Improving the approaches to the assessment of public projects on accessible environment. A case-study
https://doi.org/10.38050/013001052020312
Abstract
This article addresses the development of an integrated approach to assessing the effectiveness of state projects for all types of accessibility (physical, transport, time, information) of environment for the disabled in all directions from the point of view of citizens (rendering state and municipal services and vital activity, categories of disability). The work presents theoretical foundations of the concepts “efficiency of state projects”, “accessible environment”; the analysis of theoretical approaches to the evaluation of state projects’ effectiveness; the practice of implementing state projects on an accessible environment in the Perm region; the efficiency indicators of the realized state projects of an accessible environment for low-mobility groups in the Perm region; problems of assessing the success of state projects; the integrated approach to assessing the effectiveness of state projects; the comparative analysis of the evaluation of state projects implementation by public authorities on the one hand, and organizations of the disabled, on the other. Drawing on the results of the analysis, we may conclude that there are significant differences in evaluating the implementation of state accessibility projects due to functional and organizational reasons. The authors have developed the directions of improving the organization of an accessible environment for low-mobility citizens, such as provision of direct interaction between public organizations of the disabled and public authorities, development of a unified construction concept of accessibility formation, improving the mechanisms for conducting inspections, monitoring and regulatory and legal frameworks in the field of accessibility of the environment.
About the Authors
D. V. Gergert
NRU Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Perm
T. A. Plotinskaya
NRU Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Perm
D. G. Artemyev
NRU Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Perm
References
1. Polozhenie invalidov. Oficial’naja statistika. Naselenie. Federal’naja sluzhba gosudarstvennoj statistiki. URL: http://old.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/population/disabilities/#
2. Postanovlenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 29.03.2019 No 363 «Ob utverzhdenii gosudarstvennoj programmy Rossijskoj Federacii «Dostupnaja sreda» ot 11.04.2019.
3. Postanovlenie Pravitel’stva Permskogo kraja «Ob utverzhdenii gosudarstvennoj programmy «Dostupnaja sreda. Reabilitacija i sozdanie uslovij dlja social’noj integracii invalidov Permskogo kraja» ot 03.10.2013 No 1316-p (red. ot 28.11.2017).
4. Arenkov I.A. Marketingovaja orientacija kompanii na osnove cennostnogo podhoda // Problemy sovremennoj jekonomiki. — 2013. — No 3(47). — C. 266–268.
5. Glazkova V.V. Metodicheskie osnovy ocenki jeffektivnosti social’nyh investicionno-innovacionnyh proektov: dis. na soisk. uchen. step. kand. jekonom. nauk (22.00.04) / Vladimirskij gosudarstvennyj universitet imeni A.G. i N.G. Stole- tovyh. — Jaroslavl’, 2015. — 168 s.
6. Gusarova M. V. Ovchinnikova M. A. Upravlenie po rezul’tatam v sisteme gosudarstvennogo upravlenija v Rossii: podhody i rezul’taty reformirovanija za poslednie 10 let // Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal’nogo upravlenija. — 2014. — No 1. — S. 98–126.
7. Dvinskih D.Ju., Kalgin A. S., Minchenko O. S., Reshetnikova D. S., Sobolev N. A. Administrativnaja reforma i administrativnye cennosti: analiz reform v rusle Novogo gosudarstvennogo upravlenija [Jelektronnyj resurs]: preprint WP8/2014/06 / Nac. issled. un-t «Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki». — M.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki, 2014. — (Serija WP8 «Gosudarstvennoe i municipal’noe upravlenie»).
8. Klimenko A. V. Desjatiletie administrativnoj reformy: rezul’taty i novye vyzovy // Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal’nogo upravlenija. — 2014. — No 1. — S. 8–51.
9. Koljagin S.O. Sovershenstvovanie instrumentarija ocenki jeffektivnosti proektov GChP: dis. na soisk. uchen. step. kand. jekonom. nauk (08.00.05) / Tambovskij gosudarstvennyj universitet imeni G. R. Derzhavina. — Tambov, 2015. — 145 s.
10. Kopel’chuk S. Ju. Problemy finansirovanija gosudarstvennyh proektov // Jekonomika i jekonomicheskie nauki. — 2013. — No 1(14). — C. 1–5.
11. Krasil’nikov D. G., Jakimova M. N. Standart PMBOK i proektnoe upravlenie v OGV Permskogo kraja: priblizhenie k idealu // Gosudarstvennaja politika i politicheskie instituty: istorija i sovremennost’. — 2013. — No 17. — S. 54–64.
12. Kulikov G. G., Navalihina N. D. Metodika monitoringa gosudarstvennogo proekta po kriterijam jeffektivnosti // Programmnye produkty i sistemy. — 2013. — No 4. — C. 82–88.
13. Liga M.B., Pojarkova Z.D., I.A. Shhetkina Ocenka invalidami realizacii gosudarstvennoj programmy «Dostupnaja sreda» // Sociologicheskie issledovanija. — 2016. — No 4. — C. 75–78.
14. Nikonova A.A. Gosudarstvennaja programma «Dostupnaja sreda na 2011-2015 gody» kak faktor likvidacii bar’erov invalidnosti v RF // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2016. — No 1 (33). — S. 76–88.
15. Rukovodstvo k Cvodu znanij po upravleniju proektami (Rukovodstvo PMBOK Shestoe izdanie). — М.: Olimp-Biznes, 2019.
16. Chislennost’ invalidov v Rossijskoj Federacii, federal’nyh okrugah i sub#ektah Rossijskoj Federacii. URL: https://sfri.ru/analitika/chislennost
17. Shevchenko E.A. Upravlenie cepochkoj cennosti firmy instrumental’nogo rynka na osnove potrebitel’skih predpochtenij // Izvestija Dal’nevostochnogo federal’no- go universiteta. Jekonomika i upravlenie. — 2012. — No 2. — C. 106–115.
18. Bakker H., Bosch-Rekveldt M., Coman L., Koops L., Hertog M. Identifying perspectives of public project managers on project success: Comparing viewpoints of managers from five countries in North-West Europe // International journal of project management. — 2016. — No. 5. — P. 874–889.
19. Belassi W. A new framework for determining critical success-failure factors in projects // International journal of project management. — 1996. — No. 3. — P. 141–151.
20. Daniel S., Stewart K. Open source project success: Resource access, flow, and integration // Journal of strategic information systems. — 2016. — No. 3. — P. 159–176.
21. Duncan W.R. Defining and Measuring Project Success // Project Management Partners. — 2005. — No. 4. — P. 957–97.
22. Joslin R., Muller R. The relationship between project governance and project success // International journal of project management. — 2016. — No. 4. — P. 613–626.
23. Kerzner H. Value-driven project management / Harold Kerzner, Frank P. Saladis. The IIL / Wiley series in project management. — International Institute for Learning, Inc., New York. 2009.
24. Lechner T., Mates P., Rieger P. Towards e-Government project assessment: European approach// Communication Technologies. — 2013. — No. 11. — P. 103–125.
25. Riaz A., Noor Azmi Bin M. Exploring the Relationship Between Multi-Dimensional Top Management Support and Project Success: An International Study // International journal of managing projects in business. — 2016. — No. 9. — P. 364–388.
Review
For citations:
Gergert D.V., Plotinskaya T.A., Artemyev D.G. Improving the approaches to the assessment of public projects on accessible environment. A case-study. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2020;(3):237-261. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/013001052020312
Views:
246
Email this article 