Quantitative assessment of occupational risk based on determining the costs of ensuring life and health of employees
https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-5-7
Abstract
Implementing a quantitative occupational risk assessment is legislated as an employer’s responsibility nowadays. Yet, there is no unified approach to risk assessment.
Employers make decision on a certain methodological approach depending on current industrial processes and existing occupational health and management system on their own. The study aims to develop a unified methodological approach to quantitative occupational risk assessment. The research methodology is based on the provisions of regulatory documents in occupational health and safety, scientific publications on occupational risk assessment. The research method involves analyzing normative and methodological literature on occupational risk management and the statistical data on occupational safety expenditures of companies. The article presents a comparison of the main available approaches used in companies to implement a quantitative occupational risk assessment. The results show there is no possibility to justify the costs of risk response activities in a vast majority of methods. The authors propose a methodological approach to occupational risk assessment based on determining the costs of ensuring life and health of employees. This approach allows to develop and substantiate activities on occupational risk reduction and the improvement of industrial safety level in a company as well as to assess the effect expected of the implementation of corrective actions. The actual vector of scientific research on the subject is to create and implement information systems for occupational risk management and decision-making support based on the developed approach in companies
About the Authors
A. A. KomzolovRussian Federation
Moscow
T. V. Kirichenko
Russian Federation
Moscow
V. D. Barkhatov
Russian Federation
Moscow
M. V. Manezheva
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. EcoStandard.journal. (2020, August 18). The EcoStandard group methodology of risk assessment and management. Retrived July 11, 2022, from https://journal.ecostandardgroup.ru/opinion/metodika-otsenki-i-upravleniya-riskami-ecostandard-group/
2. Fainburg, G. Z., & Prosvirnin, D. G. (2019). The automation and digitalization problems of the occupational risk assessment procedures. Occupational Safety and Health, 2 4–11
3. Federal State Statistics Service. (2022). Working conditions. Retrived July 7, 2022, from https://rosstat.gov.ru/working_conditions
4. Fedorets, А. G. (2011). Methodologists to be required? The methodological approaches to industrial risks assessment based on the analysis of regulations implementing. Occupational Safety and Health, 1, 13–17
5. Fedorovitch, G. V. (2017). The dose-effect relationship for heavy work. Risk-oriented approach, Occupational Safety and Health, 3, 52–61
6. FSI Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health. (2003). Guidelines on occupational risk assessment for workers' health. Organizational and methodological aspects, principles and criteria. Retrived July 11, 2022, from http://www.consultant.ru/
7. Glebova, E. V., Retinskaya, I. V., Volokhina, A. T., & Pogodaeva, A. E. (2017). Improvement of risk management methods on the example of the Usian gas processing factory LLC «LUKOIL Komi». Educational resources and technologies 2(19), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.21777/2500-2112-2017-2-64-71
8. Khrupachyov, A. G., Hadartsev, A. A., Kamenev, L. I., Panova, I. V., & Sedova, O. A. (2010). The methodological conception of occupational risk and its quantitative assessment. Hazards and safety, 35(92), 69–80
9. Klimova, I. V. (2019). Application of methods of fuzzy modeling for solving problems of technosphere safety. Gornyi informatsionno-analiticheskii byulleten' (nauchno-tekhnicheskii zhurnal), S7 87–98
10. Klin Institute of Occupational Safety and Conditions. (2008). Development of the methodology of working conditions integral assessment in terms of integrated effect of the workplace factors of different hazard classes (hygienic assessment of working conditions, workplace safety assessment, PPE provision assessment). Retrived July 11, 2022, from https://www.kiout.ru/
11. Komzolov, A. A., Kirichenko, T. V., Barkhatov, V. D. & Manezheva, M. V. (2022). The analysis of methodological approaches to occupational risk assessment. Moscow University Economic Bulletin, (2) 110–141. https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105202226
12. Kuleshov, V. V., Kovalkovskaya, N. O., Bakiko, E. V., & Serdyuk, V. S. (2021). Quantitative assessment of the human factor influence on the occupational risk level. estnik Nauchnogo tsentra po bezopasnosti rabot v ugolnoy promyshlennosti, 2, 47–54
