DETERMINANTS OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN RUSSIA: THE ROLE OF INDIVIDUAL TIME PREFERENCES

Social policy includes such components as health care, education, physical activity, and sports, where the state acts not only as a financier, but also as a provider of services. Studying the determinants of physical activity makes it possible to identify the set of social policy measures aimed at the formation of a healthy lifestyle. Among the determinants of physical activity, there are socioeconomic characteristics of an individual, such as age, gender, health status, income level, marital and employment status. There is also an individual trend for a healthy lifestyle, or to refuse it, which was formed because of the influence of the environment, education, and personal beliefs. The purpose of this article is to examine the influence of individual time preferences on physical activity. Physical activity is monitored using physical exercises and walking indicators. The proxy for individual time preferences is individual discount rate. This rate is determined using a hypothetical money experiment. Individuals with a higher individual discount rate demonstrate impatience in obtaining utility from consumption. They are not ready to take health-improving actions. The study is carried out on the data of a special survey of the Levada Center dedicated to a healthy lifestyle of the Russian population in 2017. The main hypothesis is tested by estimating the system of binary equations. Individuals with higher individual discount rate are less likely to engage in physical exercises for health purposes. The findings provide additional information for the development of public policy measures aimed at creating healthy lifestyle.

1. Zasimova, L., & Loktev, D. (2016). Sports for the rich? (Empirical investigation of participation in sport in Russia) [Zanyatiya sportom — udel bogatykh? (Empiricheskiy analiz zanyatiy sportom v Rossii)]. Higher School of Economics Economic Journal [Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki] 20 (3), 471–499.

2. Portal of Government Programs of the Russian Federation. Development of physical activity and sports [Razvitie fi zicheskoj kul`tury` i sporta] (2021). https://programs.gov.ru/Portal/program/13/passport.

3. Ahangar, A. A., Khoshmanzar, H., Heidari, B., Bijani, A., Hosseini, R., Gholinia, H, Saadat, P., & Babaei, M. (2019). Prevalence and the Determinants of Physical Activity in an Elderly Cohort of 60 years and more. A Cross-Sectional Case-Control Study. Ageing International, 44, 399–410.

4. Bernardelli, L. V., Pereira, C., & Kortt, M. A. (2020). The economic and social determinants of participation in physical activity in Brazil. International Review of Applied Economics, 34, 2, 252–266.

5. Bradford, W. D., Zoller, J., & Silvestri, G. A. (2010). Estimating the Effect of Individual Time Preferences on the Use of Disease Screening. Southern Economic Journal, 76 (4), 1005–1031.

6. Cheah, Y. K., Azahadi, M., Phang, S. N., & Hazilah, N. (2017). The Income and Demographic Determinants of Physical Activity Intensity: Evidence from a Developing Country. Margin—The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 11 (3), 348–364.

7. Fuchs, V. R. (1982). Time preference and health: An exploratory study / In V. R. Fuchs (Ed.), Economic Aspects of Health. University of Chicago Press for the NBER, 93–120.

8. Grignon, M. (2009). An empirical investigation of heterogeneity in time preferences and smoking behaviors. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 739–751.

9. Grossman, M. (1972). The Demand for Health: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. Columbia University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.

10. Harrison, G. W, Lau, M. I, & Williams, M. B. (2002). Estimating individual discount rates in Denmark: A Field Experiment. The American Economic Review, 92 (5), 1606–1617.

11. Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., & Rutström, E. (2009). Individual Discount Rates and Smoking: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Denmark. Journal of Health Economics, 29, 708–717.

12. Hunter, R. F., Tang, J., Hutchinson, G., Chilton, S., & Holmes, D., & Kee, F. (2018). Association between time preference, present-bias and physical activity: implications for designing behavior change interventions. BMC Public Health, 18, 1388–1400.

13. Karunanayake, A. L., Senaratne, C. D., & Stathi, A. (2020). A descriptive cross sectional study comparing barriers and determinants of physical activity of Sri Lankan middle aged and older adults. PLoS ONE, 15(5): e0232956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232956

14. Kleinke, F., Penndorf, P., Ulbricht, S., Dörr, M., Hoffmann, W., & Berg, N. (2020). Levels of and determinants for physical activity and physical inactivity in a group of healthy elderly people in Germany: Baseline results of the MOVING-study. PLoS ONE, 15(8): e0237495. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237495

15. Komlos, J., Smith, P. K., & Bogin, B. (2004). Obesity and the rate of time preference: is there a connection? J. biosoc. Sci., 36, 209–219.

16. Kosteas, V. D. (2015). Physical activity and time preference. International Journal of Health Economics and Management, 15 (4), 361–386.

17. Kossova, T., Kossova, E., & Sheluntcova, M. (2017). Alcohol consumption and individual time preferences of Russians. International Review of Economics, 64 (1), 47–85.

18. Kossova, T., Kossova, E., & Sheluntcova, M. (2018). Anti-smoking policy in Russia: Relevant factors and program planning. Evaluation and Program Planning, 69, 43–52.

19. Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A Note on Measurement of Utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4 (2), 155–161.

20. Smith, P. K., Bogin, B., & Bishai, D. (2005). Are time preference and body mass index associated? Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Economics and Human Biology, 3, 259–270.

21. Tate, L. M., Tsai, P-F., Landes, R. D., Rettiganti, M., & Lefler, L. L. (2015). Temporal discounting rates and their relation to exercise behavior in older adults. Physiology & Behavior, 152, 295–299.

22. Zasimova, L. (2020). Sports facilities’ location and participation in sports among working adults. European Sport Management Quarterly (in press), 1–21. DOI:10.1080/16184742.2020.1828968