Preview

Moscow University Economics Bulletin

Advanced search

Corporate financial responsibility and company financial performance: evidence from Russia

https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202237

Abstract

The paper analyses two alternative theoretical interpretations the nature of Corporate Environmental Responsibility (CER)-Financial Performance (FP) interconnections based on the concept, that the implementation of CER measures increases the company financial efficiency, or the alternative theory the CER strategy development can only be applicable for stable companies with sufficient financial resources. The recent empirical literature shows many inconsistencies in each of the theoretical explanations the effective environmental and company financial policy formation. There are no Russian and foreign studies explaining the environmental responsibility and financial efficiency interconnection for Russian companies. It determines the purpose of this research and the novelty of the obtained research results. We use the least squares method in order to argue that financial efficiency is a significant driver for environmental responsibility of Russian companies. We also argue that the influence of financial efficiency on environmental responsibility varies according to the ownership structure and the foreign and state participation in the company.

About the Authors

A. S. Makarov
HSE University
Russian Federation

Makarov Aleksey S. — PhD (Economic Sciences), Professor, Head of Financial Management Department

Nizhny Novgorod



E. V. Ryabova
HSE University
Russian Federation

Ryabova Elena V. — PhD (Economic Sciences), Associate Professor of Financial Management Department 

Nizhny Novgorod

 



D. D. Feduleeva
HSE University; JSC KPMG
Russian Federation

Feduleeva Darya D. — Master of Finance, Executive of Deal Advisory JSC KPMG

Nizhny Novgorod



References

1. Ankudinov, A. B. & Badykova, I. R. (2020). Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between the Costs of Corporate Social Responsibility Policy Implementation and Russian Companies’ Financial Performance. The Manager, 11 (2), 16–26. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-2-2

2. Adnan, S. M., Hay, D. & van Staden, C. J. (2018). The infl uence of culture and corporate governance on corporate social responsibility disclosure: A cross country analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 820–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.057

3. Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B. & Hatfi eld, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profi tability. Academy of Management Journal, 28 (2), 446–463.

4. Bansal, P. & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159562

5. Benitez-Amado, J., Llorens-Montes, F. J. & Fernandez-Perez, V. (2015). IT impact on talent management and operational environmental sustainability. Information Technology and Management, 16 (3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-015-0226-4

6. Brammer, S. & Pavelin, S. (2008). Factors infl uencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy & the Environment, 17 (2), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.506

7. Cai, L. & He, C. (2014). Corporate environmental responsibility and equity prices. Journal of Business Ethics, 125 (4), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1935-4

8. Chen, J., Zhang, F., Liu, L., & Zhu, L. (2019). Does environmental responsibility matter in cross-sector partnership formation? A legitimacy perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 231, 612–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.099

9. Cho, C. H. & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32 (7, 8), 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009

10. Choi, J. S., Kwak, Y. M., & Choe, C. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and corporate fi nancial performance: Evidence from Korea. Australian journal of management, 35 (3), 291– 311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896210384681

11. Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Van Velthoven, B. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European accounting review, 14 (1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818042000339617

12. Daily, B. F. & Huang, S. (2001). Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21 (12), 1539–1552. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110410892

13. Danso, A., Adomako, S., Lartey, T., Amankwah-Amoah, J., & Owusu-Yirenkyi, D. (2020). Stakeholder integration, environmental sustainability orientation and fi nancial performance. Journal of business research, 119, 652–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.038

14. Deng, X., & Li, L. (2020). Promoting or Inhibiting? The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Corporate Financial Performance — An Empirical Analysis Based on China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (11), 3828. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113828

15. Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profi ts. Corporate ethics and corporate governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 173–178.

16. Graafl and, J., & Noorderhaven, N. (2018). National culture and environmental responsibility research revisited. International Business Review, 27 (5), 958–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.02.006

17. Kivleniece, I., & Quelin, B. V. (2012). Creating and capturing value in public-private ties: a private actor’s perspective. Academy of Management Review, 37 (2), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0004

18. Kolstad, C. D. (1996). Learning and stock eff ects in environmental regulation: the case of greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of environmental economics and management, 31 (1), 1–18. doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0028

19. Li, D., Cao, C., Zhang, L., Chen, X., Ren, S., & Zhao, Y. (2017). Eff ects of corporate environmental responsibility on fi nancial performance: The moderating role of government regulation and organizational slack. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 1323–1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.129

20. Li, S., Chu, S., & Shen, C. (2014). Local government competition, environmental regulation and regional ecological effi ciency. J. World Econ., 37 (04), 88–110.

21. Liu, X., & Anbumozhi, V. (2009). Determinant factors of corporate environmental information disclosure: an empirical study of Chinese listed companies. Journal of cleaner production, 17 (6), 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.10.001

22. Liu, Y., Xi, B., & Wang, G. (2021). The impact of corporate environmental responsibility on fi nancial performance — Based on Chinese listed companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28 (7), 7840–7853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11069-4

23. Marquis, C., & Qian, C. (2014). Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organization science, 25 (1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0837

24. Montabon, F., Sroufe, R., & Narasimhan, R. (2007). An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and fi rm performance. Journal of operations management, 25 (5), 998–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.10.003

25. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and fi nancial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24 (3), 403–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910

26. Palmer, K., Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: the benefi t-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of economic perspectives, 9 (4), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.119

27. Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2016). Social responsibility and fi nancial performance: The role of good corporate governance. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19 (2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2015.08.001

28. Salomon, R. M. & Barnett, M. L. (2006). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and fi nancial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27 (11), 1101–1122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.557

29. Selmier II, W. T., Newenham-Kahindi, A., & Oh, C. H. (2015). Understanding the words of relationships: Language as an essential tool to manage CSR in communities of place. Journal of International Business Studies, 46 (2), 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.58

30. Sen, S. & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of management Research, 38 (2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838

31. Shabbir, M. S., & Wisdom, O. (2020). The relationship between corporate social responsibility, environmental investments and fi nancial performance: Evidence from manufacturing companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10217-0

32. Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic management Journal, 29 (6), 569–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.678

33. Song, H., Zhao, C., & Zeng, J. (2017). Can Environmental Management Improve Financial Performance: An Empirical Study of A — shares Listed Companies in China. Journal of cleaner production, 141, 1051–1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.105

34. Wang, Q., Dou, J., & Jia, S. (2016) A Meta — Analytic Review of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance: The Moderating Eff ect of Contextual Factors. Business & Sosiety, 55 (8), 1083–1121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315584317

35. Yang, R., Wong, C. W., & Miao, X. (2021). Analysis of the Trend in the Knowledge of Environmental Responsibility Research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123402

36. Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs (2019, May 28). Non-Financial Reporting in Russia and the World: Sustainable Development Goals in Focus — 2019. https://www.rspp.ru/events/news/rspp-predstavlyaet-novyy-analiticheskiy-obzor-nefinansovayaotchetnost-v-rossii-i-mire-tseli-ustoych/?sphrase_id=215328 (date of address: 20.07.2021).


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Makarov A.S., Ryabova E.V., Feduleeva D.D. Corporate financial responsibility and company financial performance: evidence from Russia. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2022;(3):121-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202237

Views: 524


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0130-0105 (Print)