Preview

Moscow University Economics Bulletin

Advanced search

Natural Interest Rate: Sraff a vs. Hayek Debates

https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105201931

Abstract

This article deal with the discussion between F. Hayek and P. Sraffa in the 1930s. This piece of the history of economic thought is not presented in the Russian-speaking literature. The main method is a content analysis. The directions of criticism Hayek’s business cycle theory by Sraffa and the response towards is analyzed in the paper. The author compared the opponents’ approaches to the essence of the equilibrium, to the savings-investments equality, to the possibility to lose capital as a result of malinvestments, to the role of expectations, and to the natural rate of interest. A version was offered for explaining the ineffectiveness of Hayek's answer to the question on the multiplicity of natural interest rates and the reasons why the barter economy has been perceived as theoretical basis of the Hayekian analysis. It is the inaccurate wording of the natural interest rate and the representation the theory within the framework of the equilibrium paradigm. The findings of the research may be applied to analyze the impact of interest rate regulation on the economic.

About the Author

A. V. Kavaliou
Белоруский национальный технический университет; Европейский гуманитарный университет
Belarus


References

1. Kavaliou A. V. Debaty Keynes-Hayek: pereosmyslenie v svete sovremennoj makroekonomiki // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Serija Ekonomika. — 2018 (forthcoming).

2. Hayek F. A. [1931]. Ceny i proizvodstvo. — Chelyabinsk: Sotsium, 2008.

3. Khudokormov A. G. Teorii deneg: ocherki teorii ekonomiko-teoreticheskoj mysli (materialy k lekcijam i seminaram) // Rossijskij ekonomicheskij zhurnal. — 2017. — № 5. — S. 57–83.

4. Caballero R. J. Macroeconomics After the Crisis: Time to Deal with the Pretense-of-Knowledge Syndrome // Journal of Economic Perspectives. — 2010. — Vol. 24. — Iss. 4. — P. 85–102.

5. Ferlito C. Ludwig M. Lachmann Against the Cambridge School // Journal of Reviews on Global Economics. — 2015. — No 4. — P. 251–267.

6. Glasner D., Zimmerman P. R. The Sraffa-Hayek Debate on the Natural Rate of Interest (July 7, 2014) // SSRN working paper series. URL: http://ssrn.com/ abstract=2221695 (дата обращения: 21.08.2018)

7. Hayek F. A. [1928]. The intertemporal equilibrium system of prices and the movements of the monetary value / In F. A. Hayek. Money, Capital, and Fluctuations. Early Essays. — London, Melbourne, and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984.

8. Hayek F. A. [1929]. Geldtheorie und Konjunkturtheorie. — Vienna: Julius Springer Verlag, 1929.

9. Hayek F. A. [1931a]. Reflections on the Pure Theory of Money of Mr. J. M. Keynes // Economica. — 1931. — Vol. 11 (33). — P. 270–295.

10. Hayek F. A. [1931b]. A Rejoinder to Mr. Keynes // Economica. — 1931. — Vol. 11 (33). — P. 398–403.

11. Hayek F. A. [1931c]. Prices and Production. — London: G. Routledge and Sons, 1931.

12. Hayek F. A. [1932a]. Reflections on the Pure Theory of Money of Mr.J. M. Keynes (continued) // Economica. 1932. — Vol. 12 (35). — P. 22–44.

13. Hayek F. A. [1932b]. Money and Capital: A Reply to Mr. Sraffa // Economic Journal. — Vol. 42 (2). — P. 237–249.

14. Hayek F. A. [1933]. Monetary Theory and Trade Cycle. — New York, Augustus M. Kelley, 1933 [reprinted 1966].

15. Keynes J. M. [1930]. A Treatise on Money. — London: Macmillan, 1930.

16. Keynes J. M. [1931]. The Pure Theory of Money. A Reply to Dr. Hayek // Economica. — Vol. 11(34). — P. 387–397.

17. Kurz H. D. The Hayek-Keynes-Sraffa Controversy Reconsidered / In H. D. Kurz and N. Salvadori (eds.) The Legacy of Piero Sraffa. — Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003. — P. 257–447.

18. Kurz H. D. Capital Theory, Crises, and Business Cycles: The Triangular Debate between Hayek, Keynes, and Sraffa // Journal of Reviews on Global Economics. — 2015. — No. 4. — P. 186–191.

19. Lachmann L. M. Austrian Economics under fire: the Hayek-Sraffa Duel in Retrospect / In W. Grassl and B. Smith (eds.) Austrian Economics: Historical and Philosophical Background. — London: Croom Helm, 1986. — P. 225–242.

20. Naldi N. Sraffa and Keynes on the Concept of Commodity Rates of Interest // Contributions to Political Economy. — 2015. — Vol. 34. — Iss. 1. — P. 17–30.

21. Sanz Bas D. Hayek’s Critique of The General Theory: a New View of the Debate between Hayek and Keynes // Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. — 2011. — Vol. 14 (3). — P. 288–310.

22. Shackle G. L. S. The Years of High Theory: invention and tradition in economic thought, 1926–1939. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.

23. Snowdon B., Vane H. R., Wynarczyk P. A Modern Guide to Macroeconomics: An Introduction to Competing Schools of Thought. — Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2005.

24. Sraffa P. [1932a]. Dr. Hayek on Money and Capital // Economic Journal. — 1932. — Vol. 42 (1). — P. 42–53.

25. Sraffa P. [1932b]. A Rejoinder // Economic Journal. — 1932. — Vol. 42 (2). — P. 249–251.

26. Vernengo M. Sraffa, Keynes and ‘The Years of High Theory’ // Review of Political Economy. — 2001. — Vol. 13 (3). — P. 343–354.

27. Wicksell K. [1898]. Interest and Prices. — London: Royal Economic Society (Macmillan), 1936.


Review

For citations:


Kavaliou A.V. Natural Interest Rate: Sraff a vs. Hayek Debates. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2019;(3):3-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105201931

Views: 288


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0130-0105 (Print)