13. Lesnykh, V. V., Kashirin, А. B., Suvorova, О. S., & Ivenkov, S. G. (2017). The analysis of modern approaches to the assessment of occupational risk in the gas industry. Gas industry, 57(9), 128–136
14. Meshkov, N. A., & Rakhmanin, Yu. A. (2021). Methodology for environmental health assessment of adaptive response to professional activity factors as part of health risk assessment. Gigiena i Sanitariya, 4, 387–395. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-4-387-395
15. Min’ko, V. М. (2002). Mathematical modeling in occupational health and safety management Kaliningrad: Yantarnyj skaz
16. Occupational Health and Safety Institute. (2021). The explanatory note to OHSI method for occupational risk assessment. Retrived July 8, 2022, from https://ohsi.ru/upload/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D1%8F%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D%8C%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F%20%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%20%D0%BA%20%D0%9C%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%83%20%D0%98%D0%91%D0%A2_2021.pdf?ysclid=l3k0ns0c7uclid=l3k0ns0c7u
17. Recommendations of the public joint-stock company Gazprom. (2022). The Unified System of Industrial Safety Management. The quantitative occupational risk assessment methodology. (R Gazprom 18000.4-025-2022). Retrived March 27, 2022, from http://www.consultant.ru/
18. Russian National Standard. (2019). Risk management. Risk assessment technologies (GOST R 58771-2019). Retrived July 11, 2022, from http://www.consultant.ru/
19. Russian National Standard. (2009). Occupational safety standards system. Occupational safety and health management systems. Hazard and risks identification and estimation of risks (GOST R 12.0.010-2009). Retrived July 11, 2022, from http://www.consultant.ru/
20. Sevast'yanov, B. V. (2008). Methods of quantitative assessments in the management of industrial and occupational hazards. Safety in technosphere, 1, 13–18
21. Sidorov, A. I., Bogdanov, A. V., Medvedeva Yu. V., & Filippov A. N. Occupational risk determination using the integral assessment of working conditions methodology (2021). Occupational Safety in Industry 3, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.24000/0409-2961-2021-3-88-93
22. Starovoitov, I. G., Biruk, V. А., & Bulauka, Yu. А. (2018). Risk assessment methods in the management system of labor protection. Vestnik Universiteta grazhdanskoj zashchity MChS Belarusi, 1, 5–17
23. State Standard. (2018). Occupational safety standards system. Нealth management systems. Risk assessment methods to ensure the safety of work. (GOST R 12.0.230.5-2018). Retrived July 11, 2022, from http://www.consultant.ru/
24. The Decree of the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of the Russian Federation (2012, August 1) «On approval of the Methodology for calculating discounts and surcharges for the insurance rate concerning compulsory social insurance against industrial accidents and industrial diseases» from 01.08.2012, the current wording (No. 39н)
25. The Decree of the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of the Russian Federation (2021, December 28) «On approval of the guidance on the choice of methods for occupational risk assessment and reduction in risk levels» from 28.12.2021 (No. 796).
26. The Decree of the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of the Russian Federation (2022, January 31) «On approval of the guidance on the classification, detection, recognition and description of hazards» from 31.01.2022 (No. 36)
27. The Labour Code of the Russian Federation. (2001, December 30) of 30.12.2001. Passed by the Parliament from 21.12.2001, the current wording (No. 197-FZ).
28. Zaitseva, N. V., Shur, P. Z., Alekseev, V. B., Savochkina, A. A., Savochkin, A. I., & Khrushcheva, E. V. (2020). Methodical approaches to assessing categories of occupational risk predetermined by various health disorders among workers related to occupational and labor process factors. Health Risk Analysis, 4 23–30. https://doi.org/10.21668/health. risk/2020.4.03
29. Zonova, N. O., Serdyuk, V. S., & Fomin, A. I. (2022). Development of a digital tool for automation of professional risk assessment processes taking into account the influence of the human factor. Vestnik Nauchnogo tsentra po bezopasnosti rabot v ugolnoy promyshlennosti 2, 45–59
Supplementary files
![]() |
1. Сведения об авторах | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
Download
(17KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
Review
For citations:
Komzolov A.A., Kirichenko T.V., Barkhatov V.D., Manezheva M.V. Quantitative assessment of occupational risk based on determining the costs of ensuring life and health of employees. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2023;(5):134-161. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-5-7