in a construction organization. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2020;(3):220-236. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/013001052020311
Views:
318
Email this article 